Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 5 of 5
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      SK-Canada
      Posts
      111

      Differences between Bilstein and Hotchkis/Bilstein shocks?

      What are the functional differences between Bilstein and Hotchkis/Bilstein shocks that are designed for the same application?

      For example:
      HSS-70010001 $90.95
      http://store.summitracing.com/partde...0&autoview=sku
      &
      BSN-F4B360949HO $61.95
      http://store.summitracing.com/partde...0&autoview=sku

      -Evan
      1980 Chevy Malibu 4dr
      1978 Chevy c10
      2004 Suzuki SV650


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Location
      Hampton Roads, VA
      Posts
      678
      Country Flag: United States
      I believe the Hotchkis Bilsteins are revalved by Hotchkis to be a perfect match for their TVS (Total Vehicle Suspension) system.
      1980 Pontiac Trans Am, Chevy Big Block 468, TKO 600 Trans, Hotchkis TVS, Bilsteins, Eaton/Motive 3:73's, 18" Coddington Junkyard Dogs, Nitto NT555 rubber, Autometers http://www.fquick.com/Bandit
      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2458763

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Southern NJ
      Posts
      542
      Country Flag: United States
      Exactly what Bandit said - a little more aggressive valving by Hotchkis. When they arrive, they are yellow and blue Bilsteins in factory boxes with just a little Hotchkis sticker on them. Marcus and SC&C recommended then over the regular Bilsteins, and I was able to find them for only $2 more per shock at www.performancecenter.com.
      Matt
      1965 Pontiac GTO – Spotts 421 Tripower | TKO600 | 3.90s | Vintage AC | Baers | Hotchkis/SPC/BMR Suspension | Intro Vistas | BFG KDW Redlines | 06 GTO Seats

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      Central CA USA
      Posts
      6,114
      Country Flag: United States
      FYI
      We used them on my wife's 73 Camaro, and they are great on the street. But we found them lacking for autocross, on corner entry the car would "flop" over on the springs, and had excessive roll. Just a little too soft but consider that the car has race rubber and forces are higher than a street car would have. On an open track day the car wasn't as bad, I guess corner entry was not as noticeable as autocrossing.

      I know shocks don't control roll directly, but they change the timing of roll force delivery to the springs and anti-roll bars. The car did roll a lot less after the shock change.
      David
      Last edited by David Pozzi; 04-13-2007 at 07:18 AM.
      67 Camaro RS that will be faster than anything Mary owns.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      SK-Canada
      Posts
      111
      Quote Originally Posted by David Pozzi
      The car did roll a lot less after the shock change.
      David
      Do you mean from stock to these, or from these to your next upgrade?
      -Evan
      1980 Chevy Malibu 4dr
      1978 Chevy c10
      2004 Suzuki SV650




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com