Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 15 of 15
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Scottsdale AZ
      Posts
      324

      TKX or T56...Looking for input

      Looking for input......

      Installing a 495hp LS3 in a 1968 Camaro with ridetech/Curry setup. Stock subframe.



      I am torn between installing a T56 or a TKX. I am doing this project on the side of my house, and am a little hesitant of cutting out the trans tunnel. I don't plan on going on any long cruises (mostly around town). I do have a welder. Is it very complicated? Just looking for input on the TKX. Am I being a p***y by not going for the T56. I feel like it

      Steve
      Scottsdale AZ


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      2,849
      Country Flag: United States
      TKX all the way in your case.
      Donny

      Support your local hot rod shop!

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Mar 2022
      Posts
      128
      TKX. Smaller and lighter, makes getting engine angle and pinion angle less. You won't miss 6th gear unless your doing alot of highway, high speed touring. I will be putting one in my 575 HP mustang. It's a solid trans. T56 is awesome for big power motors, 700 plus. but if your less than that, the benefits of the TKX are undeniable.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Ventura County CA
      Posts
      556
      Country Flag: United States
      I think a TKX is the right choice for you, but I'll offer my experience with a close ratio Magnum-F since I think there are a couple benefits. My car has 3.73s and 25.6in tall tires.

      First, I often find myself cruising in 5th gear, meaning I am splitting 1:1 4th gear and 0.63:1 6th gear by using the intermediate 0.80:1 5th gear. This is usually on backroads where I'm going maybe 50-60mph and 6th is just a little too much overdrive, but 4th has the engine reving slightly more than I'd like. There is a roadway I drive often near my house where the speed limit is 45 and I find myself chugging along in 5th gear at about 50-55mph. This makes it a sort of Goldilocks in between gear for those scenarios, but we're only talking about a 500-600rpm difference at that speed so it's not a big deal.

      Second, the shifter location on the Magnum-F is much further back the TKX and a bit further back from a standard Magnum. For me, this puts the shifter in a perfect position so I can use a short 6" lever and feel very comfortable/connected with the shift mechanism. I think with the TKX you might have a longer swept-back shift lever, which may feel less direct compared to having the shift mechanism right below your hand on a shorter lever. You really have to measure your car to see where the shifter will be located and make a decision that suits your ergonomic needs. For reference I'm 6'0" tall. I think spending time locating the shifter and even mocking up different lever lengths and offsets well worth the effort to get a car that is comfortable and fun to drive.

      All that said, considering the price difference, the additional work to modify the tunnel (I cut mine out completely and rebuilt it), the additional weight of the Magnum, your power level, and the fact that you just want to cruise around town, I think the TKX is probably the right choice for you.
      Clint - '70 Nova "restomod" cruiser & autocross family car

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Southern California
      Posts
      184
      Country Flag: United States
      TKX all the way for your build. Good luck.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jul 2018
      Posts
      434
      T56 for all the reasons Bandit just explained 1:1 is not enough, the jump to .68 or .63 is too much so the .80 5th is a good place to be

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Just North of NYC
      Posts
      312
      I think the TKX is going to cannibalize a lot of T56 sales. The TKO shifted like a truck, and often required tunnel modifications anyway, and so a case could be made for some to step up to the $$$ T56 plate. But the TKX shifts just like a T56, is much smaller and avoids most tunnel hacking, and is available in 3 different overdrive ratios. I’d get the .81 myself, since my TKO has a .68 and as someone mentioned, it’s too tall and too much of a drop from 1.00 4th.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2020
      Posts
      7
      I have the tkx in 69 camaro (no mods needed) with 450hp. Fabulous all around.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Jacksonville, FL
      Posts
      1,651
      Country Flag: United States
      If you are using the Holley mounts (and all of their other install parts), its a no brainer to use the T56. Holley make a t56 crossmember and the tunnel isn’t required to be raised in that LS swap situation. They (Holley) don’t make a TKX compatible crossmember. I think in situations where using a T56 would require raising the tunnel, the TKX is a great alternative. I have had the stock sub with Holley components with an F body LS Trans and then a magnum. No mods to the tunnel were required. When I switched to a DSE sub, it was “required” to raise the tunnel (and I had no issue with it).

      What gear and tire sizes are you considering? What is your target cruising speed vs RPM? I don’t understand- if you aren’t considering long cruises then why are you even looking at an overdrive trans?
      Chris
      1968 Chevy Camaro SS
      LS3/T56 DSE suspension


    10. #10
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Scottsdale AZ
      Posts
      324
      I am still undecided on T56 or TKX.

      If I go T56, which transmission tunnel is preferred? Speedtech or Bowler?

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Ventura County CA
      Posts
      556
      Country Flag: United States
      Speedtech has an abrupt 90 degree transition at the rear of their tunnel patch while Bowler has more of a tapered transition. Personally I think the longer transition looks better, but will require a little more fitment work. Speedtech has a flange on the sides of theirs which is pre-punched for spot welds, which could make it easier to install.

      After looking at both of them and a few other custom tunnels online, I decided to make my own. I built in a pair of access panels which makes it easy to remove the shifter and access the bellhousing bolts. I've seen a lot of people suffer from leaky shifters, so definitely consider adding an access panel in that area.

      Name:  ly6swap1868.jpg
Views: 1189
Size:  137.6 KB
      Clint - '70 Nova "restomod" cruiser & autocross family car

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jul 2018
      Posts
      434
      I used the Speedtech tunnel, The abrupt end fit perfect with my console. I used a trimmed CV boot for the tunnel hole, just stuffed 2 bellows in to the hole and zip tie the top. Made a little bracket to mount the console to the tunnel.
      20220515_170550 by F G, on Flickr
      20220520_180848 by F G, on Flickr
      20220522_142035 by F G, on Flickr
      20220522_143642 by F G, on Flickr

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Sep 2009
      Posts
      2,707
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by brickyard69 View Post
      I am still undecided on T56 or TKX.

      If I go T56, which transmission tunnel is preferred? Speedtech or Bowler?
      If you install the LS3 using Holley's mounts and oil pan, you DO NOT need to modify your transmission tunnel. I installed both a T56 and a TR6060/T56 Magnum in my 1968 Camaro with ZERO transmission tunnel mods. It is very tight, but it all fit. So IMO, I would say to go with the T56 Magnum if you are going between the two.


      1955 Nomad project LC9, 4L80e, C5 brakes, Vision wheels
      1968 Camaro 6.2 w/ LSA, TR6060-Magnum hybrid and etc SOLD
      1976 T/A LS1 6 Speed, and etc. SOLD
      Follow me on Instagram: ryeguy2006a

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Hamilton, NJ
      Posts
      4,295
      Country Flag: United States
      Does that mean the holley mounts move the engine further forward than other mounts?
      Scott from NJ.

      Vent Windows Forever! ...

      Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold
      I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Scottsdale AZ
      Posts
      324
      Quote Originally Posted by BonzoHansen View Post
      Does that mean the holley mounts move the engine further forward than other mounts?
      I used the Holley mounts but still had to cut some of the tunnel to get the trans high enough so my driveshaft angles were in line.

      I made a small patch/tunnel cover myself.





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com