Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
    Results 21 to 40 of 49

    Thread: Viper on Air!!

    1. #21
      Join Date
      Nov 2001
      Location
      Sacramento Ca
      Posts
      6,827
      Country Flag: United States
      Since Tony didn't say, It's possible the car handles just as well as stock at ride height. Some of the air ride cars handle better than coilover setups.

      Tony Langlois
      1966 Corvair Monza


    2. #22
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      341
      Quote Originally Posted by TonyL
      Since Tony didn't say, It's possible the car handles just as well as stock at ride height.
      Just so we are clear when I said Tony, I ment Tony@AirRide. Yes it is possible but I was going on what he did say

      Quote Originally Posted by Tony@AirRideTech
      Besides... when you start looking at serious cars... From prostock, the saltflats to Road coarse cars... they are damn near sitting on the deck. Even look at a lot of the Vintage Trans-am cars they are racing again and those cars are low
      Now mabye I'm being an ass for assuming but to me that sounds like he was making a direct comparison.

      Quote Originally Posted by TonyL
      Some of the air ride cars handle better than coilover setups.
      I'm going to use PHR G/28 as an example, as it is an apples to apples (kind of) comparison of a coilspring/shock and an air ride suspension.

      Tech: http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...wheel_upgrade/

      Now after reading this artical there was a couple things that rubed me the wrong way. Now I'll step out on a limb and assume that Air Ride Suspensions is arguably one of the most advanced air based suspensions the after market has to offer. As I was truly impressed with the adjustablity in the system as a whole. Which brings me to my next point, where was the adjustment in the coil spring/shock set up? Ohh yeah there was none. Granted I understand that G/28 is ment to be a budget project, as it some what limits shock selection, but a lot of people see it as an apples to apples comparison as to which suspension is better (yes I know there is no "best" suspension). Why didn't PHR spend a little more money on an in integral part of the suspension mabye an adjustable Penske or Bilstein rather then a POS KYB? Or mabye not just sticking with one spring rate, and heaven forbid tuning the car, rather then just throwing parts at it.

      As for a coilover set up, do you really want to compare a SRT10 with Moton or Penske's to a Air Ride equipped SRT10. Now I understand that this comparison may be on one end of the spectrum, but agian I'm comparing top of the line, to top of the line. Replaceing Q1A's with Air Ride and seeing a noticable improvment isn't saying much.
      Stuart Seitz

    3. #23
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      Quote Originally Posted by Stu Seitz
      Just so we are clear when I said Tony, I ment Tony@AirRide. Yes it is possible but I was going on what he did say



      Now mabye I'm being an ass for assuming but to me that sounds like he was making a direct comparison.



      I'm going to use PHR G/28 as an example, as it is an apples to apples (kind of) comparison of a coilspring/shock and an air ride suspension.

      Tech: http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...wheel_upgrade/

      Now after reading this artical there was a couple things that rubed me the wrong way. Now I'll step out on a limb and assume that air ride Suspensions is arguably one of the most advanced air based suspensions the after market has to offer. As I was truly impressed with the adjustablity in the system as a whole. Which brings me to my next point, where was the adjustment in the coil spring/shock set up? Ohh yeah there was none. Granted I understand that G/28 is ment to be a budget project, as it some what limits shock selection, but a lot of people see it as an apples to apples comparison as to which suspension is better (yes I know there is no "best" suspension). Why didn't PHR spend a little more money on an in integral part of the suspension mabye an adjustable Penske or Bilstein rather then a POS KYB? Or mabye not just sticking with one spring rate, and heaven forbid tuning the car, rather then just throwing parts at it.

      As for a coilover set up, do you really want to compare a SRT10 with Moton or Penske's to a Air Ride equipped SRT10. Now I understand that this comparison may be on one end of the spectrum, but agian I'm comparing top of the line, to top of the line. Replaceing Q1A's with Air Ride and seeing a noticable improvment isn't saying much.
      While i agree with most of what you're saying, one thing i'd like to point out that air shocks, at least in performance applications, are still pretty much in their infancy. Thus, the "line" that air ride shockwaves are at the top of is still much shorter. So, effectively, there is not yet any air spring suspension that is "as far up the line", so to speak, as motion or penske coilovers. There's noone out there (yet?) running these things on a full-out, hardcore race application, nor is the technology there for such a car to exist yet, but when it does, I expect to see leaps and bounds forward in the performance levels from air springs.

      Considering where air springs were a decade ago and the reputation they still carry today, i think that replacing even a good traditional-style performance suspension (i.e. coils and leaves) with air ride and seeing a performance improvement at all is saying a lot about how far the technology has advanced. The idea that air ride could be better than a mid-level performance suspension (i.e. qa1 based) was ludicrous even a few years ago.

      You're right, though. For a full-out, hardcore track car, air ride is stupid. You're sacrificing the ability to tune spring rate and ride height independently. However, on a street-strip car, it blends on-the-fly spring rate tunability with excellent ride quality and mid-front-pack track performance. That, to me, is a tough combo to beat.

    4. #24
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Posts
      94
      Quote Originally Posted by ProStreet R/T
      Ymm yeah, last I checked they didn't have speed bumps and steep driveways in the middle of race tracks.
      Hey there's an idea.Let's make racing more interesting.And throw some of those cardboard cut-outs of pedestrians popping up from the ground like in the movies.
      "There is no such thing as 'cheating'...it's called 'innovation'"
      ~Smokey Yunick

    5. #25
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Jasper,IN
      Posts
      540
      Quote Originally Posted by F70t/a
      The viper looks bitchin!!! any info on the complete setup and what controls it's using? Pics of it at ride height would be cool too
      We used the ARC4000L LevelPro compressor kit. That's the one with the new leveling system. Here is a pic of ride height and 4wd mode.
      Attached Images Attached Images    

    6. #26
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Jasper,IN
      Posts
      540
      Quote Originally Posted by Stu Seitz
      As for a coilover set up, do you really want to compare a SRT10 with Moton or Penske's to a air ride equipped SRT10. Now I understand that this comparison may be on one end of the spectrum, but agian I'm comparing top of the line, to top of the line. Replaceing Q1A's with air ride and seeing a noticable improvment isn't saying much.
      Hey, there not much stopping us from sliding an air spring over a set of Penske's, except for money.....

      I figured there would be some mixed opinions about this car. But personally, I like it!

    7. #27
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Long Island, NY
      Posts
      11,320
      Country Flag: United States
      Just a side note here: the arguement against an air ride car being too low (speed bumps, steep driveways, etc) is an incredibly specious arguement, which is actually quite contrary. The car is so low, how could it ever get by in normal day to day driving? Oh, that's right -- it's bagged, and thus the owner can raise or lower the car to his hearts contentment. At a show -- drop it. Steep driveway or speed bump? --4x4 mode as outlined above. When a slammed car with coil overs comes to a speed bump where it does not have sufficicent clearance -- What does it do? Break out the wrenches and start raising the car in the parking lot, or reverse and head home? The air ride guy next to you has to hit one switch.

      As for the performance of the systems, I think they've proven themselves to be well handling systems (as good as traditional c/o's on a tuned suspension -- probably not, but I'll let you guys argue that amongst yourselves).

    8. #28
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      Quote Originally Posted by darren@ridetech
      We used the ARC4000L LevelPro compressor kit. That's the one with the new leveling system. Here is a pic of ride height and 4wd mode.
      hah, you know what that 4wd shot reminds me of? anybody remember the early-90's tv show "viper", with the super-cool transforming cop viper?

      can't find any shots of it, but one of their stunt vehicles used modified dakota running gear for off-road shots. It sat just like that car lol.


    9. #29
      Join Date
      Dec 2002
      Location
      Lost Wages, Nevada
      Posts
      2,683
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Tony@AirRideTech
      Besides... when you start looking at serious cars... From prostock, the saltflats to Road coarse cars... they are damn near sitting on the deck. Even look at a lot of the Vintage Trans-am cars they are racing again and those cars are low.
      Yup. You are correct...... but then again, they are not on bags, nor will they ever be. They are set up with performance suspensions, not some "bling-able" idea to drop it in the weeds to mearly look cool in a parking-lot. Real performance and bags are to very different things.

      Or....

      If you still wear your baseball cap sidewayz with your boxer shorts hangin out..... "It looks wicked laced out, yo." And maybe if you find yourself still using the phrases of 'fo shizzle my nizzle' , walk with a limp and actually think an H2 is really a 'Hummer'.... "Its mad fly pimpin. G".

      Yeah... yeah, I know. Bags have come a long way in the past 5 years or so..... I was baggin sleds 15 years ago, but it was as novel then as it is now. Infancy !?!! How about, they are still a little pre-mature ?? Give them another 5 years and lets see what happends. the control units and smart technology will do them some good. Would be pretty cool to integrate and active ride height control that worked off of vehicle speed tho......

      In consideration to true performance, please dont waste a set of Penskes. Its probably a good idea that you guys, basically dont want to afford them..... leave them to people who dont care about blingy parking lot showcars and can actually use them.

      The snake..... does look pretty cool in the weeds though.

    10. #30
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      foamy (which by the way is the best avatar ever), out of curiosity....on the same shock, what would the performance difference between an airspring and a coil-over spring with the same spring rate and ride height?

      And you say you were baggin sleds 15 years ago...how long ago were you baggin sleds and then racing them? How long ago was anyone even considering trying to mix air springs and race tracks? That's why I said it's still in its infancy in performance applications.

    11. #31
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      221
      here is a little salt in the wounds for some of you guys.......
      Attached Images Attached Images        

    12. #32
      Join Date
      Mar 2003
      Location
      Make it big
      Posts
      1,240
      Quote Originally Posted by darren@ridetech
      We used the ARC4000L LevelPro compressor kit. That's the one with the new leveling system. Here is a pic of ride height and 4wd mode.

      Thanks for the pics Keep up the good work
      -David

    13. #33
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      221
      here is a few more different images that I have come across.....

      Darren..... did we ever get images of the Crafstman truck that we fitted that "they" were going to do some testing with? If you have some and post em, make sure you dont post any of the exterior skin. "they" would be a little upset....
      Attached Images Attached Images      

    14. #34
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      489
      Ok out of cuirosity. With the viper at normal ride height, what is the spring rate of the airbags?

      Is there a variable accumulator in the system to control how progressive the system is, and to alter the specific spring rate?

    15. #35
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      221
      On that particular application I could not give you the specs because I was not that close to the project. The tapered sleeve and rolling lobe airspring we used on there are not nearly as progressive though as the common double convoluted springs.

    16. #36
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      nw arkansas
      Posts
      331
      tony , what is the engine and cradle going in ?

    17. #37
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      jasper IN
      Posts
      344
      Country Flag: United States
      wow, i see you guys like the viper, now we need to talk him into coming to the street challenge so we can put this subject to rest....

    18. #38
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      221
      That thing is wicked isnt it........ that is actually going in a kit car that is built by Shelby Super Cars up in Oregon. They are not your run of the mill kit cars... they take these things pretty seriously Serious and pricey enough that I dont even have the heart to call them a kit car.
      Attached Images Attached Images  

    19. #39
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      489
      Quote Originally Posted by jb@ridetech
      wow, i see you guys like the viper, now we need to talk him into coming to the street challenge so we can put this subject to rest....
      Actually if you want to put it to rest lets run it against a viper with a nice coilover setup.

      Viper Nationals in Columbus is the weekend after next if you're in the area. If not maybe something else can be arranged.

    20. #40
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      221
      I would not have any fears or problem in doing that.... unfortunately, its not our car. This was a paying customer and it is his car to do with what he wants.

    Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com