Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 34
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States

      Brake plumbing: 3/16 or 1/4 hard line?

      I think this is an easy question. I'm gonna be plumbing my brakes soon, and I'm wondering what diameter hard line to get. I thought the answer was an easy 3/16", but I've noticed plumbing retailers offering fittings and line in 1/4".

      Anybody know 'bout this?



      Oh, if it matters: Wilwood dual masters (3/4, 3/4) on a balance bar, Wilwood 6 piston, 14" rotor up front, and Wilwood 4 piston, 12" rotor in back.

      thanks!
      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro


    2. #2
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      Hi John.... 1/4 from master to distribution block. 3/16" distribution to front brakes. 1/4" distribution to rear tee, then 3/16" from tee to calipers....I have know idea what brake system you are using due to goverment type secrecy but that would be a guide line.
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      John, just had this very conversation with Willwood Friday. They said 3/16 all over with keep pressure up. Said their calipers do not need much volume. I thought it would be exactly oppisite

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Dec 2002
      Location
      Lost Wages, Nevada
      Posts
      2,684
      Country Flag: United States
      It depends on caliper volume really.

      For what most of us know, 3/16 front and 1/4 rear has been the norm. But, most of what were talking about is on 30+ year old chassis. The 1/4 was because of a volume issue with drum brakes. All of the newer 4x disc systems are 3/16 standard, front and rear.

      If you were to run the newer master like on the C5/6, 3/16 will do just fine, as it is set up for the volumes typically used in newer ABS systems that deal with known caliper volumes.

      This is the master I am refering to:


      If you are using something other than that, knowing the caliper volumes will be a big help on figuring out what is really necessary. Another couple of things I remember:
      · It is recommended that rigid lines with an ID of 3/16" be used throughout the chassis because of their resistance to flex.
      · AN-3 stainless steel braid Teflon should be used from the chassis out to the calipers and rear axle.
      · Flex lines in AN-2 will restrict fluid flow and lines in AN-4 will increase displacement with the possibility of a spongy pedal feel. AN-4 is good for the clutch line.
      ·Route all lines down hill from the master cylinders and avoid loops that go up in the SS braided lines.

      Here is an interesting read on a related subject:
      Stop Tech

      And these are somethings to consider aas well:
      Stewart Development

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      You guys rock!

      I'm using two standard Wilwood masters in 3/4" diameter. Sounds like 3/16 and AN3 all around, though the 6 piston SuperLites might consume a bit more volume. That would be counter-balanced by having a dedicated master for it though. I'll check out the links as well.

      thanks!
      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Salt lake city
      Posts
      9
      I always thought you used 1/4" going to the rear lines because you are using 1 line to supply fluid to 2 brakes, and then tee it off to 3/16 on the rear end??

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      Thats what i've always thought too, but I think John is running 4 masters..lol ...hows the weather in Salt Lake? Anywhere near Greenvalley?
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      I always thought you used 1/4" going to the rear lines because you are using 1 line to supply fluid to 2 brakes
      Actually, I'm doing that for both the front and back. I was gonna do it like this (hey, that's a great song lyric) for both front and back brakes: master to t-junction and then each leg goes to a brake.

      Other than length of the line from the master cylinder to the t-junction (which doesn't matter since the fluid is not compressible), the only difference is the placement of the flex line. There are two flex lines in the front from the frame to the caliper, and one on the back feeding the t-junction on the top of the rear housing.

      I'm thinking Tom (chicane67) is right: the 1/4" supply line is needed for drum brakes. So 3/16 all around sounds right to me, which Wilwood confirmed to Frank.

      Good discussion!

      but I think John is running 4 masters
      Vince, you kill me! Nah, just two: one for da front, one for da back.

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      OKC, OK
      Posts
      3,739
      Country Flag: United States
      I agree with the posts above, 3/16 front, and 1/4 for the rear to the tee. Pressure is pressure though, the only thing you might notice if you ran 1/4 instead of 3/16 is a longer pedal travel to reach your required operating pressure. I don't think it would be as much of an issue with power brakes, but it might be more noticeable with manual. Isn't many of Wilwoods systems designed to run manual setups? If so that may be the reason they are recommending 3/16 all the way around. Would it also stand to reason that by running a larger rear brake line you would be slightly delaying maximum brake pressure thus creating a bias to the front? If you running an adjustable bias valve this would negate line sizes. Same theory applies to master cylinders. Oh the decisions.


      Mike
      Mike Redpath
      Musclerodz & Customz
      405-288-0189
      pro-touring parts specialists
      Musclerodz.com

      facebook page
      http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Mus...73054649402015
      instagram
      Musclerodz

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm using a balance bar between the masters which will allow me to adjust for front/rear bias. I would say not to use line size as an adjustment parameter, but use what will provide the best performance for each individual brake and then adjust bias with a bias valve or balance bar. It ain't easy swapping brake hard line!

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      England
      Posts
      1,042
      I would go with what willwood recomend as they have designed the system+ plus with the 1/4 pipe you will need a larger volume master cylinder for the rear brakes , any maths people here to see what the extra volume of oil would be needed to move the rear calipers if using 1/4" instead of 3/16 pipe .
      paul67. just a thought

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      OKC, OK
      Posts
      3,739
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by parsonsj
      I'm using a balance bar between the masters which will allow me to adjust for front/rear bias. I would say not to use line size as an adjustment parameter, but use what will provide the best performance for each individual brake and then adjust bias with a bias valve or balance bar. It ain't easy swapping brake hard line!

      jp
      I would never try and use line size as a bias mechanism, but it does work in theory. Bias bar or proportioning valve is the only way to go. We really need an engineer to build these cars with all the complicated mathmatical computations! Man that is alot of big words.

      Mike
      Mike Redpath
      Musclerodz & Customz
      405-288-0189
      pro-touring parts specialists
      Musclerodz.com

      facebook page
      http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Mus...73054649402015
      instagram
      Musclerodz

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      Dallas Texas
      Posts
      496
      Country Flag: United States

      brake lines

      just want to chime in here, the size of the line wont affect pressure - it is equal over the entire system the bigger line to rear adds more volume .pressure wont be affected by this

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      61
      A completely rigid hard line's diameter will not effect pressure in a sealed hydraulic system AT ALL (see Pascal's law), even if you were to use 4" sewer pipe.

      Flex line can effect pedal travel because it tries to straighten out as pressure is applied. The less flex, the less pedal travel. Larger diameter hose will flex more than smaller. Longer hose will flex more than shorter, and rubber encased hose will flex more than SSbraided.

      The small amount of fluid flow in a brake system is negligable when considering the difference between 1/4 and 3/16 line, especially considering it is then restricted back to 3/16 or less by the line's seat anyway.
      There were and are plenty of cars using 3/16 hard line throughout the system to large volume wheel cylinders and calipers.
      GM changed to 1/4 line to the rear axle when they added the tandem master in 1967. Why they did this is anyone's guess, but it is probably for fluid weight, since many of the cars after that used no residual valve at all to the drums.

      Dont confuse a closed hydraulic system with an open one, such as once used in rock quarries. They have somewhat opposite properties.

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      NY
      Posts
      1,070
      Also be careful with the type of line you purchase. I use 2 different suppliers and one bends a lot easier than the other. Problem is it is also more eaisly damaged if hit by something. If you haven't routed your lines yet try some clamps by Kugel, low cost and neat appearance.
      Also I think Inline Tube will bend anything on their machines if you supply a template. They can even cover with the armor. Good luck

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      Damn. From Inline Tube:
      Please remember we can only duplicate lines for factory original cars with factory original parts. Inline Tube does NOT make lines for modified cars with aftermarket parts retrofitted to the factory cars.
      Good thought though.

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      OKC, OK
      Posts
      3,739
      Country Flag: United States
      Yes Inline tube SUCKS! They won't modify stock lines, or build custom ones either. not to mention the salesman I talked to late last week was unpleasant to talk too.

      The good news. I called Classic Tube and got a much better response along with talking to someone who wanted to help me. And they can do custom work!

      Mike
      Mike Redpath
      Musclerodz & Customz
      405-288-0189
      pro-touring parts specialists
      Musclerodz.com

      facebook page
      http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Mus...73054649402015
      instagram
      Musclerodz

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      Classic tube, eh? I'll check 'em out.

      Here's another question: it seems to me that doing the whole system in AN is far easier than 45 degree and the double flaired ends that go with it.

      Thoughts?

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      OKC, OK
      Posts
      3,739
      Country Flag: United States
      AN no problem for them. Background: Call them last week about stainless fuel and brake lines for the Blazer. Told them what I was doing. Stock brake likes except at the booster since I am planning a Hydroboost setup, and stainless flex brake lines which they have DOT as well. Brakes done. Next I asked about modifying the stock fuel line setup since I am putting my LT-1 in it and need an intake pump which is at a different pickup location. No problem. They would swedge an AN end where I wanted and attach a stainless flex line to the pump. They would also install an inline frame rail fuel filter as well. I was very happy with my phone call to them. Price wasn't anymore expensive than buying finished lines.

      Mike
      Mike Redpath
      Musclerodz & Customz
      405-288-0189
      pro-touring parts specialists
      Musclerodz.com

      facebook page
      http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Mus...73054649402015
      instagram
      Musclerodz

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      133
      Quote Originally Posted by MuscleRodz
      Yes Inline tube SUCKS! They won't modify stock lines, or build custom ones either. not to mention the salesman I talked to late last week was unpleasant to talk too.

      The good news. I called Classic Tube and got a much better response along with talking to someone who wanted to help me. And they can do custom work!

      Mike
      Was it Colin or Mark? I spoke to both of them and they both seemed rather condescending and acted like you don't know what your talking about when asking questions. (What ever happened to good customer service?) I asked them some questions regarding a couple of their products to clarify it's would work for my application. they said yes and of course it was screwed up when I got it. I liked the "master cylinders fitting sizes are all the same" answer I got when I asked them about their MC to distribution conversion line set which I bought. Of course I had to spend 2 hours flipping the lines around to make it right for my MC.
      1965 GTO - 439ci Pontiac ,66 Tripower induction, M-20, Full GW suspension, 3:1 PS, manual Baer 13"/12" disks, 18" AR TT2 "Classics"
      2005 GTO - chrome lugs and valve caps...

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com