Art Morrison Front w/ TCI or AME rear on a '69 Camaro?

[Decline]

Looking opinions on the matter. The car in question is my 1969 Camaro with a 350 engine and trans with a 8.2 10 bolt rear

I already have a Art Morrison front sub and a TCI rear torque arm with subframe connects that have been modified to work with the AME front clip.

Its getting close to my install date and I was having second thoughts about not going full AME front and rear.
Other than the possible extra rigidity of having a "full frame" chassis with the AME what other benefits would I expect for the extra $?



The AME does include a ford 9" which I would have to upgrade my axle eventally anyway
Would my 8.2 be able to handle an autoX or streets of willow day without blowing up? I curremtly only have around 250hp, maybe even less?

Thoughts?

[Decline]

Ha, nobody wanted to touch this one... I stand by my torque arm decision
Decided a better use for the $ is a 9" floater

[David Pozzi]

The TCI will work. The advantage of going to an all Art Morrison system would be using their recommended spring rates, and sway bars. They have it all figured out already. The TCI will work and I'd start with their recommended springs and bars, and tune the suspension from there.