Results 1 to 20 of 23
-
05-09-2005 #1
New to Pro-Touring
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 13
1969 Camaro - Blank Slate - Wanna Help?
Evening Gents,
First off I really like the site here, I just spent a few hours reading back through all the suspension pages and my brain is fit to bust now. Truth be told I am somewhat confused though, I guess I am too new at this to understand some of the acronyms being used and the same question tends to get different answers. I know, everyone has a difference of opinion which causes that disconnect so I figured I'd ask my own questions and get my own answers.
So here goes. I just bought a 1969 Camaro, which has been my dream car since I was 9 - I'm 31 now. The body is decent, no powertrain at all, I suspect it was originally a 6cyl or small V8 car and someone switched the trim tag, the rear axle is a 10 bolt, it is mono-leaf, and I am about to rip it apart and start learning how to put it back together. I have a fairly nice 427 sitting in the corner which will probably be backed by a T56 but that is WAY dow the road for now. Seeing as I am about to take it down to the frame I would like to bring it back up a bit nicer than original. I like the idea of pro-touring but I will never road race this thing. I want a streetable, well-handling, quick, good looking car. If I'm on a back country road and take a curve with a little speed I don't want it running away from me. I have estimated 3-4 years for the restoration to where I want it but suspension is first on the list. OK, that being said I would also say I am not a Rockerfeller or a Trump. Budget does come into play during this build BUT I will save up in order to get the performance I am looking for. I really want to do it right the first time.
Well that is my story. Any recommendations on front and rear suspension? Also, and this is probably the wrong forum for this, do I keep the 10 bolt or start looking for something that will stand up to the 427 a bit better?
Thanks guys,
Ron
-
05-09-2005 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Maine
- Posts
- 594
Hi Ron,
I'm in somewhat of the same boat as you are, except that my current project is a Datsun 240Z.
I've been researching different suspension designs trying to determine what to do with this little car. I'm starting with a blank slate, and hope to design the best system I can and then build it all myself.
I suppose the first question is... how exotic do you want to get? The stock style suspension can be made to handle pretty well. Stiffer springs, better shocks, subframe connectors, sway bar, etc... will make a world of difference over the factory handling.
Keeping the stock style suspension and upgrading it is probably the least expensive option unless you plan on designing and building your own suspension from scratch (assuming you already have the tools).
Another option is to replace the stock style suspension with an aftermarket kit suspension. There are several companies that make complete front subframes for first gen Camaros... for example, www.waynedue.com sells one such frame that utilizes Corvette pieces and coil over springs. As for the rear, there are also a few kits which can change your leaf spring suspension to truck arms, or a four link of some sort. Also, you may have noticed the thread in this forum about a new 3 link kit in the works. This option will allow big improvements, but will cost a bit.
The final option is to design your own suspension. Basically, make your own version of one of the kits above... This can be done fairly inexpensively, but it requires a lot more planning and work to do. For my project, I'm planning on an unequal length A-arm front suspension with coil over shocks. For my rear suspension, the 3 link looks tempting and is very popular for a fun corner-turner. I'm debating between that and a Satchell link, which is a type of 4 link.
Keep asking questions and you'll figure out what you want to do and what will fit your budget. Good luck!
John

05-09-2005 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- savannah,ga
- Posts
- 862



Reply With Quote