Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 12 of 12

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Apr 2013
      Posts
      140
      Country Flag: United States

      Zero to 60 times.....Seriously?

      http://carsandcoffeetalk.blogspot.co...e-changin.html




      Take a look at my latest blog article and see just how fast cars are these days?? You will be surprised at the results!
      Thanks, Joseph
      Check out my New Automotive Blog here:
      http://carsandcoffeetalk.blogspot.com/


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2013
      Posts
      140
      Country Flag: United States
      Nobody impressed with the list??
      Thanks, Joseph
      Check out my New Automotive Blog here:
      http://carsandcoffeetalk.blogspot.com/

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Lawrenceburg, TN
      Posts
      4,098
      Country Flag: United States
      I don't have a response to that, sure 0-60 is cool but if the car looks like a dishwasher (no style or flair) I don't want it and no amount of Hype makes the car better

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2013
      Posts
      140
      Country Flag: United States
      I do see your point, but you have to respect the times of cars today, and that's what my article was about.......thanks!
      Thanks, Joseph
      Check out my New Automotive Blog here:
      http://carsandcoffeetalk.blogspot.com/

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2011
      Location
      North Platte,NE
      Posts
      876
      Country Flag: United States
      Technology has went a long way, put todays tires on any of those old musclecars and todays cars would'nt look near as good.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Waterloo, Ia
      Posts
      1,408
      Yeah.

      New cars are fast.....and really expensive......and not very nice to look at.....and impossible to work on without specialized stuff. At the end of the day no one looks at a Volvo or a Taurus SHO or a Subaru WRX and says "thats f'ing badass right there" The numbers are impressive and they handle lightyears better without arguement....but like 72BBswinger just said, if you put good tires on these old cars the numbers would probably be a lot different.
      -Nick
      -1967 GTO I drive and race
      -Build threads:
      -http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
      -https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread


    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      2,670
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 72BBSwinger View Post
      Technology has went a long way, put todays tires on any of those old musclecars and todays cars would'nt look near as good.
      Exactly what I was thinking! Muscle car era bias ply tires are no match for modern rubber. Today's DOT 200 treadwear tires probably have more grip than race slicks from back in the day.
      Herb

      1966 El Camino LS408/T56Magnum
      1966 Chevelle 509/T56Magnum
      1963 C10 454/4L80

      PHR CHP CHP youtube


    8. #8
      Join Date
      Apr 2013
      Posts
      140
      Country Flag: United States
      Legit points.......thanks for the feedback guys!
      Thanks, Joseph
      Check out my New Automotive Blog here:
      http://carsandcoffeetalk.blogspot.com/

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Ewing, NJ
      Posts
      407
      Country Flag: United States
      You can admire the performance of a Bugatti Veyron but that doesn't fix it being a gastly looking thing (inside and out) or that the driving position and site lines are terrible for an average sized person. You can admire the straightline performance of the new Hellcat but the question of handling is conspicuous in it's absence. You can admire the ZL1 Camaro for it's all around performance if you can justify living with mullet jokes at Corvette prices. The GTR is a fantastically quick and well balance car without the slightest hint of soul in styling or ride.

      My point is that there seems to be a serious lack of all around cars for the masses. It's certainly not a new thing as manufacturers seem to have been drifting away from simple since the dawn of time. At any given price point that us normal folks can afford there are sacrifices to be made but I have to wonder how much less we would all have to give up in the fun department if at least the domestic brands gave up on solving everything by making the cars heavier and larger. It is the sacrificing of simple, nimble, fun cars in the name of badges, retro looks, and 7 ton pimp rims on the showroom floor.

      It is not a situation exclusive to the domestic muscle car market. Take ever the historically super fun little hatchbacks. The first generation Golf GTi was lighter than the original Beetle, the latest generation weighs almost the same as the 91 Camaro RS I drove in college.

      The above is not endorsed by management, it is merely the ramblings of probably the least fancy guy you will ever meet. lol

      -Tim
      NJSPEEDER - Tim Mullaney
      New Jersey F-body Owners Association
      www.NJFBOA.org
      NJ's home for all owners, friends, and fans of Camaros and Firebirds

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      Alabama
      Posts
      549
      Country Flag: United States
      Joseph I just realized you are located in Athens al...i live in florence....cool blog by the way
      David Butler
      "If you're not first, you're last"
      67 Camaro Twin Turbo SBC (changing from Blow-thru to Holley HP EFI)

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Apr 2013
      Posts
      140
      Country Flag: United States
      LOL.......yep, small world........thanks!!
      Thanks, Joseph
      Check out my New Automotive Blog here:
      http://carsandcoffeetalk.blogspot.com/

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Novi Mi
      Posts
      143
      Country Flag: United States
      The weight of cars has increased, but so have the crash standards which drive a lot of the structure through out the vehicle. Having to have impact zones within the B-pillar, etc. has a sandwich of several formed plates all needing to fit together to be able to stop that side-impact (any direction really).

      I have a 240z from 1973, and it is a project, so the plastic for the interior is all stripped out. I wouldn't like to see that after an accident that you would walk away from in modern cars. I plan to make it safer, but stock form doesn't give much security.

      Food for thought, check out different parts of the world and the weight of similar cars in those markets. Bet the US weight'ed cars are the heaviest of all the sister cars for the global companies.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com