Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
    Results 41 to 60 of 72
    1. #41
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Quote Originally Posted by c4racer2 View Post
      It’s KRC. A few others make a bracket tho.
      https://www.krcpower.com/

      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4


    2. #42
      Join Date
      Jun 2012
      Location
      South Lyon, MI
      Posts
      1,217
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by c4racer2 View Post
      Thanks

    3. #43
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      The pads on these ST brakes have very low bite until they are bedded in - so that's next on the agenda.
      But got it out for a longer shake down cruise this morning. All is working good - except the clutch is slipping a bit when driving in gear with small throttle stabs. So I need to take a look at whats doing with the TO bearing. It feels good with 1/2" or so of play before the clutch starts to push in - but haven't inspected it yet.

      Centerforce DF clutch. I understand they need some break in time, but this seems like excessive slipping to me - could be a bad disc, or could be the TO bearing is too close to the clutch.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    4. #44
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Found the smoking gun. The pin that keeps the Tilton TO bearing assembly from spinning is too long and it hits a weight on the clutch, which prevents it from engaging fully.
      Not sure I can fix this without a trans R&R, but at least I know what is causing it and it's an easy fix.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    5. #45
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Trans has to come out for sure.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    6. #46
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      2,848
      Country Flag: United States
      How is that not making a hellacious sound?
      Donny

      Support your local hot rod shop!

    7. #47
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523

      Old Soul 71 Camaro build

      Oh I don’t think those weights really spin. They are on the pressure plate with a ring. Reason I don’t think they spin is this hasn’t broken loose yet with half a dozen drive cycles.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    8. #48
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      2,848
      Country Flag: United States
      Is your pressure plate bolted to the flywheel? If you answered yes, those weights are spinning with the pressure plate.
      Donny

      Support your local hot rod shop!

    9. #49
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Ya that makes sense. Don’t know but it’s not making noise the pin looks intact and it’s touching a weight - very hard to see in there with a mirror and flashlight
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    10. #50
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Pulled the trans this afternoon. I think that pin was hitting and not letting those spin. Or maybe it was just damn close to hitting. No evidence of damage on the pin. But took more careful measurements and I was off about 3/16”. So I had no clearance and pushing the fingers at least 1/8” at rest. Literally went in 2 or 3 full turns with the bearing assembly. I have more confidence that I now have 1/8” Clearance. Plus I can now use the shorter pin so it’s out of the way of the fingers for sure. It’s almost 1/2” shorter. So feeling pretty good about this.

      Time to button her back up and re-test.
      Should be driving it over the weekend.



      Get Outlook for iOS
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    11. #51
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Second time did the trick. Clutch now doesn’t slip. Woo hoo. Although I almost ran the car out of fuel on the short test drive. Need to get a bucket of fuel in her before doing more testing. But all seems good now.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    12. #52
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Ma.
      Posts
      5,567
      Country Flag: United States
      Glad to hear it’s all set now, good luck with the test drive.
      Wayne
      Car FINALLY home !!!!!! lol
      Project FNQUIK https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=FNQUIK

    13. #53
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Got it out long enough to verify it
      Works properly and no longer slips. So happy about that !
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    14. #54
      Join Date
      Sep 2013
      Location
      Oakley, CA
      Posts
      107
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by c4racer2 View Post
      Next project while the motor is out is brakes. Since I needed a solution for a clutch master and wanted to run a dual master manual brake set-up, I landed on this nifty little bracket from NoLimit engineering. And I've been working with Ron Sutton on a StopTech based system that will be available for stock second gen spindles. Along with that needed 18" wheels so picked up a set of the Rocket Racing Attack in 18x10 and installed Nitto NT04 tires in 275/35 and 295/35 size.
      6" backspace. Same size wheels front and rear. Looks like will run a .25" spacer in back and fronts should be OK as-is.

      Attachment 162033

      Attachment 162034

      Attachment 162038

      Attachment 162035

      Attachment 162036

      Attachment 162037

      Attachment 162039
      The wheels and tires fit with stock subframe and no massaging of rear lips?
      ------------------------------
      69 Camaro LS3/6L80e
      70 Camaro RS LS3/6l80e
      74 Nova 434 SBC

    15. #55
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523

      Old Soul 71 Camaro build

      Yes. But the rear is a 4th gen so it’s .5” wider than stock. So equivalent to 5.75” bs on a stock rear. Oh and shocks relocated inboard of springs as well. But stock tub no issue with the seatbelt hump at all and fenders are not rolled at all. I did not end up needing a spacer btw.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    16. #56
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523

      Old Soul 71 Camaro build

      Got a longer shake down cruise in the car with more gas in the tank. All seems good on the trans and clutch front. Good feel, shifts nicely, confirmed no slippage. Looks like I will need to adjust the carb tuning a bit for a manual trans - the loose converter before covers up a lot - now the engine may actually see wot as low as 2000-2500 rpm where before it always flashed to 3K. Got it up into 5th even. Love the lower 5th gear vs the Fbody version. Has a .80 5th which is pretty usable. Not sure how much it will ever need 6th at least not with 3.42s. Seems like a 3.70 or 3.89 gear will be the way to go.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    17. #57
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Went out early this AM and did the brake bedding. Had a bit of a scare with a CHP cruiser sitting on my remote testing road - but was only doing maybe 50 in a 45 so he didn't blink - despite the fact there was a late model Mustang right next to me. I was worried he might think we were racing - we weren't at all. I was just about to do my #9 out of 10 stops when I saw him. So I bailed on that and went out on the freeway and cooled them off for 10min, then came back further down that same road to get the second 10 stop cycle in.

      Anyway - still don't get enough clamping force on the front brakes. Can't quite lock them up. Since I'm out of adjustment on the balance bar and using same size masters on both, I think my next course of action is swapping the 1/4" rear line for 3/16" to match the front line. Seems like that will help because it's less fluid to push, so will effectively bias back to the front. I think the rear master is still bottoming out before the fronts reach full clamping. Anyway - I'd like to get the pushrods about even at full braking.
      But at least the car is safe to drive on the street. Got some highway runs in as I was cooling the brakes and it's pretty nice having a 5th and 6th gear. Got into 6th - runs about 2100rpm at 75 or so. Not dead smooth there as you can feel the carb still toying with the idle circuit, but by 2300 its pretty good. Actually just cruising this motor at 2500 on the highway is pretty good - it's very happy there, isn't too loud, runs right at the thermostat 160deg. Oil got up to 200 - that's without a cooler.
      Overall got a good 90 minutes of driving in including some stop and go. Got gas, calibrated the elec speedo twice - seems pretty accurate now using my bike GPS as the reference.
      Once warmed up the carb actually works pretty decently with this set-up. Takes a bit more clutch slip than a stock LS / LT1 car - but not bad. More gear would be helpful overall. I'd say definitely either a 3.70 or a 3.89
      Pretty nice to drive with a good manual I must say. Fits the motor nicely, adding a bit more gear is a minor tweak to get it perfect. It's pretty good even with the 3.42s.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    18. #58
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      Name:  IMG_6078.JPG
Views: 463
Size:  557.6 KB
      Name:  IMG_6080.JPG
Views: 467
Size:  598.2 KB
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    19. #59
      Join Date
      Oct 2018
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      523
      After consulting with Ron these were designed to work as a front / rear pair and won’t work well with stock or other brand mix. So I need to get that 9” going so I can install the entire brake package and do it right. Plus I would like a little more gear and a parking brake would make the car a lot more useable.

      I’m happy the car works very well together otherwise - so upgrading to a stronger rear which it needs with 500+ ft lbs and a manual - along with the complete 4 corner brake package will really make the car pretty complete.

      For now. Heh.
      1971 Camaro - 406 / T56
      2016 Camaro SS convertible
      2018 Colorado 4x4

    20. #60
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Wisconsin
      Posts
      208
      Country Flag: United States
      The car looks great!
      Used to be known as classiccamaro

    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com