PDA

View Full Version : Why hydroboost? Why convert over?



brrymnvette
01-25-2010, 06:50 AM
I see all these people wanting to run hydroboost or converting to it, but I don't know why? Can someone explain why it's better than running the vacuum setup? Is it just b/c it cleans up the firewall or is there actually a reason to do it?

wmhjr
01-25-2010, 07:07 AM
1) Eliminates need to run a vacuum pump on high performance engines.
2) Allows for power brakes in applications that prevent normal location of vacuum booster.
3) Allows for more consistent power assist.
4) Provides emergency power brakes if engine has failed.

AintQik
01-25-2010, 12:05 PM
Yeah, if you run a big cam this will allow you to run power brakes. Sometimes, there isn't enough vaccum with a big cam to get power boosters to work right.

formula
01-25-2010, 12:08 PM
It also produces a lot higher line pressure which leads to even more WHOA-power, doesn't it?

JChilders
01-25-2010, 12:38 PM
It's one of the best brake upgrades I have made. They feel much more solid all the time.

Mr.VENGEANCE
01-25-2010, 02:14 PM
was it a bish to put in?

what kits did you guys use?

ive been considering this also.

Taman
01-25-2010, 02:49 PM
When I get my rear disc brakes, I will convert to manual. I have a cam that puts out very little vacuum so I run an electric SSB vacuum pump. I is VERY noisy. I have driven the Heidt's Camaro with manual brakes. Wasn't bad. If I was driving my TA everyday, I would go with the electric pump. I am still looking to find an OEM pump that is quieter. Some Cadillac's had them.

JChilders
01-26-2010, 12:17 PM
I got my kit from prodigy customs. It was a while ago, but I remember it being really easy to put together. I did have some bleeding issues, but nothing serious.

TonyL
01-26-2010, 01:06 PM
We ran a factory GM hydroboost setup off a GMC van on my dad's 57 pickup. All the parts are factory. It stops like it dropped a boat anchor compared to the old vacuum booster it had.

Yelcamino
01-26-2010, 06:51 PM
was it a bish to put in?

what kits did you guys use?

ive been considering this also.

Call Paul at Hydratech (http://www.hydratechbraking.com/). I've bought 4 of them from him over the last 5 years or so and every one of them was excellent quality and the customer service was top notch! You won't be disappointed.

They're no harder to install than a typical booster. The fluid lines are the only added complexity, but if you've ever made AN hoses before it's not a big deal.

JRouche
01-26-2010, 09:36 PM
Not on a car, but its on my 12,000lb motor home. Talk about grab!! Just the lightest pedal push and it grabs the disks to a stop. So after feeling how fast they grab, and with some very high pressures I wonder if they would be difficult to modulate the braking on a car. No doubt the unit would be smaller.

But the question I would have is do they have the feel to modulate the braking during driving. I wouldnt want a braking system that is too touchy and it feels like its on or off. With a vacuum boosted MC you still get some modulation at the pedal due to the vacuum lag. A hydraulic/hydraulic system is gonna be less forgiving I think, not sure.. JR

killer67
01-27-2010, 12:40 AM
No vacuum better power assist

terryr
01-27-2010, 10:27 AM
But the question I would have is do they have the feel to modulate the braking during driving. JR

The hydraulic pressure is variable. The bypass valve is normally totally open. As you press the brake pedal, the valve begins to close. So a little brake = a little boost, full brakes = full boost.

pitts64
01-28-2010, 04:37 PM
I have a HydroBoost on my Chevy 3500 work truck and prefer a power booster... But then again it's a truck.. It might be different on a car...

My 64 Poncho has 10" at idle and the brakes get a little hard every now and then. I may swap in a manual master. I wouldn't want a Hydro Boost like my truck has... Just my opinion...

BTW) NAPA sells the hydro boost for a 83 Olds 88 Diesel at a fraction of the cost of one of these conversion kits..
http://www.napaonline.com/Search/Detail.aspx?A=NBB527200_0136023361&An=599001+101983+50052+2052006+11029+599999+109999 +59999+2999999

69bigblock
01-28-2010, 04:47 PM
I never had power anything so when I went with a power R&P so I then went with a HB. I would of needed a pump with a booster. My friend owns a junkyard so the HB was free..

silver69camaro
01-29-2010, 05:22 AM
Personally, I never liked the feel of hydroboosted brakes. The pedal feel seems artificial...kinda like what an OEM steering box does to a steering system. I prefer vacuum, or better yet, manual.

Rick Dorion
01-29-2010, 06:06 AM
I had hydroboost on my 69 and had some difficulty modulating in a surprise situation. If the car had been my sole transportation it might have been more natural. I think hydroboost needs ultra sticky tires minimally to maximize performance.

pitts64
01-29-2010, 06:18 AM
That's the way my truck is.....

ken67
02-19-2010, 06:42 PM
This may be a dumb question but can you use the hydroboost with drum rears?

Roadbuster
02-19-2010, 09:53 PM
This may be a dumb question but can you use the hydroboost with drum rears?

Yes you can.

gort69
02-20-2010, 04:03 PM
If you want to stop NOW, use the hydroboost. If you want to "modulate" your brakes , go manual. While you're busy modulating, I'm already stopped.

Modulating w/hydroboost is just a matter of getting used to it. You will likely stop faster vs. manual. It creates more line pressure.

No offense intended - just my own experience.

JRouche
02-20-2010, 07:28 PM
If you want to stop NOW, use the hydroboost. If you want to "modulate" your brakes , go manual. While you're busy modulating, I'm already stopped..

To be able to feel your brakes and modulate them is very important. Being able to feel the brakes and apply the force that is needed for the conditions at the moment is VERY important, in ALL driving conditions.

Pedal feel, or modulation doesnt mean the braking will be diminished or slow. Just that you have more control over the entire range of force applied. You still have the capabilities to give pull pressure at a moments notice. Its just nice to have the control to say when that large pressure is needed.

You really dont have a foot to stand on saying brake control and modulation is a worthless aspect of a braking system. And really. From your statement it is apparent you have not experienced much high speed braking and control. JR

gort69
02-20-2010, 11:47 PM
I don't recall saying that modulation is a worthless aspect.

I did say that Hydroboost takes some getting used to. I've had zero problems w/modulation or feel. It feels "different" but to say better or worse is pretty subjective.

And you are correct - mine is a street car, not a racer.

MuscleRodz
02-21-2010, 02:34 PM
9 out of 10 units we sell is either a clearance issue or vaccum issue. If your power booster works great, stay with it. If you prefer manual brakes, no problem.

Hydroboost is just like a vaccum booster in that it will mask brake fade. How many guys are driving their cars to 9/10ths? 1-2%?
Modulation works the same with whatever system you have, just a different feel. You can lock up manual brakes as well, just a little harder.

There is just as many reasons to convert as there is not too, you just need to decide which ones apply to you.

rickpaw
02-22-2010, 12:40 PM
1) Eliminates need to run a vacuum pump on high performance engines.
2) Allows for power brakes in applications that prevent normal location of vacuum booster.
3) Allows for more consistent power assist.
4) Provides emergency power brakes if engine has failed.

Not owning a hydroboost system I have a stupid question. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

I understand that a hydroboost works off of power steering pump, which in turns being turned by the engine. With that understanding, is the last statement in the above quote incorrect? With a stopped engine, no power steering pump = no hydroboost? Unless there is some residual pressure remains in the system after the engine has stopped.

jknight16
02-22-2010, 12:46 PM
There is an accumulator on Hydroboost systems that will give you enough assist for one or two stops with the engine not running.

It's the small cylinder that's off to the side of the Hydro unit.

a67
02-22-2010, 04:40 PM
Note that not all hydro boost units have the accumulator. So if you want the engine-off power assisted braking make sure that the HB unit you get has an accumulator.

And of course be sure to test that it actually holds pressure.

Bob.

rickpaw
02-22-2010, 06:11 PM
Got it. Thanks

67 goat
02-23-2010, 09:32 AM
I installed a hydraboost setup from HydraTech on my GTO and I absolutely love it. I had vacuum boosted brakes, but with my 236/242 duration cam, the vacuum booster was essentially useless. When the cam was stock, the vaccuum boost worked great. I have a factory disc conversion up front (from an early 70's A-body) with factory rear drums. I can't speak for others, but in my car, the modulation between the vacuum booster (with stock cam) and the hydraboost is very, very similar. Honestly, I think it's perfect. I can stop VERY hard, yet controlled, and with a bit more effort can lock the brakes if so desired......but again, I would certainly not say that they are too touchy. Tires are 285/40 rear and 245/45 front, Nitto 555s.

At some point, I will be updgrading my brakes to C5 fronts and LS1 rears.......will they be too touchy after that? We'll see, but I'm guessing they'll still be fine by me.

Thanks,
Jeff

nullshine
02-23-2010, 04:27 PM
removed.

gort69
02-24-2010, 12:38 PM
At some point, I will be updgrading my brakes to C5 fronts and LS1 rears.......will they be too touchy after that? We'll see, but I'm guessing they'll still be fine by me.

Thanks,
Jeff

I have Hydroboosted C5/LS1 on a Camaro, 275 rears and 245 fronts. Not touchy at all. Perfect, IMO.

67 goat
02-25-2010, 09:37 AM
I have Hydroboosted C5/LS1 on a Camaro, 275 rears and 245 fronts. Not touchy at all. Perfect, IMO.


That's good to know. Thanks!

-Jeff

RatTouring
02-28-2010, 10:39 AM
I was going this route, but decided to go manual with a bigger brake system - didn't want to add any more complexity and cost than needed. Was just going for simplicity with the brakes after living for so many years with a huge cam, 5lbs of vacuum...

MonzaRacer
03-01-2010, 12:39 PM
My 78 C10 has hydraboost, as it was factory diesel. Was supposed to use standard d52 pads but I always put semi mets on like MKD52, and right no it has Performance Friction pads and is very useable and I am able to modulate very easily and it has large rear brakes and when car trailer was behind it it never had problem stopping as its electric brakes need rewired(i hate scotch locks).
If your brakes are properly adjusted with an adjustable prop valve then you wont have any issues, period.

130fe
03-01-2010, 01:33 PM
I have Hydroboosted C5/LS1 on a Camaro, 275 rears and 245 fronts. Not touchy at all. Perfect, IMO.

Al, what size bore MC are you running? What kind of prop valve do you have?

gort69
03-01-2010, 05:59 PM
Al, what size bore MC are you running? What kind of prop valve do you have?

Chris -

The MC is a standard 1 1/8" disc/drum. It was brand new when I switched to hydroboost. Paul @ Hydratech said to keep it and not to worry abt the RPV on the back side.

I have the factory distribution block with an SSBC adjustable valve to the rears. (after the block)

https://static1.pt-content.com/images/pt/2009/06/DSCN01611-1.jpg