Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 24
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      14

      anybody running a "reverse stagger" wheel combo?

      I don't know if that's even what you'd call it, I think I just made that term up... Basically what I'm talking about is something like 17" rims in the front with a low profile, good handling radial like a 275/40-17, and then 15" rims in the rear with a "decent" handling radial, but much better for acceleration, like a 325/50-15. This would give an overall tire height of 25.7" in the front and 27.8" in the rear which should give the car a good stance. My idea is to allow a bigger sidewall in the rear to aid traction yet keep a better performing tire up front for quick braking and steering (i.e. no skinnies on 15" rims!!). Everywhere I look, though, I see guys talking about running larger diameter rims on the rear, which is the opposite of what I'm thinking. Has anybody tried or seen something like this? I see that Weld and others make rims that you can get the same style in 15" - 18" so I was thinking about giving it a shot. Car would be a 2nd gen camaro. Anybody got any pics of something similar?

      Thanks!
      Jeff



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Severn, MD
      Posts
      405
      Don't know if this helps, but I remember this car featured in Super Chevy last year. This nomad has 20's on the front and 18's on the rear

      http://www.superchevy-web.com/featur...mad/index.html

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      14
      Thanks man, that is at least in the same realm of what I was thinking. The main difference being that both his fronts and rears are pretty low profile, I'm looking to do a low profile front and a regular profile rear. Just trying to visualize how this would all look on a 2nd gen camaro. I'm not a photoshop wizard so I'm still searching for the real thing :-)

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      NW Arkansas
      Posts
      1,742
      It would look like you could only afford front wheels.......I guess I understand your idea but I just don't think it would look good at all.....plus you can get an R rated 17 in a 40 or 45 series sidewall do you realll need more than that?
      KENNY DAVIS HOTRODS

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Mantorville, MN
      Posts
      835
      Country Flag: United States
      I really doubt this will help you, but 1909-1918 Model T's came that way from the factory. 24" wheels in front and 23" wheels in the rear with 30" rubber on all 4... so if someone starts giving you crap about it, just say you got the idea from Ford.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      IL/TN
      Posts
      908
      Country Flag: United States
      I see where you are going with it it is not a bad Idea the only problem will be that the back will feel very loose and could be dangerous if pushed hard, the front will react much faster than the rear.
      https://www.protouringf-body.com "doing what they say can't be done"

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      14
      the issue here is that I'm going to have a 1500hp turbo small block under the hood so I *need* a real tire on the back to help with straight line traction... I realize I'm giving up some cornering ability, but it would still have to be worlds better than having a 15" rim and "skinnies" on the front in terms of terrible braking and steering. So I was thinking that the 17's in the front and 15's in the rear might be a nice combo... If I had 18's or 19's in the front, I think it would start looking weird, but do you think 17's to 15's would even stand out as being all that different?

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      NW Arkansas
      Posts
      1,742
      you won't hook 1500hp on the street anyway will you????? maybe you just need two sets of wheels???? just my .02cents
      KENNY DAVIS HOTRODS

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      14
      with 345/50-15 drag radials and a similar motor (but small block ford) we run 1.3x 60' times tripping the lights with the back tires (i.e. wheelie time)... 8.20's @ 173... and, it hooks like crazy on the street... Obviously at 10mph I won't be able to make use of the full 1500hp, but my electronics allow the boost to increase as vehicle speed increases which always keeps the car on the edge of traction throughout the speed range... On my last camaro I had the two sets of wheels and tires thing, but that never fully achieved what I wanted. I needed the slicks in the rear even for street driving but I hated the way the skinnies felt up front. I didn't have a single style of rims where I could run big in the front and small in the rear so I always had to choose one complete set or another (back then weld, centerline, etc. didn't make 17" rims in styles that were also available in 15" sizes, or if they did I never saw them).

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      NW Arkansas
      Posts
      1,742
      ya I guess if you can control the boost you could make some use of it....

      do you have pics of the car...if so post them in multimedia and ask someone to photo chop it for you?
      KENNY DAVIS HOTRODS

    11. #11
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      I have 15" Daggers with drag radials for the drag strip, but I run 17"s on all four corners the rest of the time.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Long Island, NY
      Posts
      11,320
      Country Flag: United States
      I think I would search for pics of guys who normally run 17s or 18s on the street because of large brakes, and switch to 15s in the rear for the drag strip. I know Andrew Borodin had some pics of his GTO like this from when he hit to the strip. IMHO, it's going to look, well...odd. I would go with one or the other, either run some wide 15s up front and the 15s out back, or run 17s all the way around with a large sidewall in the rear.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Severn, MD
      Posts
      405
      Consider running 16's up front; you can still get a lower profile tire, but will be less of a visual difference. I'm running 16's on my 2nd gen camaro (front and rear) because I didn't want to go with the big wheel look, but wanted to improve the handling and to make room for 12" rotors.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      Georgetown,TX
      Posts
      2,557
      I've seen 325/50/15 drag radials but who makes a 345/50/15?

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      14
      sorry, i fat fingered that, they are BFG comp t/a drag radials in 345/55-15 size...


      http://www.bfgoodrichtires.com/asset...rag_radial.pdf

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      Georgetown,TX
      Posts
      2,557
      Quote Originally Posted by HiBoost
      sorry, i fat fingered that, they are BFG comp t/a drag radials in 345/55-15 size...
      No problem. Do you have room to fit a 14.6" wide x 30" tall tire?
      Has your Camaro been backhalved?

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      14
      nothing has been done to the camaro yet, i'm trying to get the "whole game plan" together before I do anything... I'm thinking that some kind of 4-link w/mini tubs in the rear and a modern front suspension with coilovers and good brakes up front is where I want to be...

      As far as that 345/55 tire, I wouldn't necessarily be running that tire, that's just what's on the mustang and it works well on the street... MT's new ET radials are supposed to hook much better than the bfg's, the world's fastest drag radial car ran 7.80's in the 1/4 on M/T 295 tires and 7.60's on M/T 315 tires!! The drag radials are definitely no joke...

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      NW Arkansas
      Posts
      1,742
      the DSE 4 link would work nice for the car and some dse deep tubs....the tubs will hold a 335/30-18 with no problem so they should hold a big R15 tire as well....
      KENNY DAVIS HOTRODS

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,983
      Country Flag: United States
      i believe mickey thompson is now making a 17 or 16 in drag radial. this could allow you to run a 16 or 17 in the rear with a 17 on the front. i think that would look better than the 15s on the back with 17s on the front. the only thing to still worry about is if you can get enough sidewall to allow good flexing for drag launches without making it too thick and giving you a prostreet stance. just a thought
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      New York City
      Posts
      297
      Remember Bumongus (I think that's how you speel it)? It was that hugh Buick that Troy built way back when. That had 17s on the front and hugh Pro Street 15s in the rear. If you go to his web site there may be a picture there. The car was in every magazine in the free world when he did it. Maybe someone can find some pictures and post them. Troy did it and nobody complained - but not my taste. Find some of those new M/Ts in 17s or 18s and be done with it.

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com