Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Huntington Beach, CA
      Posts
      2,420
      Country Flag: United States

      Hotchkis subframe connects that require no pan cutting?

      Hey all,

      What do you guys think of these subframe connectors that don't require cutting the floor pan? I've got a 68 Camaro that I took over the restoration on. The car is far enough in the assembly process that I don't want to cut the floor pan. I believe it was hotchkis that I read about who makes a set of sub frame connects that doesn't reqire cutting and wanted to get some feedback.

      Thanks!

      Please Subscribe to the AutoXandTrack YouTube Channel

      Autocross and track blog about running autocross and track events with pro touring cars


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm sure others will have other opinions, but my thoughts...

      Pros:
      • Little fabrication skills necessary.
      • Easily return the car to stock if desired.
      • Subframe can easily be seperated for maintenance.


      Cons:
      • Not as supportive
      • Will hang lower (aesthetics and possibly ground clearance issues)

    3. #3
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Location
      Rhode Island
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      I don't have any feedback on the hotchkis ones, but global west also makes some that weld into the rear subframe and bolt up in the front, and you don't have to cut your floor pans. I ordered a set last week along with the solid body mounts for my 68 firebird.
      Rene P.

      My 1968 firebird build thread--->https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...rd-on-a-budget

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Huntington Beach, CA
      Posts
      2,420
      Country Flag: United States
      Hrm, hadn't thought of ground clearence issues.

      Let us know how you like the global west ones.
      Please Subscribe to the AutoXandTrack YouTube Channel

      Autocross and track blog about running autocross and track events with pro touring cars

    5. #5
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Location
      Rhode Island
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      Here's a link to an article in chevy high performance on the installation of the global west connectors. there's a picture of it when its complete, not the best picture, but they don't look like they hang down too far, at least not enough to cause major clearance problems.

      http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/howto/68238/
      Rene P.

      My 1968 firebird build thread--->https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...rd-on-a-budget

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Elk Ridge, Utah
      Posts
      602
      Country Flag: United States

      I have used Global west

      I put a set of Globalwest sub conectors on a 66 mustang fastback
      at the customers request and supplyd parts

      My opinnion is they are Sh@# they hang low and have a bend in them to come back up to the rear spring mounts. A straight tube has some strength but a Bent one?

      Go with the DSE conectors they are WAY better and actually do somthing to strengthen the car. And they dont hang low

      IMO global west needs a new engeneer. their front susp setup for that same mustang was a Joke tjhe car has horrible bumpsteer ( I mean like over 1 inch ) the car feels horribly squirrly on the fwy over bumps

      GL Ken F
      69 Camaro
      W/D sub, Wilwood 13" brakes Bozeforged wheels 18X10 & 18X12,
      Lateral dynamics 3 link ( custom setup ) Dana 60
      lsX Twin Turbo, soon to come
      Viper T56 in place (Yay)
      Bought a running driving car so I can enjoy it before Im dead
      LD 3 Link Installed into ^^^^^ (Yay)

    8. #8
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      THE GW Subframe connectors work very well.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 6'9"Witha69
      THE GW Subframe connectors work very well.
      Yep, the GW units require no cutting of the floors either and work very well. Also, they hug the floor and really don't hurt clearance. I would think the Hotchkis units work about the same.

      The weld in and cut the foor types are most likely stiffer BUT you are 1. cutting your car and 2. if you have pull your front subframe its a PITA.

      Both systems have their pros and thier cons...
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Posts
      37
      I think the connectors from 21st century are much better.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com