Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Southern California / Maryland
      Posts
      489
      Country Flag: United States

      Mopar suspension input needed

      Well... I am looking to make my Charger handle a little better... looking for some input......

      The plan is as follows:
      1.00" torsion bars
      1.25" frant sway bar
      7/8" rear swap bar
      welded subframe connectors
      boxed lower control arms
      tubular upper control arms
      XHD leaf springs
      misc stregnthening of K-frame



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Ridgecrest, CA
      Posts
      232
      All good choices. I have almost the exact same setup, but I went with 1.120" t-bars. You might consider Koni adjustable shocks also.
      1968 Plymouth Road Runner

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Southern California / Maryland
      Posts
      489
      Country Flag: United States
      eh... 1.120" seem to be a little too much for the street arent they ?

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Ridgecrest, CA
      Posts
      232
      Nah. I love the ride. Of course I'm also running a modern cushioned bucket seat in the car from a '99 Chrysler 300M.
      1968 Plymouth Road Runner

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      La Plata, MD
      Posts
      265
      I am running 1.120 t-bars also and actually think they are a little soft. The XHD rear springs are soft also, I am thinking of finding something stiffer in the future. Iron headed 440 in 70 B-body.

      Bruce
      1968 Pontiac Firebird
      LT1/T56
      Bruce

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      Colorado Springs
      Posts
      760
      Mopars tend to be undersprung up front by a substantial amount. If your planning on a 7/8" rear sway bar, you maybe putting more rear roll couple into the car and cause it to push. You could drop the rear to a 3/4" to bring it back inline, or step up the ront torsion bars a step or two to get it more neuteral.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Southern California / Maryland
      Posts
      489
      Country Flag: United States
      hmmmm sounds like a plan.... so bigger T-bars, smaller rear sway bar, XHD leafs and some stregnthening on the K frame ?

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      La Plata, MD
      Posts
      265
      You might want to give these guys a call and talk about rear springs because if you want it to handle the XHD springs are pretty soft.
      http://www.firmfeel.com/b.htm
      1968 Pontiac Firebird
      LT1/T56
      Bruce

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      Colorado Springs
      Posts
      760
      I'll disagree with that to an extent. If you look at the oval track kits mopar developed back in the day, they only used 120# leaf springs. The XHD units are in the neighborhood of 150# with some of the superstock springs going up to around 180#. Certainly not a lot of wheel rate there. If you want to look at a modern comparison, there is a lot of oval track and road race cars out there that are going with softer spring rates and higher sway bar rates so they can still achieve the same roll couple, higher roll resistence, and softer jounce and rebound, which is easier on the tires.

      I still say go big up front and stick with the XHD leafs and use rear sway bar sizes to tune the handling to your liking.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Southern California / Maryland
      Posts
      489
      Country Flag: United States
      got it... somewhere i read an article... 67 Coronet with a 440... .96" torsion bars, tubular upper control arms, frame connectors, poly bushings, XHD leafs, 15" wheels and tires.... pulled a .92g i'll see if i can dig it up...

      The Green brick is also a good example of mopar handeling potential....




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com