PDA

View Full Version : Y'all might want to write your congresspeople...



bigvegan
04-04-2009, 10:17 AM
...and make sure they have a "no crush" provision for vehicles over 30 years old if either of these bills go forward.

(Aside, the old Mopar they have illustrating the "clunker" in the article is something I'd drive any day.)

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/04/cash-for-clunkers-congress.php

"Two new bills that would pay American consumers to get rid of their old gas guzzlers in exchange for new, more fuel efficient cars are picking up steam in Congress. The cash for clunkers (http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/07/cash-for-clunkers.php) bills have garnered wide bipartisan support and could reward new car buyers up to $5,000 for getting their pollutin' jalopies off the road. But would the plans work?

Maybe. Ideally, they would simultaneously help spike flagging US auto sales (http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/03/obama-automaker-bailout-greener-american-cars.php) and decrease pollution. Automakers, unsurprisingly, are enthusiastic about the idea. They say the bill could boost sales by up to 3 million units a year. Germany and France have implemented such rebates, and it's spurred auto sales in both countries.
But the remaining hurdles are many:
Cash For Clunkers' Bumpy Road
For instance, what to do with a probably massive influx of old cars remains undetermined, and has some environmentalists worried. Also, the measure would be expensive—the program could cost up to $2 billion, and would have to squeeze it's funding out of the stimulus bill. And the vast majority of that funding has already been spoken for—only $3 billion or so may remain unallocated.
There's another tricky question inherent in the proceedings: would the incentives only apply if consumers buy American cars, or will the reward apply across the board?
If I'm an American consumer with an average working class salary, and I could turn in, say, a beat up old Ford Taurus in exchange for $5000 with the prospect of buying a new Honda Insight Hybrid for $19K (http://planetgreen.discovery.com/tech-transport/honda-insight-hybrid-car.html?campaign=daylife-article), I very well might make the switch. Then, I'd be sparing emissions, but not necessarily boosting the American economy. If I could only exchange it for, oh, I don't know, almost any American car (exceptions aplenty of course), then my fuel efficiency savings wouldn't increase nearly as much, and I'd be creating an entire car's worth of waste, too. But I'd be helping keep those grand American innovators at GM (http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/06/who_killed_electric.php) and Chrysler afloat.
A Closer Look at Cash for Clunkers
One bill is sponsored by Sen. Feinstein, the other co-sponsored by 19 different lawmakers in the House.
Between the bills, the proposed standards would be as follows (via the LA Times (http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-auto-clunkers2-2009apr02,0,7130899.story))


The House bill offers graduated incentives to people who junk a car or truck at least 8 years old. They would get a cash voucher for $3,000 for buying a new truck that gets at least 24 miles per gallon and was assembled in North America. A new car that gets at least 30 mpg and was assembled in the United States would qualify for $5,000. The new car would have to cost less than $35,000. Feinstein's bill requires that the used car being traded in get less than 18 mpg. Cash vouchers would range from $1,500 to $4,500, depending on the age of the trade-in and on whether the owner buys a new or used car. The new vehicle must cost less than $45,000 and must exceed federal mileage standards by at least 25%.

Feinstein's bill seems reasonable—but $3,000 for buying a new truck that gets a lousy 24 mpg seems ridiculous in the House version. Though federal mileage standard (http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/03/obama-fuel-economy-standard-disappointing.php) right now is only 25 mpg, so consumers would only have to buy a car that gets better mileage than 30 mpg, it's still a huge improvement from any car that gets 18 mpg. Whether this plan works will depend on the rigidity of the rebate standards, and whether or not a plan for effectively reusing and dealing with the scrapped autos' parts gets included."

CRCRFT78
04-04-2009, 11:07 AM
Here they go with this isht again. Maybe they should give out vouchers for a new LSx crate motor that passes SMOG to get these old cars drivable again instead of screwing us with SMOG laws that force many people to abandon their projects.

Better yet. Open up a shop that will help people doing swaps pass SMOG laws instead of the constant penalizing for not getting it right the first time. A $3-5000 voucher and a shop to help get it right would help me alot.

minendrews68
04-04-2009, 12:06 PM
I would really believe that there are too many very wealthy people with too many very expensive old cars that would cause too many problems for this to pass.

CRCRFT78
04-04-2009, 03:03 PM
I'm curious to see what percentage of old cars actually account for all of the SMOG problems. Most I know are either to nice to drive daily or are waiting to be restored. And those that are driven daily probably don't account for much compared to everything else contributing to the problem.

jackfrost
04-06-2009, 11:01 AM
I'm curious to see what percentage of old cars actually account for all of the SMOG problems. Most I know are either to nice to drive daily or are waiting to be restored. And those that are driven daily probably don't account for much compared to everything else contributing to the problem.


not only that, but the people that drive the older cars probably can't afford a new vehicle, even with $5k cash. I'm guessing they'll just go buy a slightly less older car that probably isn't a whole lot less of a polluter... :bsjerk::bsjerk:

stateroad33
04-06-2009, 05:28 PM
not only that, but the people that drive the older cars probably can't afford a new vehicle, even with $5k cash. I'm guessing they'll just go buy a slightly less older car that probably isn't a whole lot less of a polluter... :bsjerk::bsjerk:

:idea:We can just have the Govt. put regulations on financial institutions to provide people with insufficient resources the financing. Oh wait!

I love the comments section, plenty of American car bashing. One summing up that they would buy an insight full price instead of an American car even with a $5,000 because of the environmental impact difference, etc. Obviously another person who doesn't bother to look at the offerings of US companies. Last I checked wasn't the Ford Fusion hybrid was getting -2 mpg compared to the Insight. Also, don't the Ford hybrids use all organic and recycled materials?

6994lt1
04-06-2009, 06:00 PM
their is more about that on here too http://sema.org/

T_Raven
04-06-2009, 11:53 PM
This stuff is all pretty dumb. Someone said they would buy an Insite? Those aren't even made any more. And they are a tiny, slow cramped 2 seater.
Edit: I googled and see the insite is coming back.

I doubt that a program like this would affect too many classic cars. All the good stuff is worth more than they would get for crushing it. I would imagine the cars most likely to get turned in would be beat up 80s and 90s cars, but like Jackfrost said above, how many people that owned cars that could be turned in could afford a payment on a new car anyway? And I'm sure that dealers will find ways to keep the prices high so that even with the voucher they still pay as much as someone with no voucher.

The thing that kills me are all these environmentalists that want everyone to drive a hybrid. Well what if we crushed every car on the road and built everyone a new hybrid just to get an average of an extra 5-10mpg? All the processes involved in crushing/recycling cars and all processes involved in producing cars would have more of an impact on the environment then if we continue to drive what we have until we NEED something new.