Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      San Diego, CA
      Posts
      166

      1st Gen F-Body body mounts. . .stock vs. 1/2 height???

      I'm getting ready to order new body mounts for my 1967 Firebird (prepping to start using it for auto-X) and I'm wondering what is the advantage of using the 1/2 height DSE solid mounts vs. the stock height DSE solid mounts?Is there an actual handling difference between the two (theoretically lowering the roll height/CoG by 1/2")?Or is this just a visual/aesthetic preference? If so, do the 1/2 height mounts make much of a visual difference?Lastly, will using 1/2 height mounts result in more work for me down the road? I.e., all the sudden this, that, and the other start to not fit anymore and I have to start custom fitting everything?I don't mind the work, but I'm not at that stage of a build yet. . .right now I'm just doing basic bolt-on upgrades to improve the suspension, steering, and braking systems so that I can get out and drive instead of spending all my time trying to fit stuff onto the car. . .

      '67 Pontiac Firebird 400 RA
      http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7693

      '97 Camaro
      '00 Yamaha R6
      '01 Aprilia RS-50
      '02 Yamaha R1


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,876
      Country Flag: United States
      Half height mounts will mess up the stock steering column/rag joint connection. I am not 100% certain but I am going to guess the same for stock clutch linkage.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      San Diego, CA
      Posts
      166
      Quote Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
      Half height mounts will mess up the stock steering column/rag joint connection.
      Hmmm, so I would have to do some custom work to the steering linkage then. . .doesn't sound like something I want to tackle at this very moment. Unless it was as simple as there is enough room to loosen set screws in a couple places and let the steering shaft slide in/out to accommodate the change, but I'm guessing that is doubtful. . .a 1/2" would be quite a bit of adjustment for stock steering shaft components.
      Quote Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
      I am not 100% certain but I am going to guess the same for stock clutch linkage.Don
      Auto (boo) right now so that wouldn't be a problem at the moment, but would down the line since I plan on swapping in a T56 sometime in the future.
      '67 Pontiac Firebird 400 RA
      http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7693

      '97 Camaro
      '00 Yamaha R6
      '01 Aprilia RS-50
      '02 Yamaha R1

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Milwaukee, WI USA
      Posts
      440
      Country Flag: United States
      Don't mess around and use shorter mounts... you're just asking for trouble.
      Including some of those mentioned above... also issues with the fan hitting the shroud.
      1969 Camaro SS, 350(NOM), M21, 12 Bolt Posi, 01B (Jan 69) LOS Build

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,876
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by atomicjoe23 View Post
      Hmmm, so I would have to do some custom work to the steering linkage then. . .doesn't sound like something I want to tackle at this very moment. Unless it was as simple as there is enough room to loosen set screws in a couple places and let the steering shaft slide in/out to accommodate the change, but I'm guessing that is doubtful. . .a 1/2" would be quite a bit of adjustment for stock steering shaft components.Auto (boo) right now so that wouldn't be a problem at the moment, but would down the line since I plan on swapping in a T56 sometime in the future.
      T56 uses a hydraulic clutch so no issue there.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      dallas, tx
      Posts
      1,731
      Country Flag: United States
      Half height mounts are only there to help you if you don't have enough adjustment on the subframe to lower it lower. Tunnel clearance, steering column shaft, headers, crossmember, are just a few issues that you will run into

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      San Diego, CA
      Posts
      166
      Thanks for all the input guys!

      GREATLY appreciated and you probably just saved me a TON of headaches and frustration!!!
      '67 Pontiac Firebird 400 RA
      http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7693

      '97 Camaro
      '00 Yamaha R6
      '01 Aprilia RS-50
      '02 Yamaha R1

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Templeton, CA
      Posts
      561
      Country Flag: United States
      I'll reiterate what was said above... do not use them!! Ask me how I know.
      Robert
      My sloooow build thread...https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...hlight=Orngasm

      "If happiness is in your destiny, you need not be in a hurry."

      If I can only convince myself of this!

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      Katy,TX
      Posts
      1,678
      Also loose carb to hood clearance as it drops the body down on the motor. Real important for us with Shaker hoods or even early Firebirds with Ram Air pans. Might have fan to shroud issues also if the core support gets dropped as most do also. I used them on my TA and went back to full thickness.
      1978 Black Trans Am 455 Edelbrock heads [email protected] through mufflers on pump gas
      1981 Trans Am 400 stock type motor
      79 Camaro getting a 500" 695 hp IA2 Pontiac motor
      1965 GTO project car
      470ci/Chevy dual quad 409 604 HP 64 Impala SS project
      2004 Pulse Red GTO

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Posts
      186
      I've had my 69 Camaro about 27 years now and ran the old Herb Adams solid mounts for quite a long time. (over 7000 miles with them) These were actually composed of what looked like half height mounts, but the rear mounts were slightly taller and thus angled the front of the subframe upwards. It was enough of an angle that the radiator core support sat directly on the subframe. They claimed about an inch drop at the wheels with this kit. I never had any issues with steering connection alignment at the rag joint, nor any difficulty aligning fenders. The header collector on one side had to be heated and bent down because the flange hit the underside of the pan. Suspension was mostly stock... H-O springs and the Guldstrand mod. The only headache I can remember aside from the headers was trying to replace the oil pan gaskets without pulling the motor. There's very little room to lift the motor before it contacts the trans tunnel. I have the car completely torn down now and will be changing the the subframe mounts because I'm can't fit a T56 with the shorter mounts.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com