Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 8 of 8
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Raleigh, NC
      Posts
      466

      AN-6 or AN-8 line for my fuel line?

      We are running a mild LS1 in the 68 Camaro we are building and I am trying to figure out which fuel line would be best.

      Walbro has donated a GSL392 fuel pump for the project and they need to know whether I need AN-6 or AN-8 fittings on the pump.

      I am thinking AN-6 is adequate, am I right?

      Bryan



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Raleigh, NC
      Posts
      466
      I'm starting to think AN-8 is my choice. Might as well go big in case Shawn wants to bump up the power at some point.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2001
      Location
      Wilton, CA. (Sacramento)
      Posts
      2,995
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 4birdman
      I'm starting to think AN-8 is my choice. Might as well go big in case Shawn wants to bump up the power at some point.
      exactly. There's very little price difference. I use 1/2" (#8 hardline) for all my builds.

      Jody

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      San Antonio, Tx
      Posts
      1,193
      6AN will support 900 rwhp with the right pump.
      Instagram: CamaroAJ

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,839
      Country Flag: United States
      -6 will easily support your needs and be easier and less expensive to plumb.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Detroit Subs
      Posts
      201
      I believe -6 will support the power, but -8 is so much easier to assemble that it may be worth it to go that way.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Posts
      63
      Most of us go through this dilemma when configuring AN fuel systems. The truth is -6 is plenty for most applications and can handle at least 750 HP naturally aspirated engines. That being said, myself included, I like the idea of -8 for the possibility of upgrading to say maybe a Procharger or other forced induction components.
      BE different....ACT normal.

      No one is completely useless..They can always be used as a bad example

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      294
      Country Flag: United States
      I went with 6an teflon hose. It really makes a difference on gas fumes after the rubber hose is a couple years old. I plot my fuel pressure in the data monitor and never a problem. However mine is only 540 horse.
      Tom




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com