PDA

View Full Version : AWD Wagon Suggestions?



Tony_SS
05-15-2010, 06:29 PM
After taking a short trip in my Suburban, I'm thinking about replacing it with something more enjoyable to drive w/o losing cargo space and winter weather mobility. I figured an AWD or full time 4WD wagon would be nice.. I still can haul the family, cargo and get better mpgs.

Any recommendations? I'll consider any make or model.

Vicinity
05-15-2010, 06:30 PM
From what I understand, Subaru's are pretty good in that department. I've never driven one, though.

724tim
05-15-2010, 06:56 PM
X 2 on the Subaru also try Mazda 3

93Polo
05-15-2010, 07:28 PM
A Corvette friend traded his AutoX weapon Suby in for a Mitsubishi Evo. The boxers are hard to work on and don't like detonation at all.

The Mazda Speed 3 I thought was fwd, the Mazdaspeed 6 IIRC is AWD. BMW also offers an AWD 3 series a 335ix wagon would be fun if you can get it and Infinti offers an AWD G35 sedan. Don't forget the Trailblazer SSs in AWD alot of fun for a SUV. A couple of friends had turbo Volvo wagons in AWD with the boost turned up, they would scoot on the hwy and said they were fun around town.

Pro-Tour Heavy Chevy
05-15-2010, 07:59 PM
Suby X3. They have great reliability and torquey motors. There not hard at all to work on. The 6-Cylinders Legacy's are a pain to change plugs though, other than that their great and fun to drive.

Tony_SS
05-15-2010, 08:04 PM
Im thinking a WRX Wagon.

LateNight72
05-15-2010, 08:16 PM
I like Audi's. I know some hate them because they are supposedly unreliable. Though all VWAG products we've owned have never had any major issues.

DarkBuddha
05-16-2010, 04:09 AM
Depending on the kind of coin you've got to spend, you might consider any number of things. A Subaru Outback will have more cargo capacity than a WRX wagon and takes to mods just as well. Or consider a Porsche Cayenne Turbo S... not quite a wagon, but nowhere near being a Suburban either. Audi and Volvo both have nifty AWD wagon-like vehicles that offer good cargo capacity and drive quality. I think if I had my choice, I'd probably drop the coin on a Cayenne, but alas...

sik68
05-16-2010, 04:38 AM
I have a 2002 wrx wagon, and the stock handling sucks (super stable but lots of body roll and very understeery at its limits). But a really common upgrade is aftermarket sway bars and shocks and that would seem to to fix a lot of its ills. Mechanically though, a great car.

If you want to buy newer, I'd suggest a 2008 and up. They went up in price point but supposedly lot better handling and noticeably faster.

-Steven

jocko124
05-16-2010, 05:04 AM
Volvo V70R wagon. 300hp, 0-60 in 5.6 seconds and a top speed of 155 mph. But you'll have to get a 2007 or older model because they stopped making the R model.

rednecknate
05-16-2010, 07:12 AM
We have been considering a similar dilema.. We have a fullsize toyota sequioa while i absolutley love it and would still keep it My wife said if i get her a sporty non soccer mom ish wagon i could have her sequioa as my daily.. I must say I live in Northern Colorado And if you want a subaru Don't buy one here they are GOLD... BUt for good reason they do seem to be very reliable and They go anywhere with ease in bad weather But have Crap for storage... I rented a forester liked the room aspect but the cars performance left alot to be desired... i have seen some STI forester's but i belive they were imported..

GET AN AUSTRAILIN Holden Awd LS1 wagon.... Man why ca;t we have cool stuff like that in the Us..... I guess we had to make some compromise for having the hot women!!!!:yum: LOL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uD-jG4tVTDo

DaveJS
05-16-2010, 07:18 AM
Just saw a Chrysler 300 wagon AWD with a Hemi

Hartz
05-16-2010, 07:45 AM
Cadillac CTS sport wagon?

Scott Parkhurst
05-16-2010, 08:05 AM
We were looking at AWD Magnum wagons when we saw an Audi A4 Quattro Avant (wagon). Then we drove it.

Now we have an Audi A4 Quattro Avant. 2.8 V-6 AWD, really comfy, a slew of airbags, decent mileage, and the wife loves it- especially in winter.

If I could afford one, I'd be all over that Caddy wagon.

andrewb70
05-16-2010, 09:05 AM
STi Wagon FTW!

Andrew

MonzaRacer
05-16-2010, 09:24 AM
saw a guy take a bravada driveline/frame and mate it to g body wagon,,,, then he swapped in some cyclone parts tada awd storage/carrying and great power to mpg ratio
Bild vs buy I always have to do.
See s/t trucks are based off of gbody frame/chassis sooooo.

1969CamaroRS
05-16-2010, 09:35 AM
Got my wife a 2010 Suby AWD Outback for Christmas this year (she had always wanted one being her dream car). Never was really fan, but after having driven it off-road, trips and just around town, its a very nice crossover. The ride is very nice both on and off road, it has great ground clearance (8.7"), and even has paddle shifters :)

Definitely worth a test drive.

vintageracer
05-16-2010, 10:47 AM
Look at an AWD Ford Flex. Lot's of room, drives good & reasonable fuel mileage.

If you want HP go for the Eco-Tec Flex with 365 HP Twin Turbo.

Tony_SS
05-16-2010, 11:12 AM
No new cars for me! My budget is NADA value used. :)


I have a 2002 wrx wagon, and the stock handling sucks (super stable but lots of body roll and very understeery at its limits). But a really common upgrade is aftermarket sway bars and shocks and that would seem to to fix a lot of its ills. Mechanically though, a great car.

After taking a Suburban with a 6" lift and 35" tires through some twisty hills in the rain, that stock WRX wagon handle like a dream to me!

I think I've decided on a Suburu AWD of some sort.. be it an Outback, Sedan or WRX, each one sounds nice for a crossover driver. I like the best of all worlds.. quickness, agility, cargo room and mpg.

Jarcaines
05-16-2010, 07:11 PM
No new cars for me! My budget is NADA value used. :)



After taking a Suburban with a 6" lift and 35" tires through some twisty hills in the rain, that stock WRX wagon handle like a dream to me!

I think I've decided on a Suburu AWD of some sort.. be it an Outback, Sedan or WRX, each one sounds nice for a crossover driver. I like the best of all worlds.. quickness, agility, cargo room and mpg.

We have a Legacy sedan, love it.

dipren443
05-16-2010, 07:50 PM
We have a Legacy sedan, love it.

Big nod for a Subie wagon here. Mine is an ultra rare 2005 GT with a 5 speed. :) Slightly lowered on factory JDM Spec B struts and springs. Loads of fun in the snow. It is impossible to get the car out of line in the dry, and I drive the car like a hooligan. In the rain? Just as sure footed. In the snow? Throttle oversteer is easily attainable and very predictable.

https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif

Lowend
05-16-2010, 07:56 PM
I've owned 3 Impreza chassis Subaru's and loved them all. Handling is more than good enough for a street car, and the 2 Wagons held a ton of stuff.
Go out and find a 2004-2007 WRX Wagon with a Manual. Buy a set of swaybars, and a Cobb Accessport (http://www.cobbtuning.com/)(ECM Tuner) you will not be disappointed.

Was also VERY impressed with the VW Jetta TDI wagon, but they are $30K+

sik68
05-16-2010, 09:06 PM
Oh, 1 more thing about the wrx's is that there is not a lot of sound deadening material in the car, so I find that a lot of road noise comes through the car. It doesn't bother me personally as a commuter car, but it's kind of aggravating to have to a conversation over road noise. When you test drive see if it bothers you (heavily dependent on tire choice though). As a family car a legacy wagon is quieter.

Again, it's a great car, I'm just focusing on the weak points so you're well informed. Even with the flat 4, spark plug changes are an easy DIY job. The wagons even have a tow rating!

+1 on the accessport

Ash
05-16-2010, 10:47 PM
I've got a 2000 Volvo V70 XC AWD. The drive-train is the same as a V70R. For the 97-00 (the most inexpensive) The "full time AWD" system on these is an absolute Joke compared to other automakers. If you do all your own maintenance and stay away from the dealer, these are great cars that are initially really inexpensive for what you get. IPD's suspension and engine bits improve the handling and performance greatly (The IPD ECU upgrade/exhaust alone will take it from 190HP 210TQ to 230HP 270TQ...skip the exhaust and go strait pipe though)$4,000-$8,000 all day long used. . I love mine as a commuter, but it's a glorified FWD car. only sends power to the rear when slippage is detected.



I love the Impreza, but if I was going to buy a newish DD Subaru wagon tomorrow, I'd go this route in a heartbeat with the Second Gen 2004-2008 Forester XT (factory 2.5 Liter turbocharged) and bolt on the Used STI parts. A crossover size STI

http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-0911-building-your-own-subaru-forester-sti/index.html

OverView

The "secret" lies in the fact that the '04-08 XT model Forester like Doug's came from the factory with a turbocharged 2.5-liter engine very similar to the STI's. According to Doug, "The '04-08 Forester is basically a box-shaped WRX/ STI on stilts. Basically, if a part fits an '04 WRX/STI it fits on a XT Forester. The main differences performance-wise between the WRX/STI and the Forester XT are the use of a small TD04 turbo (same one found on the WRX), a top-mount intercooler that's smaller than a WRX's, a catted up-pipe like those found on a WRX, different ECU tuning (boost tops out around 11 psi on the Forester, whereas a WRX will hit 13 psi and a STI will hit 14.7 psi), and a fuel pump the same size/ flow rate as a WRX (130-lph rating compared to the 190-lph STI pump)." So as you can see, a Forester XT isn't exactly on par with a STI straight out of the box, as indicated by its factory rated 210 hp and 235 ft-lbs of torque, but with a few upgrades its 2.5-liter boxer can pump out STI-equivalent power and the Forester is actually 15 lbs lighter than a STI..........


Parts

According to Doug, the must-have parts to upgrade a XT to STI power under the hood are a STI non-catted up-pipe, a STI intercooler, a STI VF39 turbocharger and a STI axle-back exhaust system (although the front muffler hanger and tailpipes will need to be tweaked for proper fitment), a STI hood scoop from a JDM '02-03 WRX, and if you have an '04 XT you can directly swap (http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-0911-building-your-own-subaru-forester-sti/east-coast-swappers.html#) in a STI ECU, but later year XTs will need a reflash (and of course a reflash is a good idea anyway if you make some other high performance mods to your XT). An STI fuel pump will work fine, but given how inexpensive a Walbro 255-lph fuel pump is, that's probably the better option because it gives you some room to grow.
The beauty of this upgrade path is that all the parts are easily sourced for around $1,000 from JDM importers and in the "For Sale" forums on popular Subie spots like nasioc.com (http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-0911-building-your-own-subaru-forester-sti/east-coast-swappers.html) and iwsti.com (http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-0911-building-your-own-subaru-forester-sti/east-coast-swappers.html) or from Doug's favorite shop eastcoastswappers.com (http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-0911-building-your-own-subaru-forester-sti/east-coast-swappers.html).



Results

The surprising part about this pseudo-STI conversion is that it's not only inexpensive but also very effective in the power department. A stock Forester XT produces about 176 hp and 172 ft-lbs of torque on an all-wheel dyno, while an '04 STI generally produces about 235 hp and ft-lbs of torque at the wheels. With the above STI upgrades, Forester XTs generally produce about 260 whp and 300 wtq, making it more powerful than a stock STI. Doug was unsure why XTs make so much power with these simple STI upgrades, but some good theories include better airflow to the air intake because of the larger front grille opening on the Forester, better airflow to the top-mount intercoolerbecause of the shape/angle of the Forester's nose and hood, and perhaps even a less restrictive exhaust path.

it also goes on to talk about Struts being compatible with certain year SRX/STI's, Sway Bars being interchangable, Etc.

scott0
05-16-2010, 10:54 PM
The only wagon i would ever own would be a rs6 avant. twin turbo v-10 making 580 hp :) its just too damn bad they are not for sale in the us :(

since you can't have a rs6 i think that anything from the subaru family will be good choice for you!


https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif

ArtosDracon
05-16-2010, 10:56 PM
Syclone? :D

Lowend
05-17-2010, 06:53 AM
RE: RS6
I don't think he probably wants to spend $100K on a daily driver wagon

Tony_SS
05-17-2010, 07:15 AM
I've owned 3 Impreza chassis Subaru's and loved them all. Handling is more than good enough for a street car, and the 2 Wagons held a ton of stuff.
Go out and find a 2004-2007 WRX Wagon with a Manual. Buy a set of swaybars, and a Cobb Accessport (http://www.cobbtuning.com/)(ECM Tuner) you will not be disappointed.

Was also VERY impressed with the VW Jetta TDI wagon, but they are $30K+

Why the 04-07? I'm finding alot of 02-03's for good prices.. is there anything wrong with the pre 04 models?

Damn True
05-17-2010, 07:39 AM
The WRX wagon is pretty small. Roughly the same as a Mazda-3.

I would recommend a subaru Outback. Stay away from 97-99's though. The newer ones are nice. If you don't need the ground clearance of the Outback, the Legacy GT wagon is a bit lower, a bit more firmly suspended and is more often available with a manual trans. I had an Outback for ~8yrs. Loved it.

Of course, there is the Audi as well. The A4 wagon is a bit larger than a Legacy/Outback. Has a more sophisticated AWD system and more power as well with the 2.0T which is a more refined engine than the 6. The A6 platform and the "Allroad" variant is very very nice, but awfully pricey.

Also worth considering (though pricey and tougher to find) are the BMW 3 series and 5 series wagons. The 3 series is a bit smaller than the Subie, some have electrical and cooling issues. The 5 series are easier to find in AWD but are very pricey.

Damn True
05-17-2010, 07:41 AM
I've owned 3 Impreza chassis Subaru's and loved them all. Handling is more than good enough for a street car, and the 2 Wagons held a ton of stuff.
Go out and find a 2004-2007 WRX Wagon with a Manual. Buy a set of swaybars, and a Cobb Accessport (http://www.cobbtuning.com/)(ECM Tuner) you will not be disappointed.

Was also VERY impressed with the VW Jetta TDI wagon, but they are $30K+

FWIW, the Jetta TDI wagons can be had for well under $30k. We bought our '10 for about $27 loaded. Not AWD, and its a little smaller than a Legacy/Outback but its a really really nicely built car, and it's tough to beat 40+ mpg.

dipren443
05-17-2010, 07:53 AM
The WRX wagon is pretty small. Roughly the same as a Mazda-3.

I would recommend a subaru Outback. Stay away from 97-99's though. The newer ones are nice. If you don't need the ground clearance of the Outback, the Legacy GT wagon is a bit lower, a bit more firmly suspended and is more often available with a manual trans. I had an Outback for ~8yrs. Loved it.


Just an FYI. If you are set on the newer style Legacy GT Wagon with the 2.5L Turbo, and must have a manual... They were only available for one year (2005). The LGT wagon continued for two more years, but with automatic only. Legacy Outback wagons had the manual option with the turbo for a much longer timeframe.

ITLBTU
05-17-2010, 09:08 AM
Wow, no suggestions for an AWD SS Trailbazer? I know they don't make them anymore, but there are some out there, and I don't think you will be dissapointed. We love our 2wd version, and our friends love their AWD version. I'm pretty sure they were made from '06-'09.

go-fish
05-17-2010, 02:50 PM
FWIW, the Jetta TDI wagons can be had for well under $30k. We bought our '10 for about $27 loaded.

Outside of CA you can get the TDI Sportwagen for even cheaper than that.


....but its a really really nicely built car, and it's tough to beat 40+ mpg.

How about 48-52? I think the new TDI's get around 42 on avg. With my older fuel system in the '01 Jetta sedan I can still get up to 52 with fresh oil/filter/fuel filter and good tire pressure. around 210K on the counter too! Once you go TDI you never want to go back.

Back on topic though, when I saw this thread yesterday it made me think of the Trailblazer SS. Looked them up on Autotrader and was pleasantly surprised by the price of used ones. Much better than the Cherokee SRT8's.

Lowend
05-17-2010, 04:16 PM
Why the 04-07? I'm finding alot of 02-03's for good prices.. is there anything wrong with the pre 04 models?

Nothing really wrong with the 02-03's (known as "bug eyes" )
The 2002 5-Speed is known for being weak, but I had one for about 2 years and never had an issue. If you start side-stepping the clutch at 5000 RPM than... well...
2003 has a better transmission.
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif <-- that's actually my old car, someone stole the photo and used it on their blog

In 2004 they stiffened up the chassis a bit, and the headlights got prettier and the fog lamps shrunk. There were some minor suspension changes, but nothing that effects performance
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif
In 2006 they went to the "Pig Nose" But the car is essentially the same as 2004-5
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif
2007 got a better center console
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/pt/2010/05/2007SubaruImprezaWRXSTILimitedInterior10-1.jpg

iadr
05-18-2010, 04:06 PM
Well, I'm contemplating a Suzuki Sidekick with some suspension work, powered by a Mercruiser 4 (half a Ford 429/460) with a Boss 429 head, driving through a WC T5 mated to an AMC Eagle full time transfer case. Suzuki Samurai front gears, Explorer 8.8 swap in the back.
Biggest problem is getting it to sit a little lower without looking stupid or going to undersize tires (tough to get gearing any taller than 3.73).
Gott all the parts, except the Boss 429 head, which will cost more than everything else I've bought.

BA.
05-19-2010, 09:15 AM
Oh, 1 more thing about the wrx's is that there is not a lot of sound deadening material in the car, so I find that a lot of road noise comes through the car. It doesn't bother me personally as a commuter car, but it's kind of aggravating to have to a conversation over road noise. When you test drive see if it bothers you (heavily dependent on tire choice though). As a family car a legacy wagon is quieter.

Again, it's a great car, I'm just focusing on the weak points so you're well informed. Even with the flat 4, spark plug changes are an easy DIY job. The wagons even have a tow rating!

+1 on the accessport


Just saw the thread, guess I really don't need to mention the Subby wagons or SS Trailblazer. :)

X2 on the lack of sound deadening on some models. My friends WRX STi was a bit noisy and seats that were too hard for me to have one as a daily driver.

A very fun, snow capable, great cornering car otherwise though!

JayR
05-19-2010, 01:57 PM
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif

That is exactly what I was thinking. It of course blows the budget all to hell but there is no nastier wagon than that! So cool! If only more Americans appreciated wagons, we would have the RS6, The AMG E Class and a BMW M5!

PT Sportwagon
05-20-2010, 08:51 AM
I would avoid the Subbie unless you have the $$$ to replace the tires should one get blown out. With AWD especially the Subbie if the tires are more than 2/32 differance you will need to replace all of them or screw up the drive line.

I like the Caddy wagon. but then I am a wagon person. My DD is a 04 Yukon Denali XL 6.0 AWD, luxury, stablity and best of all full frame. Would turn most little cars back into pop cans.

Tim

1969CamaroRS
05-20-2010, 12:31 PM
I would avoid the Subbie unless you have the $$$ to replace the tires should one get blown out. With AWD especially the Subbie if the tires are more than 2/32 differance you will need to replace all of them or screw up the drive line.

Hogwash. 2/32 difference will not screw up the AWD system. Putting a different circumference tire on the car could.

It would take at least 1/4-1/2 difference, this is from the dealer. That's a new tire to bald minimum given the same make/brand/size.

dipren443
05-20-2010, 01:17 PM
Hogwash. 2/32 difference will not screw up the AWD system. Putting a different circumference tire on the car could.

It would take at least 1/4-1/2 difference, this is from the dealer. That's a new tire to bald minimum given the same make/brand/size.

My subie has been SOOOO solid. 90K miles and all I have done is regular maintenance. A set of belts, brakes, and fluid changes.

ROCK solid.

Lowend
05-20-2010, 05:51 PM
3 Subaru's over 7 years, no diff issues