Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: LS1/A4 swap.
-
02-09-2006 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Bay Area CA
- Posts
- 140
LS1/A4 swap.
I have a complete A4 2001 Trans Am I just picked up. I'm thinking of the beauties of the LSX design now and all the advantages. Retrofit costs is high though.
Anyway, being I have the entire car, what would I need to save/reuse to get this thing installed and running in my '73 as cheaply as possible? I figure the entire car is in my garage runnign right now, everything I really need is there besides things needed to make the darn thing fit. Looking for functional right now, not pretty.
-Ian
1973 Formula 400
LS1/T56/3.73's
Daily Driven.
-
02-10-2006 #2Besides the engine & tranny. If your not looking for show.
I'd use & keep:
stock manifolds
the engine harness & PCM (which will need to be modified)
all engine accesories
driveshaft (resized)
rack & pinion setup (if you want to convert it)
radiator & hoses
all you would need to buy would be engine mount plates, a tranny cross member, modify the oil pan or buy the ATS pan, and have your engine harness & PCM reworked and tuned.
You could even use the 4th gen seats, dash & console. And I think you can even use the disc brakes with some sort of adapter plates.1969 CAMARO RS
2002 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 452 rwhp, 425 rwtq
Project pics of my '69
Lateral-G Feature Page
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
02-10-2006 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Bay Area CA
- Posts
- 140
I'm also thinking about keeping my BTO 2004R instead of the 4L60, just because its already built to Stage 3 specs. Assuming I do keep the 4L60E, Besides VATS(they have that VATS thing on ebay), and the rear 02's(sim's?) what specifically will need to be changed regarding the harness and the PCM? What might it be looking for that I could swap over?
I'm also kind of tossing around the idea of using the 01's gauge cluster, being it will receive the correct signals as is, and it looks kind of cool.
-Ian
1973 Formula 400
LS1/T56/3.73's
Daily Driven.
02-10-2006 #4



Reply With Quote