Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 11 of 11
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2017
      Posts
      100

      Suspension Setup to Lower Car

      I have a 68 Chevelle. I've purchased QA1 level 3 handling kit front Andy rear. I also have 2" drop spindles up front. My goal is lower the car to the level shown in the attached photo. The rear Springs are 14" in length and the fronts are (according to the website) are 12.88" uncompressed. I'm sure the spring lengths are designed for stock ride height. I know someone out there knows exactly what front/rear spring lengths I need. At the moment the spring seat is only 1/2" from the bottom of threaded shock body so I can't lower it any further.

      thanks in advance for your help.

      Perry

      Attached Images Attached Images  


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,495
      Country Flag: United States
      You can’t really compare/specify unloaded spring lengths without knowing the spring rates in pounds per inch.

      Sorry if I misunderstood your post.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2017
      Posts
      100
      Whoops, my bad. Completely forgot that info. The front coilovers are rated for 450 lbs/in and the rears at rated for 175 lbs/in. If I'm not mistaken the QA1 system puts the ride height in the stock position more or less. I would Locke to lower the car as shown in the photo I attached. My apologies if I failed to ask the question correctly.

      Thanks again,
      Perry

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,495
      Country Flag: United States
      Keep in mind that your Coilover shock needs to be roughly centered in its travel at ride height. If you already have springs install them and see where you sit. Then you can adjust the spring rate as needed.

      It is a common misconception that coilovers offer a lot of ride height adjustability but that is really not the case because the shock needs to be able to compress or ride quality will suck due to the shock bottoming out.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Oct 2011
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      528
      Country Flag: United States
      Perry. Is that your car in the pic?

      Do you have the QA1 kit installed yet?

      Do you know the P/N of the QA1 kit you purchased?

      Do you have a current side view pic of your car?
      Technical Support
      UMI Performance, Inc.
      [email protected]
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2017
      Posts
      100
      No that's not my car. It's the stance I'm after in mine.

      Yes the QA1 system is installed.

      HK03-GMA2
      https://www.qa1.net/suspension/handl...uspension-kits

      I don't have a side shot yet. I don't have wheels yet. But what I've been doing is using a tool called Percy's wheelrite to determine backspacing it does show my overall wheel diameter. Body, doors, front clip and trunk lid are installed no interior yet. So I think my car is loaded pretty well. I have the body sitting on wood blocks being support at the bottom shock mounts both front and rear.

      Thanks for the help
      Perry
      Attached Images Attached Images    

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2017
      Posts
      100
      I forgot to mention that the wheelrite tool is set for a 19x9 wheel. My goal is 18x9 up front and 20x10 in the rear. You can see the clearance I have between the wheel lip and the small black wire which emulates the tire.

      Perry

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,495
      Country Flag: United States
      Finish the car and then worry about ride height. It will drop quite a bit more when it is completed.

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      Michigan
      Posts
      322
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
      Finish the car and then worry about ride height. It will drop quite a bit more when it is completed.

      Don
      Exactly; looks like you're supporting the weight of the front of the car from the spring pockets of the A-arm. The front end will drop substantially when it's actually supported by the wheels due to using the real motion ratio of the front suspension. Think of how much more leverage the weight of the car will have on the spring; it'll be close to double.
      - Ryan

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2011
      Location
      Philipsburg, Pa
      Posts
      528
      Country Flag: United States
      I checked out the kit and you're off to a good start I think.

      And as mentioned above, final ride height is set when the car is ready to drive. The rear c/o should certainly accommodate. If the front doesn't go low enough you may need to check into a drop spindle.

      ramey
      Technical Support
      UMI Performance, Inc.
      [email protected]
      814.343.6315

      Join us on Facebook!

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Sep 2017
      Posts
      100
      Ah yes, makes sense. And I do have drop spindles. Thanks for all the help!!

      Perry





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com