Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
10-07-2004 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 12
Calling all Camaros w/ MANUAL steering!
I was wondering how it was driving around with 17" or 18" wheels with manual steering. How is the steering response? decent or real slow?
What about in a parking lot, is it hard to manuver? I am contemplating swapping to manual because it is a much cleaner install, not as many accessories to drive,no hoses an pump to leak. But most of the steering boxes I've seen have been 6 turns lock to lock? If you got manual steering and you like it, let me know what kind of steering box it is or where I can find one, Convince me to go with manual steering!
By the way, I am running a 74 camaro, Any help or suggestions are welcome. THANKS!!!!!!!!!!
-
10-08-2004 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- Muskegon, MI
- Posts
- 4,494
My car just plain sucks with the original manual steering. It always sucked and still does.
15" or 18" didnt matter. Still sucks.
:edit A brand new manual steering box will do a lot better especially one with a quicker gear ratio.Adam_______Offical Car Name "ILLUSION"
383 Stroker, Stock cast heads, T-56 tranny, 4.11 gears, 2002 T/A dash, 4th gen interior including seatbelts, power lumbar seats, 18" Budnik Wheels, Hydraboost, QA1 shocks, DC Controller, Power steering conversion, fuel cell, unique exhaust set up........
ILLUSION Website-----------Old Website--------------My Car on Lateral-g.net----------- Need something designed?-AdFabDesign
10-08-2004 #3
-ɹoʇɐɹǝpoW-
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- Mesquite, TX
- Posts
- 4,941
Hi Super (what's your name?), welcome to the site.
Wheel diameter is not such a big deal - the tire diameter would remain close to the same anyway.
Wheel width is a bigger influence - the wider the tires, the harder the car is to steer at a dead stop.
When you're moving it's not too bad regardless of width; I'm sure you've driven a power steering car with failed power assist.
I imagine that if you couldn't find a manual box with a good lock-to-lock number, you could fill a good power box with fluid and cap it off so it didn't leak out (others may be able to chime in on this to tell you that's a good/bad idea).
10-08-2004 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- El Dorado Hills, CA
- Posts
- 789
I don't really have a problem with my manual steering on my Camaro. It has had manual since I bought it. Never changed to power. I agree with Derek though, tougher to turn wheel when stopped, but not that much tougher...
Brad
68 Camaro - Procharged LQ4 coming - Currie 9" narrowed, bagged, lays frame, BMW projector HID's LED tails, 18"s, lexus center console, seat warmers, A/C... Mini-tubbing in progress!!
07 BMW 750li -loaded
10-08-2004 #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 12
Manual Steering
What would be a good replacement, or donor car to get a quicker ratio box from. Is a manual box from an 80's S-10 or a 70 Camaro a good choice? I have driven my Camaro with the belt off the pump with my power steering box, And I had a 1969 3/4 ton gmc long bed that 47 turns lock to lock!!!!!!!, not really but I think you know what I mean. Niether one was any good. If you have swapped to manual steering,please chime in. THANKS.
10-09-2004 #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Santa Barbara, Ca
- Posts
- 1,174
What's up guys. I used to have a stock manual box in my 68. I have to say that it was not a fun experience. When I assembled my car after it was purchased, I used the stock power steering setup that came with it. Every part leaked, so I switched to a manual box off a 68 that my friend had crashed. Even with skinny drag tires in front (at the time), parking was still a pain. When I converted my car to handle, I still had the manual box, and it was much worse. The ratio was slow, and with wide tires it was hard to steer, even at speed. I switched to a fast ratio power setup with all new parts, and I couldn't be happier.
-Andy
Reply With Quote
