Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: PT '78 Malibu
-
11-19-2004 #1
New to Pro-Touring
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 37
PT '78 Malibu
Hello guys,
Here is my Malibu. As you can see it has a glass Montecarlo front end from VFN. A custom steel roll pan out back. Lexan windshield and side windows. Up front chassis mods are a notched front cross-member, Hotchkiss upper control arms that allow me to use 12" Cadillac "A" body spindles, calipers, and rotors. Re-inforced lower control arms. a 1 & 1/8" sway bar. All urethane bushings.
Out back a four link with a wishbone track locator with a 7/8" rod-linked sway bar riding on bronze pillar blocks Koni coilovers. The third member is a Chrysler 8 & 3/4'' with a reinforced housing. 4:88 posi. A 15 gallon foam filled fuel cell with sending unit and a optima battery fed with a 140 amp GM CS alternator from a Cadillac.
The six speed transmission is tied to the rear end with an aluminum drive shaft. Lakewood bell housing with a Mc Cleod hydraulic throwout bearing and flywheel with a Centerforce dual friction disc and pressure plate.
The motor is a a .030 over forged piston 454, a Competion Cams rollercam, crane roller lifters, Crower 3/8" push rods, Crane roller rockers, Isky ultra-rev kit. Lightly massaged GM square port heads, Comp Cams springs and retainers. Gm steel crank, polished rods with ARP bolts. Four bolt GM block with ARP studs. GM windage tray and trapdoor oil pan. Melling HV oil pump with .050 restrictors for the upper galley, which was deburred and polished with screened returns and magnets. Oil feed holes drilled in the front of the lifter galley to lube the B&M gear drive. Fluidamper harmonic balancer. CSI electric water pump. Radiator is a Howe aluminum two flue with Nissan Maxima electric fans. The intake is an open plenum Cutler Enterprises with a Kinsler throttle body. The injectors are Lucas disc-type 43.5 lb. per hr. A Haltech computer controls fuel delivery. An MSD-7-AL with a blaster coil with an on dash advance/retard control. Cyberdyne rich lean gauge with heated O2 sensors in the Super Comp aluma-coated Hooker headers. The engine was blue-printed and balanced.
It has factory A/C and a stereo casette and bucket seats form a Toyota Tercel wagon. A late model Camaro console. Autometer tachometer, water temp. and oil pressure gauges. It has a six point cage from S&W with drop-out side bars.
I proud to say I built everything and did all body and paint work at home except the transmission which was purchased new from Rockland Gear. It's due for a re-paint soon as I'm sick of the graphics and they date the car as to when it was built. I hope you like it.
-
11-19-2004 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 133
looks more like pro street to me.
-
11-20-2004 #3
New to Pro-Touring
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 37
malibu9in,
I appreciate your input even if it wasn't exactly the response I wanted to hear. It's better than no response.looks more like pro street to me.
I could have set up the four link for straight line traction and sacrifice cornering ability; as well as no sway bar up front with 90/10 up-lock shocks and softer taller front springs but I didn't want a Drag only car. It has 4:88 rear gears but the rear tires are 30" tall and with the six speed having two overdrives I didn't have to give up the big end for good acceleration. I haven't made an all out top end run but it was still pulling hard at 130 when I ran out of balls and I was on a public interstate at 3:00 AM. The math says it will top out at 160 if I don't run out of motor or balls.
With the exception of A/C I did everything I could to save sprung weight. No guard rails in the doors. Aluminum tubs and door panels and rear floor boards and bulkhead through to the trunk area. Mar- Guard lexan flush mounted windshield and side curtains (no wiper motor but rain-x works fine for me), shaved door handles and drip-rails and a glass front end. I could have bought a Malibu front end but it wasn't as aerodynamic as the Montecarlo. The Malibu front end would have been a simple bolt on but I chose to change the body lines on the Montecarlo front end to make it fit. You might look at them side by side some day and see how different they really are and if you have ever worked with glass you might appreciate my efforts.
Maybe I'm not understanding what "PT" is.
I am under the impression the spirit of "PT" is to build a car that accelerates well, big top end, handles corners well, and stops well. My car does all four better than most.
Am I wrong; have I missed something?
-
11-20-2004 #4
Hi 69, (name?) well part of the confusion may be from the "look" of your car-it definitely looks more pro-street than pro-touring. The front tires appear to be way skinnier than the rears, the 4" hood, and the graphics(which you already addressed)....well, I try to stay open minded but my first thought was "pro-street". It's a very nice car, and I (and I'm sure most others here) can appreciate the amount of work you have put into it. I especially like that you did all of it yourself! With that said, there may be a disconnect between our definitions of street car vs. race car(with a glass front end, 15 gallon fuel cell, etc, yours is pretty far out there) and p-t vs. straight line performance.
Don't get me wrong, you're definitely welcome here, it just seems a stretch to call your car "pro-touring". It seems much more biased to straight line racing than, say, road course work. I hope you stay and participate, reading the differant opinions of the people here has helped me form up what I want from my car when it is finally off jackstands. Stay and learn (as we all have) and hopefully teach us a thing or two!Brian D
Snotty Bimmer driver.
-
11-20-2004 #5
New to Pro-Touring
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 37
Q ship,
Thanks for the explanation and your input. The name came because I have a 1969 Chevy panel truck. It's bagged and lowered. You guys probably wouldn't like that one either.
As far as the front tires; yes they are skinny. I have some eight inch wide V rated tires mounted on the same style rims. I took the pictures just after returning from Atlanta Dragway, ergo the skinnies up front. I wanted to see what it would turn. I went 12:41 @ 111 and overall mileage to and from the track including three passes was 17.8 mpg.
I suppose I could put 18" wheels or better on it with low profile tires but I have done that on another vehicle and I didn't like the harsh ride. I'm sure that sacrifices some cornering ability due to sidewall flex but I'm getting long in the tooth and prefer the better ride of tall sidewall tires.
Like you mentioned, the graphics have to go but as I stated earlier it was in vogue at the time it was painted last. I felt I would regret them at the time but I let some buddies influence my decission.
I also regret the 15 gallon cell but when I first designed the back half I didn't allow enough room for a larger cell. It's changeable but it will be a relatively huge project as I sunk the cell in a steel pan with small tube frame work because it hangs relatively low and needed protection. The optima battery also sits as low as the fuel cell and is likewise protected.
It's Ok with me if people don't think my car handles well but I know it does. It's Ok that you apparently don't like the paint, I don't either but that is easily changeable for me.
Again thanks for at least making a comment.
-
11-20-2004 #6



Reply With Quote