Results 21 to 40 of 135
-
08-19-2006 #21
I agree with the E85/propane/whatever engine conversion. I'd like to see that.
Also, about a possible big-brake story.....I for one would like to know the differences between some of the options out there by Baer, Wilwood, Stoptech, stock C5/C6, AP, etc. I mean, what materials or parts make a 13" kit from one different than another.
Actually TESTING them would be awesome, but, I'd settle for spec./material comparison.
-
08-19-2006 #22I'd like to see some hardcore Auto-Xer coverage...
Maybe a story on Mike Maier ( http://www.maierracing.com/ ) or RS Racing's 2nd gen Camaro ( http://www.rsracing.com/ ). A story on the American Autocross series ( http://www.americanauto-x.com/ )
The C-Prepared Auto-X guys are really the ones pioneering the suspension stuff for everyone.1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD
But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...
Just call me Brett
08-19-2006 #23
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 341
I agree with most of the previous post in the thread, especially the E85 ideas. More apples to apples comparisons would be great, for example stopping distance between and Baer track kit, and a C4/C5 kit cobbled together from a scrap yard would be a great start. I understand you have to publish you findings is a somewhat slated way because of the companies that advertise in your magazine. But I believe you could find some way to say the one system is better then the other even if it is less expensive.
I don’t mean to offend people running a MII suspension, but just like *******s everyone has an opinion.
If I see another car featured in a magazine that is supposedly a track monster! That has a MII front sub and a drag racing four link I’m going to puke. Those systems are obviously dated and throwing C5/C6 parts at them will not fix the root problem. Why not feature cars that show real thought and innovation? No I’m not talking about how you can make an 1800 hp twin turbo SBF mustang that’s on 22’s. I’m talking about cars that have thought put into all the sub systems so the whole system works better. For example this car.

There is more info about this car over on CC.com but I think I have seen him post here on PT.com. This car is truly amazing, its street legal, more then track ready and he built it on his driveway. Again in my opinion, this car deserves to be on a cover more then anything Foose built. This car has served as a major motivation to me and I’m sure it would to others, if they only knew about it.
3rd and 4th gen tech would be awesome, as GM High Tech only has limited number of issues per year.
Real world dyno numbers; like with alternators and power steering pumps would be great too. Yes, I love being a fan boy of the LS series engine but really put an LS engine on a chassis dyno and not some slated dyno cell with a 60 degree intake temp.
Alright I’ll get off my pedestal and end my rant, I have had a couple drinks so sorry if my grammar is bad.Stuart Seitz
08-19-2006 #24I mean come-on tell me these guys don't set the pro-touring trends


1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD
But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...
Just call me Brett
08-19-2006 #25Im also on board with the e85 build. I think more of a retro fit article detailing the whole thing with lots of side bars with tech for some one building a e85 specific engine from the ground up.
Id stick with classic cars and not modern EFI cars because the Enviro Nazis have the classics in their sights and If people start running Green fuels it would get them off our backs for a little while. And be a darn good perf fuelNothing says "I built this" better than tool marks and dykem blue..
Follow my 3 link build. https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=61592
08-19-2006 #26



Reply With Quote