Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2019
      Posts
      3

      Insted of buying tubular A arms for an f-body

      As I understand it, tubular a arms main advantage it to gain some caster. I was thinking of machining the stock shaft back 3/8 to 1/2 (from blue line to red line in photo)and adding a spacer to the other end. Why will this not work?



      Name:  20200418_145003.jpg
Views: 1842
Size:  99.3 KB


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,827
      Country Flag: United States
      Depending on the car you might move the wheel back too far and cause rubbing.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Fredericksburg, VA.
      Posts
      3,164
      Country Flag: United States
      I think there is a lot more to it than that. A proper set of UCA/LCAs will correct all of the deficiencies of the stock F-body suspension. I don't see how taking some material off the cross bar will help anything much.
      Steve Hayes
      "Dust Off"
      68 Camaro

      Support the RPM Act
      https://www.sema.org/rpm-faq.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      May 2015
      Location
      Island Lake, IL
      Posts
      816
      Country Flag: United States
      Moog sells an offset version.
      https://www.summitracing.com/parts/m...waAsM7EALw_wcB

      Also, Global West has their own version for an offset crosshaft.

      It’s probably just better to buy an offset shaft if that’s what you want.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      IL/TN
      Posts
      908
      Country Flag: United States
      offset shafts don't affect caster.
      https://www.protouringf-body.com "doing what they say can't be done"

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      corona,ca.
      Posts
      1,115
      Country Flag: United States
      I think what your effectively trying to do is move the upper ball joint back,to increase caster,will it work? I dunno.
      If you do try it I would do it in small increments and see if it changes anything,but in the end if your not doing the alignment yourself at home,the cost of the experiment might cost as much as buying tubulars that have the geometry revised.give it a shot and report back.
      Good luck.
      72 chevelle.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2019
      Posts
      3
      I just made some calculations and 3/8" would only add 1.9° and 1/2" would be 2.6°. Therefore 5° would have the joint back almost an inch.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      corona,ca.
      Posts
      1,115
      Country Flag: United States
      Moving the lower bj foward is what also equates to the increase of positive caster,just a thought for you.

      - - - Updated - - -

      What vehicle is this for?
      72 chevelle.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2019
      Posts
      3
      Quote Originally Posted by chevelletiger View Post

      What vehicle is this for?
      2nd gen Camaro.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      IL/TN
      Posts
      908
      Country Flag: United States
      waist of time honestly, cut the mount off and re-weld it rearward.
      https://www.protouringf-body.com "doing what they say can't be done"




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com