Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 14 of 14

    Thread: 5.3?

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      830

      5.3?

      is the 5.3 that comes in the chevy pickups a form of the LSX engines? are the parts interchagable? im thinking about picking up one of these trucks in short bed 2wd form and i think it would make a bitchen performance truck. what kind of power potential does a 5.3 have?



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      mo
      Posts
      1,343
      they are lsx engine.I know a guy that put ls-6 heads and cam on one and it screams.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      42
      one of my coworkers owns a shortbed with possi and 5.3.
      Headers,torque converter, tune runs 13.8 as he claims.
      Nitto tires sticky

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      830
      i know these trucks have potential, i really cant wait to get into one

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States
      www.performancetrucks.net the 5.3 is very overlooked but very capable. It's a modern 327.
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      pittsboro, nc
      Posts
      142
      i recently got an aluminum 5.3 from schram on ebay

      they come stock w/ ~300hp, & can supposedly make 350 w/ headers & retune

      they can be found @ bargin prices compared to the 5.7's

      they have the taller intaker, which is a better torque producer, but isn't a sexy looking as the lower profile version from the sports cars

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      2,314
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by shanekennedy
      i recently got an aluminum 5.3 from schram on ebay
      How was your experience in dealing with Schram? They seem to have some decent deals. I may consider dealing with them in the future if I don't have any luck locally.


      Quote Originally Posted by shanekennedy
      they have the taller intaker, which is a better torque producer, but isn't a sexy looking as the lower profile version from the sports cars
      Aaaahhh yes, Big Ugly. The only intake I've ever seen that actually looks better as you pile more crap on top of it. They would look more intimidating if all of the warts and bumps were smoothed out. If you think this one is ugly, wait until you see the new one on the '08s. It's made in three pieces and then glued together, with just as many or more warts and bumps.
      Ken
      If there is a hard way to do something, I'll find it!
      My other car is a Vega.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      pittsboro, nc
      Posts
      142
      Quote Originally Posted by Kenova
      How was your experience in dealing with Schram? They seem to have some decent deals. I may consider dealing with them in the future if I don't have any luck locally.
      no problems w/ schram, & they have quick shipping. i ran the engine for the first time this weekend. it's still on the pallet. it was quite a jerry-rig setup. there were a few of items missing from engine that i had to track down (maf, tac module & harness, electronic pedal, beauty covers), but i did received everything advertised in the auction.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Springfield, Mo.
      Posts
      443
      Quote Originally Posted by rocketman
      they are lsx engine.I know a guy that put ls-6 heads and cam on one and it screams.
      I am kind of shocked to hear that, I thought that the 5.3 had a smaller chamber in the head and that a LS1/6 head had a larger chamber and would lower the compression ratio even more

      I recently bought a 5.3 because as mentioned above they can be had much cheaper (and i think it is cool to put a modern 327 where a old one used to live)

      I dont know what to expect yet but as long as i can squeeze out 400 rwhp i will be happy
      Wayne
      1967 Camaro - Done!
      1968 Camaro - Underway

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Hamilton, NJ
      Posts
      4,316
      Country Flag: United States
      I have been leaning towards a 5.3/Auto setup for my 67 (it will be a cruiser). I was thinking about the 1500 drive train too. I’m told they will support 300+ HP very easily. But the 5.3 is in the cars now, like the Impala, and I think they are all aluminum. I wonder which setup would be a better candidate for transplant (mount bosses, accessory setups, etc), the car version or the truck version. I want AC in the 67, and I understand that can be an issue in retrofits due to the AC mounting location. But I’m just starting my reading on this.

      Edit: I noticed that big intake the other night on a truck. Can LS1 intakes fit the 5.3 motors? Again, maybe the car versions have a good solution.
      Scott from NJ.

      Vent Windows Forever! ...

      Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold
      I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
      Posts
      1,364
      Country Flag: Canada
      Even just a cam and LT's on the 5.3's make the thing a screamer for cheap.

      -Matt
      Matt
      72 Chevelle 370ci, 76mm single turbo, TKX, Speedtech Track Time, Millerbuilt Strange full floater 9", Brembo brakes, BC Forged 18x11s with 315s square
      Instagram: Cst_koon

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      2,314
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
      I have been leaning towards a 5.3/Auto setup for my 67 (it will be a cruiser). I was thinking about the 1500 drive train too. I’m told they will support 300+ HP very easily. But the 5.3 is in the cars now, like the Impala, and I think they are all aluminum. I wonder which setup would be a better candidate for transplant (mount bosses, accessory setups, etc), the car version or the truck version. I want AC in the 67, and I understand that can be an issue in retrofits due to the AC mounting location. But I’m just starting my reading on this.

      Edit: I noticed that big intake the other night on a truck. Can LS1 intakes fit the 5.3 motors? Again, maybe the car versions have a good solution.
      The 5.3 used in the front wheel drive cars has a real funky looking water pump and accessory drive. You would probably have major clearance issues. There are some all aluminum 5.3s being used in Trailblazers, Envoys and full size trucks.
      The LS1 and LS6 intake manifolds will bolt up to the truck heads but usually create interferance problems between the throttle body and water pump outlet. This can be solved by changing the crank pulley/harmonic damper, water pump and accessory drive over to F-body, Corvette or Caddy CTS-V.
      You are right about the AC pumps mouting location causing interference. Most people wind up using a custom AC bracket.
      Ken
      If there is a hard way to do something, I'll find it!
      My other car is a Vega.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Mountain View, CA
      Posts
      9,583
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Kenova
      The 5.3 used in the front wheel drive cars has a real funky looking water pump and accessory drive. You would probably have major clearance issues. There are some all aluminum 5.3s being used in Trailblazers, Envoys and full size trucks.
      The LS1 and LS6 intake manifolds will bolt up to the truck heads but usually create interferance problems between the throttle body and water pump outlet. This can be solved by changing the crank pulley/harmonic damper, water pump and accessory drive over to F-body, Corvette or Caddy CTS-V.
      You are right about the AC pumps mouting location causing interference. Most people wind up using a custom AC bracket.
      Ken
      Have there been aluminum 5.7's or 6.0's in any of the trucks?

      Just wondering if I can widen my search parameters for "parting out" ads.
      True T.

      Whats new with Project 1/2-Trak?


      Follow my wisecracks on Sports, Food, Politics and other BS on Twitter.

      My blog

      When they kick out your front door, How you gonna come?
      With your hands on your head, Or on the trigger of your gun?

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      2,314
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by Damn True
      Have there been aluminum 5.7's or 6.0's in any of the trucks?

      Just wondering if I can widen my search parameters for "parting out" ads.
      No 5.7s for the trucks, and all 6.0s have been iron .... so far. There are a slew of 5.3s for '08 and they are all aluminum but can't say for sure if the 4.8s are. The 6.0 also gets an aluminum block for '08. There is a 6.2 that will be used in some of the full sized SUVs and probably the GMC Denali. I'm also not sure if it is iron or aluminum. Most (maybe all) get DOD.
      Ken
      If there is a hard way to do something, I'll find it!
      My other car is a Vega.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com