Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 17 of 17

    Threaded View

    1. #14
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Mountain View, CA
      Posts
      9,583
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2
      hmm.. so instead of peak being 6500 you would like it at 6100? Sure, it's all in how the cam is designed. The cam I am running is by no means on the radical side. The graff shows it made 560hp at 6000 RPM. That's only 13 less hp for a 500rpm drop. Personally I really don't feel the need to have more than 450 rwhp. Much more than that just smokes tires (which is fun too.. lol)
      Exactly. I would prefer to give a little more safety margin to the valve train and bottom end by not spinning the thing quite so high.

      I believe test 2 was just the OE cam, FAST intake, throttle body, AFR heads and headers right?

      Would a little more lift/duration against the OE cam via higher rocker ratio drive the peak up or down?

      True T.

      Whats new with Project 1/2-Trak?


      Follow my wisecracks on Sports, Food, Politics and other BS on Twitter.

      My blog

      When they kick out your front door, How you gonna come?
      With your hands on your head, Or on the trigger of your gun?





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com