Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      Los Angeles
      Posts
      352

      Struts on '67 Mustang

      Has there been a through thread on putting Fox style struts on early mustang? Seems simple enough but I worry about the angles being all wrong, but then it can't be much worse than stock right?
      -Tas
      -Tas
      '04 Mustang Saleen sc281 speedster
      '67 Mustang notchback: The fabled $500 non running project car: 308, auto, 2 barrel (now 4), AC(now removed), 5 lug, disk front, drum rear, power brakes and steering... that I got started and home for $65 :D

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      Beaufort , NC
      Posts
      1,849
      Country Flag: United States
      There is a company thast makes a kit to do this with a tube K member. But in my .02 its not that great,you will still have shock towers and to me its not that stout looking like the Heidts. www.ajeracing.com
      1968 F100 sb full vic chassis swap
      1965 Mustang coupe 347 5 spd cheap touring SOLD
      2003 Porsche 996 Outlaw LS2 swap SOLD
      1992 Lexus SC400 daily SOLD
      1966 Porsche 912 Outlaw SOLD
      1968 Ford F-100 sb SOLD

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Brampton, Ontario, CANADA !!
      Posts
      347
      Fatman or someone else was doing a kit for putting SN95 struts and spindles on pre-71 Mustangs. Think it was something like $2000.

      The Fox and SN95 geometry is no hell ... not sure if it's much of an upgrade or not.

      cheers
      Ed N.
      Ed Nicholson
      73 VW Super Beetle "Sports Bug"
      95 Taurus SHO 5-speed -- new open-track beater

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      Los Angeles
      Posts
      352
      Quote Originally Posted by fast Ed
      Fatman or someone else was doing a kit for putting SN95 struts and spindles on pre-71 Mustangs. Think it was something like $2000.

      The Fox and SN95 geometry is no hell ... not sure if it's much of an upgrade or not.

      cheers
      Ed N.
      The "engineering" on the fatman stuff leaves me leery from what people have said over the years. In any case I was looking to do anything like that myself. I was just wondering if its worth doing.
      -Tas
      '04 Mustang Saleen sc281 speedster
      '67 Mustang notchback: The fabled $500 non running project car: 308, auto, 2 barrel (now 4), AC(now removed), 5 lug, disk front, drum rear, power brakes and steering... that I got started and home for $65 :D

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Chesapeake, VA
      Posts
      677
      Fatman has a bad name even among a lot of the street rod crowd. If it's considered poorly engineered by people who putt around fairgrounds and put most of their miles on in trailers you might ask yourself if you want to use his stuff to beat it through the twisties.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Brampton, Ontario, CANADA !!
      Posts
      347
      Quote Originally Posted by THX 138
      The "engineering" on the fatman stuff leaves me leery from what people have said over the years. In any case I was looking to do anything like that myself. I was just wondering if its worth doing.
      Well, if you can do it yourself cheap enough, I'd go with SN95 stuff at least, instead of Fox parts. The 96 - up spindles have the best geometry, and with any of the SN95 spindles you have the advantage of numerous options for reasonably priced brake packages.


      cheers
      Ed N.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Boston MA
      Posts
      686
      The original front clip on your mustang will take you way farther than public road will alow. Just look at track times for SVRA group6 mustangs. If you want more ACTUAL performance (not just visual performance or bench performance), spend an evening reading posts at corner-carvers.com.

      1967 #s RS


    8. #8
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Brampton, Ontario, CANADA !!
      Posts
      347
      I agree with that. On my 68 Cougar, with the addition of decent tires, 1" front stab. bar, upper control arm relocation, generic "620" aftermarket front springs, and Koni shocks, the car actually hangs on not bad for an old crapcan, and corners pretty flat. IMO, good tires and Konis make the most difference.


      cheers
      Ed N.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      Los Angeles
      Posts
      352
      I was worried about the stock suspension limiting the front wheel width. I figured a coil over strut would have a lot more room, no?
      -Tas
      '04 Mustang Saleen sc281 speedster
      '67 Mustang notchback: The fabled $500 non running project car: 308, auto, 2 barrel (now 4), AC(now removed), 5 lug, disk front, drum rear, power brakes and steering... that I got started and home for $65 :D

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      McKinney, TX
      Posts
      1,625
      Country Flag: United States
      I asked the same question awhile back...

      http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=628355
      66 Mustang "Project: Ballin on a budget"
      89 Mustang "Box Wine"




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com