Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 3 of 3

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      South Jersey
      Posts
      40

      Early Corvette rear vs. later model

      OK, since you guys got me into this, I need you to help me out on this one. When I started this project, a 68 Firebird Conv. all I wanted was a nice car. Then I started reading all the posts on Pro-Touring and decided that I needed alot more stuff. It started with the big Corvette brakes up front. Then came a mini tub. Then I figured that since I have to cut the frame rails (in questionable condition anyway) I might as well replace them with 2X3 pre-bent rails. Since I'm moving the rails, why not go ahead and put the full Corvette IRS in there. While mentioning to my neighbor that I'll be putting in a Corvette rear he say's that he's got one I can have. Problem is, it's from a '68. So my question is, should I use this rear or sell it and get a later model unit? What are the pro's & con's? I have to add that I'm doing all the work myself and having a blast, but each change in plans ends up costing more and pushing back the completion date.

      J. Clear



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      La La Land, CA
      Posts
      2,241
      Country Flag: United States
      Sell it. Look for the C4 IRS rears for the project. I am doing a 96 Dana 44 in a 67 right now. The Wayne Due weld in IRS kit is a dream. This would not be as straight forward without it.
      Tyler

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      The 63-81 Corvette rearends are not bad pieces, but they do have flaws. There is a major geometry error built into the strut rod placement, it can be corrected for a couple hunderd bucks worth of parts, but its there. The rearends are not the strongest pieces, but if you blueprint the limited slip/ring&pinion they will take a ton of power.
      The halfshafts are a weakpoint, make sure you use u-joints without zerk fittings on them.
      The main bushing on the trailing arm needs to be replaced with a big spherical bearing to really work properly.

      The C4 rearend is a better piece but they have trouble with blowing out hub/bearing assy's. Plan on doing all of the bushings in the trailing arms, a wise man would use spherical bearings there as well.
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett


    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com