Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 4 of 4
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2013
      Location
      West Blocton, Al
      Posts
      151
      Country Flag: United States

      Second gen camaro front suspension set up

      I have a 73 Camaro and I have recently stepped up from stock control arms to the UMI adjustable with tall ball joints (part number 265256-1 http://umiperformance.com/catalog/in...th=340_445_446) What would be the a good set up for road course and street. I am leaning towards the theory of the same amount of caster as KPI (not sure what a second gen is stock) and plan to go 1 degree camber for street and be able to add normal alignment shims to the upper mounts to pull in more camber for road coarse without changing caster. does that sound about right? or an I missing something?



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      Central CA USA
      Posts
      6,114
      Country Flag: United States
      I'd run 7 deg positive caster, camber at 2 to 2.5 I've done 1.5 neg camber a lot on the street, I'd try 1 to 1.5 for your street setup. In theory more caster should allow you to set less neg camber and still have the tire flat around corners as the steering wheel is turned and the car dives and gains positive caster and more neg camber.
      Second gen's toe in under bump, so you don't need much if any toe-in. I'd set 1/8" toe out total and see how that works on the street. For tight autox you can set 3/16" to 1/4" toe out, but that might be a bit much for street driving.
      67 Camaro RS that will be faster than anything Mary owns.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jun 2013
      Location
      West Blocton, Al
      Posts
      151
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for the response, if anyone would know how to set up a stock subframe second gen it would be a Pozzi. I'll start there.

      What are your thought on a rear sway bar? needed or not?

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jul 2011
      Location
      Istanbul / Turkey
      Posts
      76
      Country Flag: Turkey
      On my 2nd gen with ridetech triangulated 4 link, i'm not running any swaybar. Eventhough the my engine's got brutal torque, there's no knife's edge feeling. The rear end is so smooth and controllable unless You want to lose it. Running 305s on all corners.rear qa1s have soft spring rate (175-200 don't remember exactly)
      Als on my 4th gen with everything UMI underneath, i wasn't able to control the rearend as with my 2nd gen. (34mm front 21rear) Whatever i did, the rear end swing was so uncontrollable. And the car had the tendency to let go by the mid turn. First i had cut the swaybar chassis mounts about an inch, the swing reduced but was still there. I was about to take it off if i hadn't sold it. So lack of rear sway bar works better for me.
      Being handsome is only skin deep. But Badass goes to the bone.
      Mert Celet




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com