TLWiltman
07-28-2005, 05:35 AM
So...
I have a cambered rear end housing with .5* neg. camber. I also have the available 360* mount that slips over the mount, and is to be welded to the snout (spindle). I figure I have some options here
1-have the bracket mounted at a .5* angle relative to the axle tube
2-mount the bracket straight, then use ~.030" (tangent of .5* across 3.5") extra shim on the bottom side of the radial mount bracket. I'm a little leary of the extra bending stress on the bolts (what little there would be)
3-mount the bracket straight, put the radial mount on flat, and "let things take care of themselves"(pad wear and bracket flex)
My question is... which one of these would be best? or, am I missing something?
I have a cambered rear end housing with .5* neg. camber. I also have the available 360* mount that slips over the mount, and is to be welded to the snout (spindle). I figure I have some options here
1-have the bracket mounted at a .5* angle relative to the axle tube
2-mount the bracket straight, then use ~.030" (tangent of .5* across 3.5") extra shim on the bottom side of the radial mount bracket. I'm a little leary of the extra bending stress on the bolts (what little there would be)
3-mount the bracket straight, put the radial mount on flat, and "let things take care of themselves"(pad wear and bracket flex)
My question is... which one of these would be best? or, am I missing something?