Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 14 of 14

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Posts
      59

      Does a triangulate 4 link allow the rear end to move laterally?

      ....such as the CA 4 link or ride tech 4 link? Car is 1968 camaro. I want to run super wide tires with a dse mini tub and rolled fenders. I want zero lateral movement. Should I just go with a watts like instead?



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,821
      Country Flag: United States
      It should not move. That is the idea behind the triangulated bars.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    3. #3
      Join Date
      May 2010
      Location
      kitchener,Ontario,Canada
      Posts
      2,355
      Country Flag: Canada
      What Don said , shouldn't move , much ...look at eg 70 chevelle triangulated 4 link and a sway bar are the only thing holding the rear in the car
      Spinnin'my tires in life's fast lane

      Ryan Austin
      On twitter ... soon to be revived ...
      On Instagram ryanaustinss70

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Lawrenceburg, TN
      Posts
      4,098
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by rp0029 View Post
      ....such as the CA 4 link or ride tech 4 link? Car is 1968 camaro. I want to run super wide tires with a dse mini tub and rolled fenders. I want zero lateral movement. Should I just go with a watts like instead?
      no...by design, but rims flex, chassis flex, the axle shafts have flex....and so on.....so you will see movement or rub if you build in tolerance's to panels to tight, also....a watts is not zero movement...

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Posts
      59
      That's the question. What are the tolerances for a 4 link? I am sure there is much less than with the old leaf springs. It 1/4" too close?

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Posts
      107
      i've got 335's on my mini tub and they fit perfect perfect without rolling the fender lip. Just get good back spacing measurements. Not sure if your going bigger.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,821
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Chuck0379 View Post
      i've got 335's on my mini tub and they fit perfect perfect without rolling the fender lip. Just get good back spacing measurements. Not sure if your going bigger.
      On a 67/68 or do you have a 69? There is a difference. 315 is just about max for a 67/68 as far as I know.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Lawrenceburg, TN
      Posts
      4,098
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by rp0029 View Post
      That's the question. What are the tolerances for a 4 link? I am sure there is much less than with the old leaf springs. It 1/4" too close?
      the tire will flex more than a 1/4

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Nov 2016
      Location
      Sulphur, La
      Posts
      612
      Only very little movement allowed by bushing deflection (assuming bushings are used)

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Fredericksburg, VA.
      Posts
      3,163
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm running 335's on my mini-tubbed 68 with a Chassisworks G-Link triangulated 4 link which is equipped with rod ends not bushings. I have seen no evidence of lateral movement of the rear end and I have done autocrosses and track days with this car.
      Steve Hayes
      "Dust Off"
      68 Camaro

      Support the RPM Act
      https://www.sema.org/rpm-faq.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Posts
      59
      There's a build on here where a guy claims to have a 14" rim with a 345 tire. He has a 4 link, but 8.75 backspace and a narrow rear. Hoping to do something similar.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Nov 2012
      Location
      Sacramento, CA
      Posts
      1,918
      Country Flag: United States
      There is lateral movement on triangulated 4-links with articulation. I used to not think so ... then a client friend mocked it up & tested it. Sure enough. As you articulate the housing the rear end moves off center.


    13. #13
      Join Date
      Oct 2010
      Location
      Sacramento, CA
      Posts
      246
      Country Flag: United States
      Plus there is lateral movement if one tire rises and the other doesn't. Like entering a driveway, as the inside tire lifts first, I get rubbing on the top inside edge of the inner wheel well. This is with standard wheel wells on a 69 with a 275-40/17 tire.

      Rick
      Rick - 1969 Camaro - LS1 driven daily

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      3,028
      Country Flag: United States
      You need minimum 3/4" to the inside, on that car you can run a 1/4" clearance on the outside as it doesn't sound like this is a car that will turn wheels in anger.
      Donny

      Support your local hot rod shop!




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com