Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 ... LastLast
    Results 21 to 40 of 247
    1. #21
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Location
      Detroit
      Posts
      2,585
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by SShep71 View Post
      Your better off with the LSx. I was going to build a 462 blown pontiac. By the time I would have built the motor the way it would be set up to handle the power, and still be reliable it would have cost me 10k. You can buy a 6.0 LS motor and just beefing it up a little you will have a great power plant with EFI. You dont need an LS3, a LY6 is cheap, a L92 is more expensive but worth it in the end. The big thing is the fuel system, but if you guys are up to it I have drawings for your own legit EFI stainless tank.
      You willing to share with non- UMI peeps?...lol

      Big dreams, small pockets....

      Chris--
      '72 Cutlass S LSA/T56 Magnum
      Bowler Performance, Rushforth Wheels, ATS, Holley EFI, KORE3, Ridetech

      Project Motor City Madness


    2. #22
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Waterloo, Ia
      Posts
      1,409
      Sell the rear on Performance years board. Call Quick Performance in Ames Iowa and get a nice 9" and be done with it.
      -Nick
      -1967 GTO I drive and race
      -Build threads:
      -http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
      -https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread


    3. #23
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      545
      I just got back from the body shop, the interior and the glass is out and the car is on the rotisserie.

      The floor boards in the car are in great shape, not a single hole. The car does need a drivers side quarter panel and driver door is rusted bad (see images). The quarter has been patched before so we will be replacing it. We also need inner and outer rear wheel wells on the drivers side. We are debating on a min-tub but not sure what to do with the rear seat yet.

















      Ryan
      UMI Performance
      www.umiperformance.com
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    4. #24
      Join Date
      Feb 2012
      Posts
      42
      Country Flag: Canada
      Nice project, can't wait to see the end result.
      Chrome won't get you home...

    5. #25
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      545
      Buck is making some more progress on the body at the body shop while we wait for parts to come in. We are replacing the driver side quarter and inner/outer wheel wells.

      On the passenger side we found out they don't make a patch panel for the quarter so we are going to have make one.













      Ryan
      UMI Performance
      www.umiperformance.com
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    6. #26
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Location
      The Piedmont Triad, NC
      Posts
      373
      Country Flag: United States
      minitub it!
      67 LeMans Convertible
      67 GTO
      69 Camaro Build Thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ost-Money-quot
      70 Chevelle 400 4spd
      70 Chevelle

    7. #27
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      California
      Posts
      793
      Country Flag: United States
      I would like to move to second the notion of minitubbing, all in favor? What are the plans for the frame?

    8. #28
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Location
      Ca
      Posts
      201
      Country Flag: United States
      [QUOTE=Novaguy73;962591]
      Quote Originally Posted by UMI Performance View Post
      We debated over this for a long time but decided to go with LS1 and T56.... Pontiac Firebirds and Transam had the LS in 98-02... does that still count as Pontiac powered? lolQUOTE]


      Nah not really but I cant say I blame you. It would have a lot more cool factor with the poncho for sure. Like you, Im going back and forth over building a 4.25 stroke 400 block Pontiac with some kauffman D ports and a hydraulic roller.....or do I just stick a damn LS in it? The price isnt too far apart from my rough estimate. To have a good Pontiac built with forged internals and done the right way youre looking at 10-12K. Im pretty sure a guy could do a boneyard LS3 transplant for around that and stick that new self learning fuel rail mounted LS fuel injection setup on it and be done??
      Keep it Pontiac powered! If you want an LS powered car... go build a newer Camaro or Corvette
      I kept my 67 Firebird Ponco powered and I love it! Sure I could of built a bad ass LS motor for the cost on a mild Pontiac but in my mind, if I'm not burning a bunch of fuel, dripping a little oil or shacking my neighbors walls at 6AM I'm not driving a 60's HotRod

    9. #29
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Waterloo, Ia
      Posts
      1,409
      Quote Originally Posted by KnightMare View Post
      minitub it!
      I agree. It would be pretty sweet to stick some 315's back there!
      -Nick
      -1967 GTO I drive and race
      -Build threads:
      -http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
      -https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread


    10. #30
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Waterloo, Ia
      Posts
      1,409
      [QUOTE=paint2361;965860]
      Quote Originally Posted by Novaguy73 View Post

      Keep it Pontiac powered! If you want an LS powered car... go build a newer Camaro or Corvette
      I kept my 67 Firebird Ponco powered and I love it! Sure I could of built a bad ass LS motor for the cost on a mild Pontiac but in my mind, if I'm not burning a bunch of fuel, dripping a little oil or shacking my neighbors walls at 6AM I'm not driving a 60's HotRod
      Yeah I know. Ive heard that a lot. Iv'e got a very mild 455/6X4's in the car right now. Ill probably just pull that down, port the heads, stick some cheap forged rods/pistons in it. Go with a small hydraulic roller/RPM/Q-Jet and keep it a fairly mild 475hp/550tq car. If I won the lotto I would be building an aluminum IAII 535 ....that would be badass......
      -Nick
      -1967 GTO I drive and race
      -Build threads:
      -http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
      -https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread


    11. #31
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      545
      Thanks for the comments everyone.

      We talked about mini-tubbing the car but decided against it. We would like too but decided not for a few reasons. One, we are trying to keep this car as "Pro-Budget" build, basically we are building a realistic car that most of our customers are and can build. We want to race a car that is bscially stock suspension with UMI upgrades. Also the rear seat in the car is extremely nice and we would like to haul passengers so we decided to leave it as is. We should be able to run a 285 or 295 rear tire in the rear.

      We have some more pictures coming soon! We are waiting for the frame to come back from sandblasting and the rear quarter to arrive.
      Ryan
      UMI Performance
      www.umiperformance.com
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    12. #32
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Waterloo, Ia
      Posts
      1,409
      Did you box the frame at all? I cruised through the pictures looking and half of them wouldnt come up so im not sure. In case you didnt, can I ask why not? If you were going to box a frame what gauge and type of steel would you use?
      -Nick
      -1967 GTO I drive and race
      -Build threads:
      -http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
      -https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread


    13. #33
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      Cedar Rapids, IA
      Posts
      999
      Quote Originally Posted by UMI Performance View Post
      Thanks for the comments everyone.

      We talked about mini-tubbing the car but decided against it. We would like too but decided not for a few reasons. One, we are trying to keep this car as "Pro-Budget" build, basically we are building a realistic car that most of our customers are and can build. We want to race a car that is bscially stock suspension with UMI upgrades. Also the rear seat in the car is extremely nice and we would like to haul passengers so we decided to leave it as is. We should be able to run a 285 or 295 rear tire in the rear.

      We have some more pictures coming soon! We are waiting for the frame to come back from sandblasting and the rear quarter to arrive.
      Subscribing.

      I like the exhaust you had. Looked like a 3" system. Looking forward to seeing the frame all finished and back together.

      I was going to say to say for most people on a pro-budget could not afford to go with a LS option, and building up what you have would make more sense finacialy, but I see that the original motor was a 350 not a 400 or bigger. So cost wise it would be a wash going with a built up pontiac vs going LS.

      My brother has a Stroker built 455 in his 69 GTO convertible. 290 CFM KRE heads and SD perfrormance old faithful cam. And a NOS system. 3" exhaust, 12 bolt 3:55 gear. Runs mid 11s. Its Loud, fast and fun but not much fun on a long cruise.

      On the flip side

      One of my cars is a 64 tempest convertible with a 326 2 speed, 2:56 rear that get 20mpg. It not fast and not much nice about it but I enjoy the heck out of it. More so then my much nicer 455 68 bird that I'm afraid to park anywhere.

      So each their own. Build it the way you want to drive it. I'm not apposed to the LS option. It will sure make cruising more enjoyable.
      Some times I'm fast sometimes I'm half-fast

    14. #34
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      545
      Quote Originally Posted by Novaguy73 View Post
      Did you box the frame at all? I cruised through the pictures looking and half of them wouldnt come up so im not sure. In case you didnt, can I ask why not? If you were going to box a frame what gauge and type of steel would you use?
      Hello, Sorry about the pictures. Photobucket is acting up on hosting our images so I am switching them over to our own server. He haven't boxed the frame yet but we are going to. The frame is currently out for sandblasting, as soon as it comes back we will begin boxing frame and we will be sure to post lots of pictures. We will most likely be using 1/8" or 3/16" steel for the boxing. Thanks for looking!

      Quote Originally Posted by rohrt View Post
      Subscribing.

      I like the exhaust you had. Looked like a 3" system. Looking forward to seeing the frame all finished and back together.

      I was going to say to say for most people on a pro-budget could not afford to go with a LS option, and building up what you have would make more sense finacialy, but I see that the original motor was a 350 not a 400 or bigger. So cost wise it would be a wash going with a built up pontiac vs going LS.
      Thanks for looking!

      The exhaust that was on the car was actually a pre-built Pypes kit and it was a 3" system. It was a nice system for the price.

      On the LS engine we tried to keep it as pro-budget as possible. The engine and transmission are both from a junk yard car with a 100K miles on them. With the price for the LS1 and T56 it would be a wash compared to building the 350 and adding a manual or overdrive transmission. So like you mentioned we actually kept the price down low by not building the LS engine or upgrading to an LS2, LS3 or similar. You can find the LS engines at a decent price in donor cars or online now a days.

      Your Tempest sounds awesome! Nice car... don't see many of them around
      Ryan
      UMI Performance
      www.umiperformance.com
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    15. #35
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      545
      Alright guys, now we are starting to get to the more exciting stuff! Our LS1 engine with T56 transmission just showed up from Hawks Third Generation Parts . Both items were removed from a 2000 donor car. When they pulled the transmission 2nd gear was stiff (usually is) so we had a Stage 2 rebuild done on the transmission before they shipped it.

      If anyone is looking for any type of LS engine I recommend contacting Hawks, I had the privilege to visit their facility over the summer and it is extremely nice and well organized. Although they specialize on 82-02 F-Body parts they have a full lot of donor LS cars.www.hawksthirdgenparts.com



      Ryan
      UMI Performance
      www.umiperformance.com
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    16. #36
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Location
      Detroit
      Posts
      2,585
      Country Flag: United States
      Looks like a good start. Should be fun car when done...
      Big dreams, small pockets....

      Chris--
      '72 Cutlass S LSA/T56 Magnum
      Bowler Performance, Rushforth Wheels, ATS, Holley EFI, KORE3, Ridetech

      Project Motor City Madness

    17. #37
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      545
      Drivers side rear quarter panel and wheelhouses came in today from Goodmark. Our frame should be back from sandblasting early next week. More updates coming soon!

      Ryan
      UMI Performance
      www.umiperformance.com
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    18. #38
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      545
      The frame is scheduled to be back from sandblasting today, we are excited to get it finished. In the meantime below shows the areas of the frame that need our attention. A few body mount holes need repaired and the previous owner did a few home repairs to the rear control arm mounts. It also appears they installed a new back section of the frame at one time.

      We will grind out all the old welds and re-weld the frame while boxing it in. Should look like new when we are complete.











      Ryan
      UMI Performance
      www.umiperformance.com
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    19. #39
      Join Date
      Jul 2010
      Location
      North Texas
      Posts
      60
      Quote Originally Posted by UMI Performance View Post
      The frame is scheduled to be back from sandblasting today, we are excited to get it finished. In the meantime below shows the areas of the frame that need our attention. A few body mount holes need repaired and the previous owner did a few home repairs to the rear control arm mounts. It also appears they installed a new back section of the frame at one time.

      We will grind out all the old welds and re-weld the frame while boxing it in. Should look like new when we are complete.
      Boy that thing is/was rough!
      Convertibles had boxed frames from the factory. Maybe you should try to find one to swap in instead of trying to fix the original frame.
      Dean P.
      '72 Buick Sun Coupe GSX
      My build thread: https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ck)&highlight=

    20. #40
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      545
      Quote Originally Posted by Racerxtx View Post
      Boy that thing is/was rough!
      Convertibles had boxed frames from the factory. Maybe you should try to find one to swap in instead of trying to fix the original frame.
      The areas in the pictures are pretty rough. The good thing is it is only those areas, the rest of the frame is very nice. It won't be too hard for us to fix this and box it in.

      Thanks for looking,
      Ryan
      Ryan
      UMI Performance
      www.umiperformance.com
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 ... LastLast




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com