Results 21 to 40 of 45
Thread: Pontiac intake manifolds
-
08-24-2005 #21Starting The Transformation
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Greeley, Colorado
- Posts
- 485
I've spoken with Jim Butler a couple months back. He recomended the XE284H grind.
Here's the specs on that grind.
Cam Style: Hydraulic flat tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 2,300-6,500 RPM
Intake Duration 050 inch Lift: 240
Exhaust Duration 050 inch Lift: 246
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 240 int./246 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration: 284
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 296
Advertised Duration: 284 int./296 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.507
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.510
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.507 int./0.510 exh. lift
Lobe Separation (degrees): 110
Intake Valve Lash (in): 0.000
Exhaust Valve Lash (in): 0.000
Computer Controlled: No
Grind Number: P XE284H-10
Jason Mounce
1969 Firebird | 2008 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Mustang GT/CS
-
08-24-2005 #22Registered User- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Houston
- Posts
- 215
I was wrong about that cam, I thought it was a single pattern. I hope you do know not to twist that 455 past about 5500. What intake did Butler suggest with your combo.
Wick
'71 Camaro RS Project
08-24-2005 #23Starting The Transformation- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Greeley, Colorado
- Posts
- 485
He didn't actually suggest one. At the time I was planning on running the Torker II manifold.
What's the issue with the RPM? I could drop down to the 274H which has an 1800-6000 operating range.Jason Mounce
1969 Firebird | 2008 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Mustang GT/CS
08-24-2005 #24Registered User- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Houston
- Posts
- 215
I would stay with the one Butler suggested, those RPM numbers are mostly for the 400's. You can run a bigger cam in the 455 and get away with it.
The 455 has longer stroke coupled with 3.25 mains versus 3 inch mains with a 400. The rods are another issue. They are good but not great. I have seen a lot of low 12 second 455's that were shifted at 5200.Wick
'71 Camaro RS Project
08-24-2005 #25Starting The Transformation- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Greeley, Colorado
- Posts
- 485
It's unfortunate I don't have receipts for the engine build. The previous owner did say the rotating assembly was forged as well as balanced. Regardless it would probably still be a good idea to keep it under 5500 I would imagine.
Jason Mounce
1969 Firebird | 2008 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Mustang GT/CS
08-31-2005 #26Registered User- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Netherlands
- Posts
- 1,012
i have a dyno tested stroker 400 . eagle kit to 461 4.25 stroke, with port matchst torker II / XE284 / holly 850 ho aed / mild ported edel heads 2.19/1.77 valves 300 cfm / engine puts out 550 horse max rpm 6000 .. if you dont have 300 cfm heads with the "big valves" il would stay with the XE274 . performer rpm is a great manifold torkerII hase in some cases the advantige and no clearens problems . the origenal torkerII flows beter from the factory then victor/rpm/torker II .the new Tomawhawk manifold hase no clearens problem as wel . and in polished form is the best looker of them all . forgive mij spelling ...
ps standerd rods woned last long past 5500 rpm . a 400 stroker is a stronger combo then a 455 .
09-01-2005 #27Registered User- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Houston
- Posts
- 215
David, Did you dyno the Tomahawk intake? Did you use eagle rods or stock? What kind of toque numbers with you combo?
Wick
'71 Camaro RS Project
09-01-2005 #28Registered User- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Netherlands
- Posts
- 1,012
Originally Posted by wick
09-01-2005 #29Registered User- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Houston
- Posts
- 215
Thanks for the info David. What E-Heads did you use, the 72cc or 87cc chambers. From what I have seen with the new Tomahawk it is a good intake but not the best. Who built your motor?
Wick
'71 Camaro RS Project
09-01-2005 #30Registered User- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Netherlands
- Posts
- 1,012
Wick we used the edel heads 87 cc , but as my engine builder said dont belive anything before you chekt it as the heads where actualy 85cc !! my engine builder is non other then pontiac goeroo Jim Lehart aka MR p body from cebtral verginia mashine sirves . he wrote the short block part in the new must have Jim Hands book!! how to build high performance pontiac engines .in the back of the book he gives out varius engine combo,s as thus the butlers kaufman ecetera. Jim was very wel known in the late 60,s eurly 70,s in the california street wars beating up the competition in a time where there was disrespect for the Pontiac name plate . his 69 GTO took lots of scalps and actualy never lost from 454 chevelles 455 buicks ore olds with his 400 injun . he hase been working engines all his life in varius parts of the USA in diferend shops and places . he disided to get his own company about 4 years ago . altho the Butlers and the Kaufmans are the most wel known they are to big in my upinion to get that old fasion small touwn sirves .also if i buy a lets say Butler engine i dont thingk one of the Butlers actualy workt on it!!!. last pontiac in the park drag weekend in virginia 4 of the 7 engines that won where from his hands . annyway nobody but him would toutch my engine lololol .. if you go to performance years site then to there forums race/street ecetera select find then put his name in there mr p body . his posts will come forward . he always give free advice .his nolige is not limited to injun engines he hase won several best engine awards with mopar ford en chevy , but he is injun at hearth because he claims its the best street engine! . about the tomowhawk if you into the bling bling stuf a polished one with a aluminium valy pan would look the bisenis lololol .
09-02-2005 #31Registered User- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Houston
- Posts
- 215
David, a few more questions. Is that a 700R4 trans you are running? What kind of power steering pump and pullies are you useing?
Wick
'71 Camaro RS Project
09-02-2005 #32Starting The Transformation- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Greeley, Colorado
- Posts
- 485
That's a nice looking engine you've got going there David. Thanks for the information.
Due to hood clearance issues, I've decided I am going to run the Torker II manifold on the engine. Likely with an 800 cfm Thunder AVS carb on top. For the time being I'm sure if I will do a cam swap or not. I really want to go with a set of E-heads on the motor and may go with the new cam at that time.
I was really hoping to be able to make about 500 on the engine without having to almost completely build it again from the ground up. I don't think I'll be able to get there without the use of better heads however. It's just got a set of 72cc #62's on it right now.Jason Mounce
1969 Firebird | 2008 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Mustang GT/CS
09-02-2005 #33Registered User- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Houston
- Posts
- 215
JLM, 62's are some good heads. I have a friend that has them on his 474 without the dished pistons (about 12:1) and he is making some very power. 11.60's in a 4 speed '79 TA with no traction devices or weight reductions except removal of A/C components. Car even has T-Tops.
Did you find why it was running crappy the other day?Wick
'71 Camaro RS Project
09-02-2005 #34Starting The Transformation- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Greeley, Colorado
- Posts
- 485
Originally Posted by wick
I'm going to work on the engine this weekend after I get the fenders and valance hung on the car (getting close to paint now).
Pretty much what I want from this car is to run at least quicker than my 2003 Cobra that I had. It clicked off a [email protected] at Bandimere Speedway. From a power output I'd like to have enough to go atleast a 12.79.Jason Mounce
1969 Firebird | 2008 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Mustang GT/CS
09-02-2005 #35Registered User- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Netherlands
- Posts
- 1,012
Originally Posted by wick
09-02-2005 #36Registered User- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Netherlands
- Posts
- 1,012
Originally Posted by JLM
09-02-2005 #37Starting The Transformation- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Greeley, Colorado
- Posts
- 485
Originally Posted by Roadrage David
Is this the standard 4150 carbs?
Also would you go vacuum or mechanical secondaries? Car is a TH400 auto with a 3000rpm stall. in a 1969 Firebird coupe.Jason Mounce
1969 Firebird | 2008 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Mustang GT/CS
09-02-2005 #38Registered User- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Netherlands
- Posts
- 1,012
http://www.aedperformance.com/ here is the website of the real stuff lololol ... jlm for more tech info ore poncho injun perf parts http://www.centralvirginiamachine.com this is the man you need .....
09-14-2005 #39