Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 78
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2019
      Location
      Nashville, TN
      Posts
      64
      Country Flag: United States

      1970 Pontiac Grand Prix, too HEAVY?

      About to dive into a fun project: transforming my 1970 Pontiac Grand Prix into a pro touring machine. Though I’m new to this, I do know that weight (and weight distribution) is a crucial factor in building a car for autocross/road course racing. So the big question is: how heavy is TOO HEAVY?



      The ‘70 Grand Prix is a beast, 118” wheelbase and 4,000+ lbs. I’m concerned that I might be headed down the wrong path with such a heavy machine. It’s a great street cruiser so I don’t plan on “gutting” the car to remove weight. Just wondering if I ought to hold off and try to build a much lighter car. (I don’t have the funds to acquire a ‘69 or ‘70 firebird, but damn that would be fun!) Anyway, is 4,000+ lbs (without driver) just too much??Name:  IMG_5706.JPG
Views: 1789
Size:  634.9 KBName:  IMG_5311.JPG
Views: 1970
Size:  856.9 KBName:  IMG_5252.JPG
Views: 1925
Size:  838.7 KB


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      It’s heavy. But even more so is the aftermarket support for suspension setup is limited. Unless you keep it close to stock.
      I would personally build a A body not a full size.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      419
      Im pretty sure this body style shares suspension with the A-body.

      Weight is only relevant if you want to be competetive. Suspension, tires, and setup will make these pleny of fun but if your chasing lighter or newer cars then weight is a concern. Whats the typical front rear bias? I think these are pretty nose heavy which certainly doesnt help.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2019
      Location
      Nashville, TN
      Posts
      64
      Country Flag: United States
      From what I’ve learned, the suspension is 100% A-body, so luckily parts are everywhere. It’s essentially a ‘stretched A-body’ with 6 extra inches in the middle. Technically referred to as a G-body.

      As for front/rear bias, I can’t seem to find that data anywhere. Nose-heavy might be fairly accurate though.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      oh cool - in that case go for it. I was considering building a Monte Carlo at one point as a street cruiser - same idea, it's a stretched A body and suspension stuff is all compatible. But now I'm thinking if I do build a DD type of classic it will be a earlier A body 64-67 vintage - I just prefer the lines and the size of those. But this would make a great road trip car!!
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jul 2012
      Location
      Iowa
      Posts
      399
      Country Flag: United States
      I say run it and have fun with it. Who cares about being super competitive, you are not racing to make money so just do what you can and drive the crap out of it.
      Miles Boyer
      The car hobby is dangerous,if the speed doesn't kill you, the cost of parts will.
      91 V8 S10
      88 Cutlass Pro-Tour
      97 Chevy lifted Z-71
      96 Corvette

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,548
      Country Flag: United States
      Weight and distribution is very important. But if that's all that mattered this would be a Miata forum.

      That thing is cool! Build it, be the only one at the track with one, and enjoy surprising the <censored> out of everyone.

      Yes, A-body suspensions will swap on, and there's a ton of aftermarket support for that.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2019
      Location
      Nashville, TN
      Posts
      64
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for the feedback, guys. I’ve actually had many a road trip in this beast. It was my restored-daily-driver in the late 90’s and it hasn’t seen a lot of love in the past decade or so. Can’t part with it, so might as well pro-tour it!

      Anybody else dealt with large, front-heavy cars? I don’t know how to pull weight out of it without going full-on racecar. I’m looking at ridetech coilovers, improved caster spindles, Wilwood on all 4 corners, and a 3.55 or so posi. Guess I won’t be road tripping without an overdrive mod to the TH400...

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,548
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by TanMan View Post
      Thanks for the feedback, guys. I’ve actually had many a road trip in this beast. It was my restored-daily-driver in the late 90’s and it hasn’t seen a lot of love in the past decade or so. Can’t part with it, so might as well pro-tour it!

      Anybody else dealt with large, front-heavy cars? I don’t know how to pull weight out of it without going full-on racecar. I’m looking at ridetech coilovers, improved caster spindles, Wilwood on all 4 corners, and a 3.55 or so posi. Guess I won’t be road tripping without an overdrive mod to the TH400...
      As far as moving more bias to the rear:
      Aluminum radiator and electric fans.
      Move the battery to the trunk.
      Aluminum heads, intake, block, etc.
      Tubular a-arms can weigh less than the factory stamped steel sometimes.
      If it's the same radiator core as an A-body, there are companies that sell aluminum ones (but expect to pay bucks).
      An "LS" engine, even if iron block, is significantly lighter than a Pontiac.
      Hollow front sway bar (probably wouldn't weigh less than the solid stock, but would be much stiffer without adding significant weight).
      Rack and pinon conversion (not simple or cheap though).
      Headers instead of cast iron logs.
      Lighter (and better bolstered) front buckets.
      Manual trans. in most cases will be lighter than automatics with torque converters and fluids, plus won't require a trans cooler.
      Manual brakes or hydraboost.
      Front discs (rear discs I think would still be similar to drums because of the parking brake mechanism).

      Neutral (not shifting significantly fore/aft):
      Any structural bolts you remove, you could replace with titanium. Non-load bearing screws (like interior) could be replaced with aluminum.
      Aluminum or carbon fiber driveshaft.
      Aluminum wheels.

      Less overall weight but removed from rear:
      Sheet-metal fabricated 9" rear with aluminum center section.
      Hollow rear sway bar (also more of a weight avoidance like the front).
      Smaller gas tank or plastic-based tank.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,548
      Country Flag: United States
      Almost forgot. I recently removed about 30lbs from the front of mine using a combination of intermittent fasting, limiting average daily calories to 1800-2000 calories, daily walks, occasionally biking or swimming, and resistance training 3x per week using a 5x5 program.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2019
      Location
      Nashville, TN
      Posts
      64
      Country Flag: United States
      Wow, quite the comprehensive list! Great stuff.

      What I read was, “money, $$, more money, $$$, and BIG money”. So yeah, I read ya loud and clear. Shouldn’t deceive myself and pretend this will be affordable.

      I do love that with all of these mods and creative weight reduction, these are still fully functional, street-drivable cars. Head’s in the right place, wallet’s not.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Aug 2019
      Location
      Nashville, TN
      Posts
      64
      Country Flag: United States
      And it’s funny, the 30 pound reduction in the driver’s seat doesn’t cost a penny..

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Feb 2019
      Location
      Kankakee IL
      Posts
      362
      Don't be a cookie cutter! That car is awesome.

      And more weight can always be overcome with more HP. It's the power to weight ratio that is what you feel.
      Tracey

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Apr 2014
      Location
      DFW, TX
      Posts
      119
      Country Flag: United States
      Just run it and have a lot of fun. It will take a while to learn the car and then to learn how to drive fast and then you can decide on what is the best direction for getting faster from that point! I love seeing different cars at events! Even the F bodies are getting to be cookie cutter cars out there- Dare to be different!
      1978 Pontiac Trans Am Y88-R,
      UMI Performace, LS3/T56 Holley EFI

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Sep 2014
      Location
      Huron South Dakota
      Posts
      70
      Country Flag: United States
      That is an A body not a full size. Do some research.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      May 2018
      Posts
      98
      I don't know actual numbers, but had a 69 Grand Prix and I can tell you that you could stand between the engine and the radiator if the fan shroud was removed. The engine is further back than the hood line would suggest. It's still heavy, and has a lot of overhang front and rear but don't let any of that dissuade you. I think it would be a cool car.

      Name:  003-mancini-1969-pontiac-grand-prix-sj-engine-overall.jpg
Views: 1368
Size:  246.0 KB
      Jim..Car Junkie
      1969 Vette--Big pistons, No turbo....yet
      RX7 Turbo II--No pistons. Big turbo--now in my Daughter's garage
      68 RS Z/28, '12 Boss 302, 86 911, several RX7's, 3rd gen f-bodies, fox body, and many more..(gone)

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      1,078
      Country Flag: United States
      Jeff Schwartz did it in a 1982 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham nearly 20 years ago... you can too!

      https://www.schwartzperformance.com/...wood-brougham/

      "Cadillac Attack"

      Measured Performance
      •1.02 Lateral G’s on skidpad
      •11.80 @ 118 mph in ¼ mile
      •0–60 4.0 sec
      •Top Speed: 150 mph

      Frame & Suspension
      •Schwartz narrowed and boxed stock chassis
      •12" single piston GM brakes, front and rear

      Engine
      •Schwartz 700hp 500 cid Cadillac Eldorado engine (eg. big heavy cast iron V8)
      •Holley 850 cfm
      •Custom headers
      •NOS Big Shot 225hp
      •Ported heads
      •custom grind hydraulic camshaft

      Drivetrain
      •TH400
      •Custom driveshaft
      •GM 8.5 ten bolt

      Exhaust
      •Custom 3” dual-exhaust system with Flowmaster mufflers

      Wheels & Tires
      •Centerline Forged Billet wheels; fully polished
      •17x11 with 315/35/17 Nitto Drag Radials
      •17x9 with 275/40/17 Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 tires
      SMSgt Ty Ingle, USAF
      "CF71" - Freedom Bird
      Hoodpins.com, Inland Empire Driveline, Billet Accessories Direct, Modo Innovations, AutoRad Radiators, Morris Classic Concepts, Marquez Design, Anvil Auto, Fesler Billet, US Collision (DOOM), AGR Performance, Pro-touringF-body.com, Phoenix Transmission Products, Shiftworks, ACC Carpet, Hedman Hedders, BMR Fabrication, American Autowire, MityMounts, TIN INDIAN Performance, Kauffman Racing Equipment, Pypes, RobbMc Performance, WMC, Holley, NOS, PST

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Mar 2014
      Location
      Yuma, AZ
      Posts
      635
      Country Flag: United States
      I agree, don't be a cookie cutter! Build it how you want, and have fun with it. That is the most important part. Plus, your car will be unique in stead of blending into the sea of Camaros.

      That big car done up with the right stance and wheels will look pretty cool!
      Nelson
      1969 Chevelle "Cone Smasher" Family Project
      https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...uot?highlight=

      1984 "Rustang" GT, 5.0, 5 Speed Project
      https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...T-(Slow-Build)

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,548
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by jimco84x View Post
      I don't know actual numbers, but had a 69 Grand Prix and I can tell you that you could stand between the engine and the radiator if the fan shroud was removed. The engine is further back than the hood line would suggest. It's still heavy, and has a lot of overhang front and rear but don't let any of that dissuade you. I think it would be a cool car.

      Name:  003-mancini-1969-pontiac-grand-prix-sj-engine-overall.jpg
Views: 1368
Size:  246.0 KB
      It appears the extra 5" of wheelbase is moving the front axle forward of the engine compared to the A-body. If that's the case, then the weight distribution may not be as bad as the OP thinks. Be interesting to get it on some scales and compare to a GTO.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Oh if that's a car you already own - by all means build it. Hell yes!!

      I would add aftermarket AC to it as well!
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com