Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 11 of 11
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Mar 2014
      Location
      Temecula, CA
      Posts
      76

      Transmission and rear end gear ratios

      Hey guys, I’ve fallen into the trap of doing research on the internet. Im building (hear me out) an E36. I’ve got a mildly cammed 5.3 built for it and I’m probably going to end up going t10 since I have one readily available. And no I can’t afford a tkx or t56 so the t10 I have is a 2.64 first gear and the rear end in the car is a 3.91. I’m not worried about highway mpg because it’s pure track/fun car. I’ve read a lot of contradicting info that I can’t wrap my head around. I’m afraid it’s not going to launch hard and that’s really what I want first and foremost. Somebody help explain!! Name:  IMG_7661.jpg
Views: 1187
Size:  391.0 KB
      Little PFA ;)

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      Posts
      508
      Country Flag: United States
      You can use this calculator to figure out your rpms and shift points.

      https://www.blocklayer.com/rpm-gear

      5.3s aren't know for a lot of torque so you'll have to put a little rpm to your launch but you should have plenty fun with it.
      *Jeff*
      Project Salty - 1964 4 door Malibu, beaten, neglected, red headed foster child
      Cammed LQ4 / T56 Swap Project Thread <-click to read! 😁

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Mar 2014
      Location
      Temecula, CA
      Posts
      76
      Thank you for this. The cam I have is advertised to make 400+ in a 5.3 but the car will probably weigh 2500 pounds ish with me in it. I’m just more worried about is being a pig because of the ratios. I’ll be honest, the combination of rear end ratio and trans ratios are way over my head lol



    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Walla Walla, WA
      Posts
      1,512
      Country Flag: United States
      Rear tire size?
      Mike Kelcy - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Mar 2014
      Location
      Temecula, CA
      Posts
      76
      Quote Originally Posted by Mkelcy View Post
      Rear tire size?
      285/35/18

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Walla Walla, WA
      Posts
      1,512
      Country Flag: United States
      I've got an LS376/480, a 2.66 first gear T56 in front of a 3.70 rear end. My overall first gear ratio is 9.84, and I can light up my 295-35-18's all the way through first and second gears in a '68 Camaro. You'll be at about 10.24 overall first gear ratio in a much lighter car. I think you'll be fine.
      Mike Kelcy - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Mar 2014
      Location
      Temecula, CA
      Posts
      76
      Quote Originally Posted by Mkelcy View Post
      I've got an LS376/480, a 2.66 first gear T56 in front of a 3.70 rear end. My overall first gear ratio is 9.84, and I can light up my 295-35-18's all the way through first and second gears in a '68 Camaro. You'll be at about 10.24 overall first gear ratio in a much lighter car. I think you'll be fine.
      If you don’t mind, can you explain the math behind that?

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Walla Walla, WA
      Posts
      1,512
      Country Flag: United States
      My combo - 2.66 x 3.70 = 9.842; your combo - 2.64 x 3.91 = 10.322. Our rear tire heights are about the same. I have more torque and weight, you're lighter with less torque. I think you'll be okay.
      Mike Kelcy - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Mar 2014
      Location
      Temecula, CA
      Posts
      76
      Ahhh understood, thank you

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jul 2011
      Location
      Plano, Texas
      Posts
      355
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Mkelcy View Post
      My combo - 2.66 x 3.70 = 9.842; your combo - 2.64 x 3.91 = 10.322. Our rear tire heights are about the same. I have more torque and weight, you're lighter with less torque. I think you'll be okay.
      agree - you have a light car, the 2.64 will be just fine, it will also make for more time in first gear which is good for a track car. you also wont get as much rpm drop shifting to 2nd. This combo will be just fine.
      Michael Mosley
      1968 Barracuda
      Plano, TX

      https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...in-Plano-Texas

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Mar 2014
      Location
      Temecula, CA
      Posts
      76
      Quote Originally Posted by mmosley View Post
      agree - you have a light car, the 2.64 will be just fine, it will also make for more time in first gear which is good for a track car. you also wont get as much rpm drop shifting to 2nd. This combo will be just fine.
      Thanks for the input!! That also makes me feel better




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com