Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 4 of 4
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Feb 2013
      Location
      El Dorado Hills, CA
      Posts
      116
      Country Flag: United States

      Question: Stock verses Quicktime bellhousing (fact or opinion)

      Does anyone out there know or at least have an educated opinion regarding when a stock LS aluminum bellhousing should be replaced with a Quicktime or similar bellhousing? I'm running a mildly updated (about 550 HP), LS3 with no plans for racing it, just street performance. Can I feel safe in using the stock bellhousing? I have a Mcleod RST clutch and a T56 transmission. I appreciate any feedback on this.

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      2,849
      Country Flag: United States
      Cars are dangerous. Modified cars are dangerouser....er.

      Only you can determine the level of risk you are willing to accept.

      I like and use the stock bellhousing.
      Donny

      Support your local hot rod shop!

    3. #3
      Join Date
      May 2010
      Location
      kitchener,Ontario,Canada
      Posts
      2,336
      Country Flag: Canada
      I'd guess you're probably safe with the stock one at that level... but, you can never be too safe
      Spinnin'my tires in life's fast lane

      Ryan Austin
      On twitter @raustinss
      On Instagram austinss70

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Arizona
      Posts
      239
      Hmmmmmm, how many ZL1's, CTS-V's and Z28's, and the like were produced and sold to the public with stock bell housings.... 650 HP stuff with stock bell housings, sold to the folks who are willing to hire Dewy Cheatum and How, every time they spill a cup of coffee. I don't think any OEM would take on that liability. I would say your stock bell will be just fine if your rear tires last more than three months. IMHO.







    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com