Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 15 of 15

    Threaded View

    1. #12
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      This data comes from a Stack MFR (multi-function recorder), with their brake pressure sensor. And you're right: it is expensive.



      Yes, the data is plucked around points of max G, and I tried to threshold on the edge of ABS, but it was difficult with kit2. Here's a response from the manufacturer of kit1 (Wilwood... from this morning):

      Quote Originally Posted by Wilwood
      You're absolutely correct, the coefficient of friction on a C/SiC rotor simply isn't there. Our experience is that there is no pad that can create a Mu that matches a cast iron rotor. The problem is that C/SiC is slippery. That's one reason why all of the manufacturers that put C/SiC rotors on their cars from the factory use a 15" disc. They're really trying to create brake torque by increasing the lever length. All of these reasons are why people don't usually race on C/SiC rotors. The reduced weight is really their only benefit. If you're looking for ultimate brake torque, it's hard to beat a cast iron rotor with our Polymatrix A compound pad squeezing it.

      All that being said, as you can see the C/SiC gets the car stopped with the same level of deceleration, it just takes more PSI in the caliper to get there.
      Last edited by parsonsj; 12-10-2015 at 08:14 AM.
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com