Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 7 of 7

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jul 2023
      Location
      St Augustine Florida USA
      Posts
      2
      Country Flag: United States

      66 Skylark convertible suspension upgrade help needed

      I have a 66 Skylark with original but updated suspension (bushings, mostly). Although the ride is not bad, I'd like to upgrade the suspension to give the car a firmer, more modern feel and improved handling. I won't be racing or canyon-carving; just a little spirited cruising every now and then. Are there any benefits, for my purposes, in installing tubular control arms and drop spindles, in addition to sway bars and coil-overs? Thanks
      Ps, the front rides pretty high so I want to lower it.
      Name:  IMG_2893.jpeg
Views: 378
Size:  173.4 KB



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Milwaukee, WI USA
      Posts
      440
      Country Flag: United States
      Forget the tubular a-arms, drop spindles, and coil-overs... for your application they would be a waste of cash, IMO.
      I'd go with new drop coil springs and new shocks (I like the Bilstein's).
      1969 Camaro SS, 350(NOM), M21, 12 Bolt Posi, 01B (Jan 69) LOS Build

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2022
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      66
      I disagree with just new coil springs and shocks. Been there, done that - it in no way felt like a modern car.

      Tubular arms will allow you to run far more positive caster, which will make your steering feel more modern. If you're on a budget, you can just run uppers (assuming your stock lowers are in good condition).

      Coilovers are likely not necessary for performance, but will make getting the ride height correct far easier. I'd personally be careful with drop spindles. My car (68 Olds) has 1" drop springs and sits way too low. Front crossmember is 4" off the ground, headers have less than 3" of clearance. I scrape - a lot. I can't imagine putting another inch of drop on the car. Coilovers will give you a bit of adjustment, but they can't correct a huge change.

      A tall upper balljoint will help correct the horrible camber curve without a ton of cost. A rear sway bar will help keep it from understeering so badly. Likely just need a control-arm mounted bar. If you're running factory lower arms, make sure they're boxed.

      You really don't need a ton for your use case. Just a few key pieces will help considerably.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Hamilton, NJ
      Posts
      4,314
      Country Flag: United States
      ^^^ what he said.

      Give UMI a call
      Scott from NJ.

      Vent Windows Forever! ...

      Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold
      I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Sep 2022
      Posts
      4
      Improved front end geometry and a quicker ratio steering box with a larger torsion bar will improve road manors and feel, at least that’s my experience

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,821
      Country Flag: United States
      ridetech street grip is a lot of bang for the buck along with a quick ratio steering box. The best riding A body I built had SPC arms, AFX spindles, SPC springs, Bilstein shocks. Hellwig sway bars, C6 Z51 brakes, and a Turn One steering box. Awesome cruiser.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jul 2023
      Location
      St Augustine Florida USA
      Posts
      2
      Country Flag: United States
      Don, et al, thanks for your responses. The ridetech offerings look good.
      Olds. PhD, your suggestions sound very reasonable. Thanks!




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com