Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 24
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      295
      Country Flag: Canada

      Tires for 2nd Gen Firebird

      Just getting ready to order tires (Nitto 555s) for my 71 bird and wanted any useful input about tire size.

      I'm thinking of going 255/45/18 on the front and 295/45/18 on the rear.

      What do you think? Any input would be greatly appreciated.

      Andy Pooni


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      OKC, OK
      Posts
      3,739
      Country Flag: United States
      295's are really pushing it with leaf rear. If you are running a bar or torque arm, plenty of room. 255 up front should be fine
      Mike Redpath
      Musclerodz & Customz
      405-288-0189
      pro-touring parts specialists
      Musclerodz.com

      facebook page
      http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Mus...73054649402015
      instagram
      Musclerodz

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Little Rock, Arkansas
      Posts
      945
      I'm running a 295/35/18 on a 10 inch wheel and a 255/35/18 on an 8 inch wheel on my 74TA. I did have to pound down the seat belt bulge and roll the fender lips on the rear for the 295. I'd run 255s on my 15 inch wheels up front and had some rub on the sway bar due to deflection. Not so much with the 35 aspect ratio but I've not really driven it much on these wheels and tires yet. It wasn't bad enough on the front to warrent me making any changes back in the day.

      Keep me posted on how you like those tires. Those are exactly what I was looking at. I want a taller sidewall.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      295
      Country Flag: Canada
      Keep me posted on how you like those tires. Those are exactly what I was looking at. I want a taller sidewall.[/QUOTE]


      Will do. Thanks for the response.
      Andy Pooni

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Little Rock, Arkansas
      Posts
      945
      Typo corrected. That was a 10 inch wheel. I don't think I could get a 19 under there even with mini-tubs! LOL.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Corona, CA
      Posts
      1,948
      Country Flag: United States
      I agree with Mike, that is a lot of tire under a leaf spring car. And that damn seat belt bulge does get in the way. We run 10s often, with a 285, but that big a tire might get a little too big.

      Check out our ebay store for Nitto Tire pricing. We pretty much sell nitto a few dollar over wholesale.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      295
      Country Flag: Canada
      So I like how the 295s filled the wheel well, but it seems like they may be too wide. Does anyone make a 28" tire in a narrower width?
      Andy Pooni

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      stanwood, wa
      Posts
      324
      i had 17x11's on the back of my 73 with 315's and had no problems. 6" bs and did nothing with the seat belts. I can't see a 295/18 being any tighter.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      earlier cars fit a bigger tire and all cars are different.


      vince
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    10. #10
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      295
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by a73formula View Post
      i had 17x11's on the back of my 73 with 315's and had no problems. 6" bs and did nothing with the seat belts. I can't see a 295/18 being any tighter.
      Thanks. How tall were your 315s?
      Andy Pooni

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      1,086
      Country Flag: United States
      I've got 255/45/18s up front and 295/40/18s out back on my car.
      18x8 and 18x10. A 295/35/18 will fit with stock leafs out back!
      A 295/45/18 out back is a really tall tire! My wheels come in right at 27" tall FWIW...
      SMSgt Ty Ingle, USAF
      "CF71" - Freedom Bird
      Hoodpins.com, Inland Empire Driveline, Billet Accessories Direct, Modo Innovations, AutoRad Radiators, Morris Classic Concepts, Marquez Design, Anvil Auto, Fesler Billet, US Collision (DOOM), AGR Performance, Pro-touringF-body.com, Phoenix Transmission Products, Shiftworks, ACC Carpet, Hedman Hedders, BMR Fabrication, American Autowire, MityMounts, TIN INDIAN Performance, Kauffman Racing Equipment, Pypes, RobbMc Performance, WMC, Holley, NOS, PST

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      295
      Country Flag: Canada
      Thanks Ty.
      Andy Pooni

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Corona, CA
      Posts
      1,948
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by a73formula View Post
      i had 17x11's on the back of my 73 with 315's and had no problems. 6" bs and did nothing with the seat belts. I can't see a 295/18 being any tighter.
      Probably a 315/35/17, right? Way shorter than a 295/45/18.

      We run into this with a lot of A body guys and 2nd Gen F-body guys. A 315/35/17 is only 25.6" tall, so its extremely short, and when the radius is that close to the center of the axle, things fit differently as it moves the widest part of the tire closer to the center of the axle.

      A 295/45/18 on the other hand is 28.31" tall. With that, we're talking about the radius from center to the top of the tire being much greater than the above, and the wider portion of the tire sits much higher in the wheel well.

      Personally, on the back of a 2nd gen, I like to see a 27" tall tire. I'd suggest the 285/40/18. 27" on the dot. Sweet, Safe, and will FIT.
      Last edited by DriverzInc; 04-28-2010 at 09:04 AM.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Little Rock, Arkansas
      Posts
      945
      OK, so what's your most popular tire to run in a 285 out back and a 255 up front. Keep in mind that I want a little more sidewall height because I simply do not like the looks of these 35s on my car. Will a 40 look substantially different?

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      295
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by DriverzInc View Post
      Probably a 315/35/17, right? Way shorter than a 295/45/18.

      We run into this with a lot of A body guys and 2nd Gen F-body guys. A 315/35/17 is only 25.6" tall, so its extremely short, and when the radius is that close to the center of the axle, things fit differently as it moves the widest part of the tire closer to the center of the axle.

      A 295/45/18 on the other hand is 28.31" tall. With that, we're talking about the radius from center to the top of the tire being much greater than the above, and the wider portion of the tire sits much higher in the wheel well.

      Personally, on the back of a 2nd gen, I like to see a 27" tall tire. I'd suggest the 285/40/18. 27" on the dot. Sweet, Safe, and will FIT.
      You guys made me rethink my original plan and am going to go 255/45/18 and 285/40/18. Thanks for confirming.
      Andy Pooni

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Mar 2007
      Location
      Florida
      Posts
      2,391
      Country Flag: United States
      Jon is right about the widths and heights affecting the fitment. The early 2nd gen birds have the most tire space stock of all the 2nd gens. I've run the 315 35 17's for several years and they were fine (for me on my car,70 bird), but I recommended to a lot of folks not to try it on their cars due to variables such as weight, suspension, and usage.

      I didn't have any rubbing issues (with no wheelwell mods) until I added about 200 lbs of roll cage. Then I got a slight rub which only occured under certain conditions, only on track, and only with a passenger, and only if I hit the curbing too hard. (hehe novice! LOL) I am switching to 295 30 18's this year and I'm going to try to run a 285 30 18 in the front (up from the 275 40 17's I have). I know I'll loose a little more turning radius but I don't need the tight turning for what I do with the car. I don't use the car for things that require tight tuirning so it doesn't bother me. Fronts rubbed the sway before at full lock with the 275's.

      As far as looks go I like the proportions of cars like Tys with taller tires that fill the wheelwells more. 26" tires like the ones I use look a little small. I have the new Yokohama AO 48 tires already. I'm waiting on brakes so I can be sure I get the correct backspacing for the new Rushforth wheels.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Corona, CA
      Posts
      1,948
      Country Flag: United States
      Run a 285/40/18 rear in a 555. At 27" tall, you're talking about a good looking sidewall. In the front, I usually run a 245/40/18. The difference in width from a 245 to a 255 is only .25", but they are taller, which is the important thing, and look right at home on an 8" wide wheel. The next size up is the 245/45/18 and is 26.5 tall, only a .50" difference between the rear tire at 27" tall, and I usually like more of a difference than that from front to rear.

      FYI, we have ALL of our Nitto tires in our EBAY store online, and our pricing is VERY, VERY good. And all the information about each tire can be found in the listings. Driverz Inc Ebay Store

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by DriverzInc View Post
      Run a 285/40/18 rear in a 555. At 27" tall, you're talking about a good looking sidewall. In the front, I usually run a 245/40/18. The difference in width from a 245 to a 255 is only .25", but they are taller, which is the important thing, and look right at home on an 8" wide wheel.
      Did you mean a 255/40 on the front? Stock was 225/70R15 which is a 27.3" tire. People used to upgrade to 255/60R15s which is a 27.1" tire. http://www.78ta.com/banditedition.php

      A 245/40R18 at 25.7" is not going to fill the wheel well and look strange. Even the 255/40 at 26.1" would look a bit too short. Personally I think they look best with the 255/45R18 (which is also the same sidewall height as the 285/40R18). But if you wanted a slightly shorter sidewall the 245/45R18 would be the best compromise IMHO.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      1,086
      Country Flag: United States

      Falken Tires

      Falken makes a 295/40/18 that IMHO is the perfect tire for the back of a 2nd Gen Firebird/Trans Am. I run their 615-series tires on my car... 200-tread rating and a unique tread design. The 295/40/18 is 27.3" tall and the 255/45/18s I have up front are 27.0" FWIW.
      Attached Images Attached Images        
      SMSgt Ty Ingle, USAF
      "CF71" - Freedom Bird
      Hoodpins.com, Inland Empire Driveline, Billet Accessories Direct, Modo Innovations, AutoRad Radiators, Morris Classic Concepts, Marquez Design, Anvil Auto, Fesler Billet, US Collision (DOOM), AGR Performance, Pro-touringF-body.com, Phoenix Transmission Products, Shiftworks, ACC Carpet, Hedman Hedders, BMR Fabrication, American Autowire, MityMounts, TIN INDIAN Performance, Kauffman Racing Equipment, Pypes, RobbMc Performance, WMC, Holley, NOS, PST

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      That Bird looks awesome!

      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com