Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
03-16-2011 #1
Year One Honeycomb 17" x 9" Honeycombs on 71 GTO
Year one just came out with a reproduction 17" x 9" Honeycomb Wheel with a 5" backspacing. Only size they offer! I really like a little more sidewall so I was thinking 255/50/17 on all four corners. Would a 255/50/17 fit all around without any mods, and would they be safe on a 9" wheel? I have upper Hotckis A-arms with B-body spindles and 12" ILE brake set up.
Thanks
-
03-17-2011 #2I think they will work fine. I havent had them on such a vehicle, but I have 17x8.5 and 17x9.5 on a 69 cutlass and they fit fine. Not sure of the BS but it has a good 2.5" lip on the outside. The 8.5" in front now has Falken 245/45 on it, and I agree the sidewall looks a bit skinny. Before the falkens, there was a set of 255/45 Good years on there (those tires have a nice wide tread width).
03-19-2011 #3Spoke with a Technician at Driverz Inc. and he felt that a 17"x9" with 5" backspacing with B Body spindles could pose a rubbing problem. I did further research and was wondering if anyone had thought about 245/45/17 up front which has a section width of 9.6" and has a height of 25.7" Out back I'll put 255/45/17 with a section width of 10" and height 26.1. Both tires state they can be mounted on 9" rim. That being said can anyone advise. Thanks
03-20-2011 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 1
I run 245/45/17 Front with a 255/50/17 rear with no problems on my 70 Chevelle, the car is lowred 2". I did just get my new wheels, F18x9.5 and R18x11. I will be running a 265/3518F with a 315/35/18R, it will require me to do alittle work on the rear wheel lip.
03-21-2011 #5



Reply With Quote