PDA

View Full Version : Spectra Fuel Tanks....



trapin
12-03-2008, 09:49 AM
Alright....about a few months ago I heard a rumor that there was a company called Spectra that builds aftermarket fuel tanks with built-in fuel pumps specifically for LSX conversions into classic cars for around $600-$700 a pop.

What I want to know is; how do I contact them? Anyone have a website URL? Anyone have one of these tanks? And lastly...is there any truth to all this?

Thank you gentlemen.

stealth71
12-03-2008, 10:03 AM
Spectre Premium Industries

Here is an ls1tech thread, BRP carries them:
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-hybrids/962620-efi-gas-tanks-gm-cars-55-81-f-body-chevelle-tri-5-a.html

LSXfan
12-03-2008, 10:15 AM
yes....

http://www.rockauto.com/

look up your vehicle type/year/model, then under fuel tank EFI..the one they have listed will be a Spectre unit

BonzoHansen
12-03-2008, 10:27 AM
yes....

http://www.rockauto.com/

look up your vehicle type/year/model, then under fuel tank EFI..the one they have listed will be a Spectre unit

R/A discount code 'turbodiesel' nets 5% off.

trapin
12-03-2008, 11:32 AM
You people are beautiful.

Have I ever told you that?

MuscleRodz
12-03-2008, 11:58 AM
Tony, Spectra does not sell direct. We sell their tanks $595 plus shipping. I have sold quite a few of them, very nice piece. If not minitubbing, it is the only EFI tank I would use or recommend.

trapin
12-03-2008, 12:34 PM
Mike...what part number do you have for that tank? Is it GM32AFI?

MuscleRodz
12-03-2008, 01:47 PM
yes that number is correct and have several at our suppliers wharehouse ready to ship.

CarlC
12-03-2008, 03:58 PM
What kind of baffling and/or anti-fuel starvation systems do these tanks have?

Damn True
12-03-2008, 04:01 PM
It's just a metal tank right....not a cell?

trapin
12-03-2008, 04:03 PM
According to Phil at BRP.....

"This is a stock style tank with a factory look built to EFI spec with use of the factory gas cap and filler neck. This is not a modified tank and comes EFI from the manufacturing facility. The tank comes with baffling and sump to stop fuel slosh and prepped for the EFI and features an in tank electric fuel pump that produces 85-115 PSI at 50-60 gallons per hour. This is the perfect tank for a LS conversion and keeps the original look of the factory tank. The fuel tank is designed to work off any 12 volt system, with a sending unit is designed for any factory applications."

I would still call Spectra to verify this information.

Frank Serafine first told me about these tanks. I'm surprised they're not gettin' more buzz on here what with all the other aftermarket tanks starting at over a grand.

Steve1968LS2
12-03-2008, 04:08 PM
Tony, Spectra does not sell direct. We sell their tanks $595 plus shipping. I have sold quite a few of them, very nice piece. If not minitubbing, it is the only EFI tank I would use or recommend.

Hmm.. maybe I should run this on the Track Rat project.. to help keep costs down.

MuscleRodz
12-03-2008, 04:19 PM
Tanks are not baffled. They have a well in them just like new OE tanks do so the pump ALWAYS stays submerged even with low fuel levels. No starvation issues either. I have pics of the well on one of my computers somewhere. I have sold quite a few of them, no complaints.

MuscleRodz
12-03-2008, 04:20 PM
Hmm.. maybe I should run this on the Track Rat project.. to help keep costs down.
Maybe something can be arranged.........

Rick Dorion
12-03-2008, 04:23 PM
Hmmm. I suppose I could use one with a regulator for now in a carb application?

MuscleRodz
12-03-2008, 04:32 PM
Hmmm. I suppose I could use one with a regulator for now in a carb application?I would not recommend it. Very good chance of burning up the pump depending on the regulator used. I would stick with a stock tank until ready for efi conversion. Plus stock tanks are cheap. Spectra has those too.

tmadden
12-03-2008, 05:07 PM
Do they make anything for min itubbed camaros?

BonzoHansen
12-03-2008, 05:19 PM
Do they make anything for min itubbed camaros?
Not that I saw.

Phil also lists one tank number for 70-81, but that cannot be correct. 70-73, 74-77, 78-81 are different tanks/necks. Spectra only lists 70-73 IIRC

MuscleRodz
12-03-2008, 06:29 PM
Do they make anything for min itubbed camaros?
No they don't

MuscleRodz
12-03-2008, 06:32 PM
Not that I saw.

Phil also lists one tank number for 70-81, but that cannot be correct. 70-73, 74-77, 78-81 are different tanks/necks. Spectra only lists 70-73 IIRCThere are two 70-73 tanks, one with emmissions, one without, and they only go to 73 for efi tanks

CarlC
12-03-2008, 07:07 PM
Pics would be great.

BonzoHansen
12-03-2008, 07:23 PM
There are two 70-73 tanks, one with emmissions, one without, and they only go to 73 for efi tanks

Correct. I discount that for swaps, lol.

stealth71
12-03-2008, 07:44 PM
I think this is an A-Body tank, but you get the idea. Pictures from the other thread.
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif

https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif

https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif

andrewb70
12-04-2008, 10:05 AM
Nice. Does anyone know what the pump output is like?

Andrew

mhotel1
12-04-2008, 10:22 AM
Mine just came in last night from Rockauto....looks great..made in Canada...
I read the pump is stock capacity and Gm part number that comes in Tahoe/Suburban/Trucks..all though cannot remember where

mhotel1
12-04-2008, 10:41 AM
aw here it was

http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-hybrids/962620-efi-gas-tanks-gm-cars-55-81-f-body-chevelle-tri-5-a.html#post9839849

CarlC
12-04-2008, 07:05 PM
So is that just a small sump on the bottom of the tank? That might work for straight and normal driving but it won't keep the pump submerged if cornering hard. Current OE setups use a venturi pump and bucket reservoir to overcome low-fuel cornering starvation problems.

MuscleRodz
12-04-2008, 07:12 PM
So is that just a small sump on the bottom of the tank? That might work for straight and normal driving but it won't keep the pump submerged if cornering hard. Current OE setups use a venturi pump and bucket reservoir to overcome low-fuel cornering starvation problems. nope, it is a bucket reservoir, pic is a little decieving. Depending on the tank, 5"-6" tall, about 8" square. Pump is from a late model Chevy truck, I don't remember which one right now. I have a tank on its way to me now. I could give some better pics of the well with dimensions once it arrives.

Rag-Rat
12-06-2008, 02:49 PM
I need some persuading to talk me into one of these over a Rick's. I am going EFI and at first I wanted a stock look and did not know about these tanks. So I researched the Rick's Stainless tanks and like the way they look on cars. Does one have a benefit over the other (other than price).

CarlC
12-06-2008, 08:22 PM
Thanks Mike. This has the makings of a great setup.

MuscleRodz
12-07-2008, 09:49 AM
I need some persuading to talk me into one of these over a Rick's. I am going EFI and at first I wanted a stock look and did not know about these tanks. So I researched the Rick's Stainless tanks and like the way they look on cars. Does one have a benefit over the other (other than price).Rick's tanks are great tanks. Unless you are mini-tubbing or need wild HP fuel requirements, or want stainless, no need to go to the extra expense.

Steve1968LS2
02-04-2009, 06:22 PM
Alright....about a few months ago I heard a rumor that there was a company called Spectra that builds aftermarket fuel tanks with built-in fuel pumps specifically for LSX conversions into classic cars for around $600-$700 a pop.

What I want to know is; how do I contact them? Anyone have a website URL? Anyone have one of these tanks? And lastly...is there any truth to all this?

Thank you gentlemen.

Mine just showed up today.. GM32AFI for the Track Rat project. Looks good so far.

Steve1968LS2
02-04-2009, 06:22 PM
Thanks Mike. This has the makings of a great setup.

Behold the man that turned me onto these... lol

Steve1968LS2
02-04-2009, 06:37 PM
I do believe this is the pump capacity:


The tank comes with baffling and sump to stop fuel slosh and prepped for the EFI and features an in tank electric fuel pump that produces 85-115 PSI at 50-60 gallons per hour. This is the perfect tank for a LS conversion and keeps the original look of the factory tank.

Pump is the same as AC Delco EP381
with a 3 1/8" in diameter.

So, would this support your typical LS engine (ie, less than 500hp)?

Also, I'm going to pull it apart to see if a larger pump can be used.

It was just over $450... Add in the 'Vette regulator/filter (PN GF822) and you have a cost effective efi fuel system.

MuscleRodz
02-04-2009, 06:38 PM
You won't be disappointed Steve. They are the best efi tank solution if you have the room for a stock tank

BonzoHansen
02-04-2009, 06:39 PM
Mine just showed up today.. GM32AFI for the Track Rat project. Looks good so far.

Cool, can't wait to see it.

Steve1968LS2
02-04-2009, 06:46 PM
You won't be disappointed Steve. They are the best efi tank solution if you have the room for a stock tank

I did some noodling and it seems like it would be good up to just over 500hp with the included pump.

Anyone want to double check my calculations?

CarlC
02-04-2009, 07:03 PM
That pump is likely a 190LPH. 50GPH = 190LPH.

If so, no problem for 500HP. 600 would be the upper limit. Magnuson recommended a 190LPH for mine.

From the Holley site:

HP/2 = # of fuel

50 gal * 6#/gal = 300#

300 = HP/2, HP = 600

This is likely pretty conservative.

Looking closer at the above pics, is that a hole in the bottom of the sump? Is that how the sump fills? Does the pump filter cover this hole so that it acts as a one-way valve? Slurping up the fuel from the bottom of the tank through the hole?

MuscleRodz
02-04-2009, 07:35 PM
I did some noodling and it seems like it would be good up to just over 500hp with the included pump.

Anyone want to double check my calculations?You are correct, should handle most any stock LSx. LS7 may be the exception. If needed you could get a pump upgrade from someone like Racetronix good up to around 650hp

MuscleRodz
02-04-2009, 07:42 PM
That pump is likely a 190LPH. 50GPH = 190LPH.

If so, no problem for 500HP. 600 would be the upper limit. Magnuson recommended a 190LPH for mine.

From the Holley site:

HP/2 = # of fuel

50 gal * 6#/gal = 300#

300 = HP/2, HP = 600

This is likely pretty conservative.

Looking closer at the above pics, is that a hole in the bottom of the sump? Is that how the sump fills? Does the pump filter cover this hole so that it acts as a one-way valve? Slurping up the fuel from the bottom of the tank through the hole?The hole is how the tank self levels when not in use. The return line pumps unused fuel back into the well, and forces the excess fuel to run over the top of the well. No chance of starving the pump unless you run out of fuel. When you shut the car down, if the fuel in the well is higher than the tank, it will gradually self level with the rest of the tank.

BonzoHansen
02-04-2009, 08:26 PM
So that sump is deep enough so hard cornering with 1/8-1/4 tank will not starve the engine? Or am I asking too much?

Steve1968LS2
02-04-2009, 08:46 PM
So that sump is deep enough so hard cornering with 1/8-1/4 tank will not starve the engine? Or am I asking too much?

You're asking too much...

;)

I'm sure there's a math equation to figure that out. I guess I will find out durring testing. Once I get the tank apart I will let you know how deep it seems.

I'm sure part of it relates to how much gas is in the tank.

CarlC
02-04-2009, 09:29 PM
The hole is how the tank self levels when not in use. The return line pumps unused fuel back into the well, and forces the excess fuel to run over the top of the well. No chance of starving the pump unless you run out of fuel. When you shut the car down, if the fuel in the well is higher than the tank, it will gradually self level with the rest of the tank.

Thanks Mike. How/where does fuel enter the sump? I'm missing something from the pictures.

Also, if the pump and sender assembly go into what I'm assuming is the sump area, and recirculated fuel is intended to overflow the sump during normal operation, wouldn't it give eroneous fuel level readings? OE fuel buckets have the sending unit attached outside of the bucket.

MuscleRodz
02-04-2009, 09:54 PM
Thanks Mike. How/where does fuel enter the sump? I'm missing something from the pictures.

Also, if the pump and sender assembly go into what I'm assuming is the sump area, and recirculated fuel is intended to overflow the sump during normal operation, wouldn't it give eroneous fuel level readings? OE fuel buckets have the sending unit attached outside of the bucket.
When not in use fuel enters through the weep hole you see in the bottom. Sending unit sits outside the well. Only eroneous reading you should get is the same as you would with stock tank during accel, decel, or turn

MuscleRodz
02-04-2009, 09:57 PM
So that sump is deep enough so hard cornering with 1/8-1/4 tank will not starve the engine? Or am I asking too much?Well in fairly deep, and with the fuel being returned to the well, pump should stay sumberged unless tank is nearly empty and in a sustained long corner. Always a scenario where anything is possible.

trapin
02-05-2009, 05:59 AM
It was just over $450... Add in the 'Vette regulator/filter (PN GF822) and you have a cost effective efi fuel system.
Where did you get it for $450? I thought Mike said his were $595.

BonzoHansen
02-05-2009, 06:51 AM
Where did you get it for $450? I thought Mike said his were $595.
Rockauto.

Steve1968LS2
02-05-2009, 07:06 AM
Where did you get it for $450? I thought Mike said his were $595.

Rock Auto... I don't remember the exact price but it was under $500.

It'a hard to find on that site, better to just call them. Part number is GM32AFI

I've heard they have 5% discount codes out there as well.

MuscleRodz
02-05-2009, 08:11 AM
Where did you get it for $450? I thought Mike said his were $595.Rock Auto is killing me and have not sold one since the word has got around. I wasn't buying them from Rock, and they are selling them for basically what I was paying for them.

TrialRun
02-05-2009, 08:18 AM
I'll be mini-tubbing the car, but only running a 19x10" wheel for now, will this tank work???

Steve1968LS2
02-05-2009, 10:22 AM
The Tank

https://static1.pt-content.com/images/pt/2009/02/28044ti-1.jpg

The pump/sending unit:

The pump says:

SFP003
V:179
4307

https://static1.pt-content.com/images/pt/2009/02/mcw4lx-1.jpg

69LT1Nova
02-05-2009, 10:58 AM
:hah: "Rock Auto is killing me and have not sold one since the word has got around."

Owned!

Now if they would just make FI tanks for X body cars...

Steve1968LS2
02-05-2009, 11:32 AM
Rock Auto is killing me and have not sold one since the word has got around. I wasn't buying them from Rock, and they are selling them for basically what I was paying for them.

That sucks and I'm sorry about that. I would imagine they buy tanks by the truckload and get a discount.

Personally I would rather pay a bit more, get them from you, and get better customer service.

Rag-Rat
02-05-2009, 01:24 PM
Nice pictures Steve. I take it that the price included the pump AND the sending unit as one piece? Does the sending unit work with the stock gauge?

Steve1968LS2
02-05-2009, 02:08 PM
Nice pictures Steve. I take it that the price included the pump AND the sending unit as one piece? Does the sending unit work with the stock gauge?

Includes everything you see.. it's a 0-90ohm sender from what I gather.

It was over $450.. I think $480something..

JMarsa
02-05-2009, 08:04 PM
:hah: "Rock Auto is killing me and have not sold one since the word has got around."

Owned!

Now if they would just make FI tanks for X body cars...

Look around someone is offering X body for less than a grand. I swear I've seen them on here. I have an x body so I noticed.

--JMarsa

Steve1968LS2
02-05-2009, 08:58 PM
Could this be the pump?

http://store.getgmparts.com/fe0114.html

Lots of pumps on this site that look like the one in the tank but I would need to see the markings to tell which one this is.

Might be possible to swich out the pump for a larger GM one? Just thinking...

http://store.getgmparts.com/fuel-pumps.html

MuscleRodz
02-05-2009, 09:07 PM
Ask Tony Whatley if he ever installed his Racetronix pump. He said he was going to install one of these.
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/pt/2009/02/RXF99FPAt-1.jpg

Steve1968LS2
02-05-2009, 09:10 PM
I don't see why you couldn't.. I was more curious about the service issue (ie, direct replacement pump) and if there was a cheap GM pump with a higher output.

The Racetronix pump is nice, I wonder if they would know?

BonzoHansen
02-06-2009, 08:19 AM
Hey, related question someone just asked on NastyZ, I thought one of you guys might be able to chime in here or there...

http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1503535#post1503535

Can anyone post up wiring info/diagram for this setup?

thanks-

MuscleRodz
02-06-2009, 09:33 AM
I don't see why you couldn't.. I was more curious about the service issue (ie, direct replacement pump) and if there was a cheap GM pump with a higher output.

The Racetronix pump is nice, I wonder if they would know?
The pump is a GM truck unit, not sure which one.

CarlC
02-06-2009, 10:58 AM
A Walboro 255lph should be easily adaptable. But if Spectre says it's a 190lph that would be perfect. No need to heat up the fuel more than necessary.

Perhaps Spectre would supply a replacement AC Delco number for the pump? Everyone in the AM deals with AC Delco or Federal Mogul P/N's.

MuscleRodz
02-06-2009, 11:06 AM
A Walboro 255lph should be easily adaptable. But if Spectre says it's a 190lph that would be perfect. No need to heat up the fuel more than necessary.

Perhaps Spectre would supply a replacement AC Delco number for the pump? Everyone in the AM deals with AC Delco or Federal Mogul P/N's.Nope, they won't, I have tried.

Steve1968LS2
02-06-2009, 11:13 AM
A Walboro 255lph should be easily adaptable. But if Spectre says it's a 190lph that would be perfect. No need to heat up the fuel more than necessary.

Perhaps Spectre would supply a replacement AC Delco number for the pump? Everyone in the AM deals with AC Delco or Federal Mogul P/N's.

The pump is numbered, there should be some way to figure out which GM pump it is.

Would be nice to know what's needed for a replacement.

CarlC
02-06-2009, 03:25 PM
Time to make nice-nice with your local AC Delco rep Steve.....

BonzoHansen
02-06-2009, 03:30 PM
Nope, they won't, I have tried.

What are they suggesting for replacement parts? Are they selling pumps separately?

dhutton
02-06-2009, 04:29 PM
That pump looks like the same one Rick's told me to use when my pump died. Once I got mine out it turned out I had a Walbro pump but apparently Rick's is now using the GM pumps. The pump they told me to use cross referenced to a Delphi FE0114 pump that I picked up at Oreilly's. It was from a 96 1500 pickup with a 305.

MuscleRodz
02-06-2009, 06:42 PM
What are they suggesting for replacement parts? Are they selling pumps separately?Not yet, pumps right now will have to be sourced from your local parts store, or other aftermarket source

Steve1968LS2
02-06-2009, 07:48 PM
That pump looks like the same one Rick's told me to use when my pump died. Once I got mine out it turned out I had a Walbro pump but apparently Rick's is now using the GM pumps. The pump they told me to use cross referenced to a Delphi FE0114 pump that I picked up at Oreilly's. It was from a 96 1500 pickup with a 305.

Really? I would expect a Ricks tank to have a nicer pump like a Walbro or Bosche.

This darn pump has numbers on it but I can't identify them. I guess I need to find a place that stocks them and visually compare the numbers on the casing...

BonzoHansen
02-06-2009, 07:50 PM
Jeff Tate is a GM parts guy, get him in here...

dhutton
02-07-2009, 04:33 AM
[quote=Steve1968LS2;489591]Really? I would expect a Ricks tank to have a nicer pump like a Walbro or Bosche.
quote]

Mine does have a Walbro but it sounded like they changed over to the GM pump at some point because that is what he assumed I had in mine.

I did some more digging and this is the AC Delco part number that Rick's gave me: EP381

Turbo67camaro
02-07-2009, 06:39 PM
Would one of these likely fit on a '67 Camaro with DSE mini-tubs and a G-Bar?

I'm going EFI.

I have a GM NOS tank that looks like it will fit with my combo, but then again, I don't have wheels and tires yet, and don't have exhaust pieces to mock up.

trapin
02-07-2009, 07:56 PM
What is a G-Bar?

If you're minus the leaf springs than yes the tank will fit. If you mini-tubbed but did the offset shackles for the leafs, then no.

Turbo67camaro
02-07-2009, 08:04 PM
G-Bar = 4 link suspension system courtesy of Ridetech and Chris Alston.

MuscleRodz
02-08-2009, 05:28 PM
Would one of these likely fit on a '67 Camaro with DSE mini-tubs and a G-Bar?

I'm going EFI.

I have a GM NOS tank that looks like it will fit with my combo, but then again, I don't have wheels and tires yet, and don't have exhaust pieces to mock up.
What width rear tire are you running? Should clear with 315's, not sure with 335's.

DarkoNova
02-08-2009, 08:04 PM
Now if they would just make FI tanks for X body cars...

If they fit 1st gen Camaros, why wouldn't they fit X bodies?

Matt

MuscleRodz
02-08-2009, 09:23 PM
If they fit 1st gen Camaros, why wouldn't they fit X bodies?

Matt
Filler neck is different for one.

Turbo67camaro
02-08-2009, 10:01 PM
What width rear tire are you running? Should clear with 315's, not sure with 335's.

I doubt I'll go wider than 315s on tires due to the $ premium required to get there for wheels, tires, narrowed tank...just another consideration for my pending wheel and tire choice.

Thanks,

Mike

Skip Fix
02-09-2009, 11:35 AM
So early 65-67 GTOs different than Chevelles?

MuscleRodz
02-09-2009, 12:12 PM
So early 65-67 GTOs different than Chevelles?Yes, but EFI tanks are available for both. we sold both

TrialRun
02-09-2009, 12:17 PM
Just ordered mine for my 69 camaro project. The part number is GM32BFI, this will also work with the 69 firebird. I also picked up the corvette filter/regulator, part number GF822.

Moose
02-09-2009, 01:53 PM
Just ordered mine for my 69 camaro project. The part number is GM32BFI, this will also work with the 69 firebird. I also picked up the corvette filter/regulator, part number GF822.


thanks steve for pointing me over here.. I think this is the ticket for me.

Thanks for the part#'s.

Are you guys going to paint it? or clear it? or leave it alone

MuscleRodz
02-09-2009, 03:53 PM
thanks steve for pointing me over here.. I think this is the ticket for me.

Thanks for the part#'s.

Are you guys going to paint it? or clear it? or leave it alone
Leave it alone. It is galvanic plated and needs nothing

FASTRC5
02-09-2009, 05:43 PM
If I had known about these I would have definitely gone that route, Anyone wanna buy a sumped tank with dual 10s? LOL

Turbo67camaro
02-09-2009, 06:03 PM
Galvanic plating...just how rust resistant is that, say compared to the stainless steel used in a Rick's tank?

From what I've heard, even stainless steel can rust.

notchbackgta
02-09-2009, 06:38 PM
The Tank

https://static1.pt-content.com/images/pt/2009/02/28044ti-1.jpg

The pump/sending unit:
How about a picture of the bottom of that tank? I still dont see how that short sump area can hold enough fuel in a hard corner. If the sides of the area were tapered in or completely straight maybe but the walls taper outwards. Like someone else said GM is using a venturi can that completely covers the pump and the fuel returns to the can. With the GM setup you may lose 1/4 of the fuel on a hard corner but the tank is almost still completely covered.
I think that tank may be fine on a weekend warrior but not for track use.

s4dustin
02-15-2009, 06:49 PM
Just ordered mine for my 69 camaro project. The part number is GM32BFI, this will also work with the 69 firebird. I also picked up the corvette filter/regulator, part number GF822.


ordering mine tomorrow.
Thanks guys... you make these projects possible. Huge help.

s4dustin
02-15-2009, 07:08 PM
Just ordered. Very excited. Tank, filter, run the lines....clutch kit..some misc. parts and vrroooom :) a year + in the making. Thanks again guys.

MuscleRodz
02-15-2009, 09:01 PM
Galvanic plating...just how rust resistant is that, say compared to the stainless steel used in a Rick's tank?

From what I've heard, even stainless steel can rust.It will last for a long time. Galvanizing has good corrosion resistant properties.

Yes certain stainless can rust, but it is because of a higher percentage of iron contained in it. 400 series stainless can rust. 300 series much less prone to it.

s4dustin
02-20-2009, 02:08 PM
What a nice piece. I am stoked.
Just came in. One step closer. Thanks again for this great find guys.

Xlerator
02-21-2009, 10:35 AM
I am currently building a 73 Camaro and would like to purchase a complete FI tank for it. I recently called Spectra to ask a simple question but I hung up the phone still confused, can someone help answer my question below?

Rockauto only seems to have the tank for 1970 Camaro.

Here is what I found in my research www.tanks-to-pans.com (http://www.tanks-to-pans.com/)
1970 (w/o vent)= FN-GM42AFI
1970 (w/ vent) = FN-GM42CFI
1971 thru 73 = FN-GM42BFI

Here is what I find on RockAuto
1970 (w/o vent)= GM42AFI
1970 (w/ vent) = GM42CFI
1971 thru 73 = NOTHING

So... can GM42A(C)FI work for a 73??

HOTROD99
02-21-2009, 10:43 AM
My tank came with no wiring instructions does anyone know which wire is for the sending unit.thanks rod

Xlerator
02-21-2009, 11:05 AM
My tank came with no wiring instructions does anyone know which wire is for the sending unit.thanks rod

There should be three wires, Grey is for Power to the Pump, Purple for sending unit, and Black is ground. It sounds like Grey is always power to the pump.

HOTROD99
02-21-2009, 11:10 AM
Thanks, just dont want burn anything up. Rod

Steve1968LS2
02-21-2009, 09:16 PM
How about a picture of the bottom of that tank? I still dont see how that short sump area can hold enough fuel in a hard corner. If the sides of the area were tapered in or completely straight maybe but the walls taper outwards. Like someone else said GM is using a venturi can that completely covers the pump and the fuel returns to the can. With the GM setup you may lose 1/4 of the fuel on a hard corner but the tank is almost still completely covered.
I think that tank may be fine on a weekend warrior but not for track use.

The bottom looks no different than any other factory tank.

The sides of the "sump" (or bucket) are straight up and down. It sould work fine.

I guess we will find out when I sling it through the cones ;)

MuscleRodz
02-21-2009, 09:41 PM
I am currently building a 73 Camaro and would like to purchase a complete FI tank for it. I recently called Spectra to ask a simple question but I hung up the phone still confused, can someone help answer my question below?

Rockauto only seems to have the tank for 1970 Camaro.

Here is what I found in my research www.tanks-to-pans.com (http://www.tanks-to-pans.com/)
1970 (w/o vent)= FN-GM42AFI
1970 (w/ vent) = FN-GM42CFI
1971 thru 73 = FN-GM42BFI

Here is what I find on RockAuto
1970 (w/o vent)= GM42AFI
1970 (w/ vent) = GM42CFI
1971 thru 73 = NOTHING

So... can GM42A(C)FI work for a 73??
The difference is the number of vents. You can use the earlier tank with no vent if you eleiminate you emissions canister

Turbo67camaro
02-21-2009, 10:34 PM
Are these tanks galvanized inside as well?

CarlC
02-22-2009, 12:23 AM
Yes. I've never seen a steel sheet hot-dip coated only on one side.

CarlC
02-22-2009, 12:25 AM
The bottom looks no different than any other factory tank.

The sides of the "sump" (or bucket) are straight up and down. It sould work fine.

I guess we will find out when I sling it through the cones ;)

So how does the fuel enter the sump?

balljoint
02-22-2009, 05:32 AM
Made for own. $96.00 tank from rock auto, $20.00 fuel level sender, scrap steel plate I had sitting around and a sending unit with pump from 94 LT1 I also had sitting around. Also baffled the tank.
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif

MuscleRodz
02-22-2009, 03:28 PM
So how does the fuel enter the sump?
Weep hole in the bottom allows the tank to self level. Once fired, the return fuel is dispensed back in to the well making sure the pump is submerged at all times.

s4dustin
02-22-2009, 04:33 PM
Made for own. $96.00 tank from rock auto, $20.00 fuel level sender, scrap steel plate I had sitting around and a sending unit with pump from 94 LT1 I also had sitting around. Also baffled the tank.
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif
Good job! I wanted to try, but I got a little nervous....opted to buy one. I have never welded before, could of have had a friend to it, but......

Congrats on a great job.

Turbo67camaro
02-22-2009, 06:02 PM
Balljoint,

How many hours of labor did that take (approx.) ?

Mike

balljoint
02-23-2009, 05:17 AM
About 3 hours. Could not bring myself to pay the $450-600. Some places are $1000

Xlerator
02-24-2009, 03:29 PM
The difference is the number of vents. You can use the earlier tank with no vent if you eleiminate you emissions canister

Thank you Mike! How much would you be selling this tank with shipping? How close are you to Rockauto? I too would hate to not give you a chance.

trapin
02-24-2009, 08:28 PM
Mike I would also like to help out a sponsor. But I'm on a budget and can't afford that amount of difference. Can you work with us?

If not I understand. I just want to make sure I come to you first.

MuscleRodz
02-24-2009, 08:49 PM
Go to Rock Auto. I wish I could compete but they are buying direct and required a 300 piece buy in which eliminated me from buying direct. Thanks for at least thinking of me.

BossaNova
02-25-2009, 05:02 AM
Balljoint,
Did you take any pics of the baffles inside the tank?


Made for own. $96.00 tank from rock auto, $20.00 fuel level sender, scrap steel plate I had sitting around and a sending unit with pump from 94 LT1 I also had sitting around. Also baffled the tank.
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif

balljoint
02-25-2009, 05:59 AM
No pics, but I used a small $5.00 baking pan from walmart and welded to the bottom of the tank. Then drilled a hole on the side to allow gas in and slowly out. Pump and strainer sits in it nice. Pan is about 7 inches long X about 3 inches high. I am not trying to discourage people from buying any other product. I just wasnt born with a big trust fund and if I can save a few bucks, I will. I have more time than money.

MarkM66
02-25-2009, 06:32 AM
No pics, but I used a small $5.00 baking pan from walmart and welded to the bottom of the tank. Then drilled a hole on the side to allow gas in and slowly out. Pump and strainer sits in it nice. Pan is about 7 inches long X about 3 inches high. I am not trying to discourage people from buying any other product. I just wasnt born with a big trust fund and if I can save a few bucks, I will. I have more time than money.

Did you mig weld that piece in?

balljoint
02-25-2009, 07:54 AM
yes, slowly. Then pressurized air into the tank with soap water on the welds to find the small leaks.

MarkM66
02-25-2009, 08:05 AM
yes, slowly. Then pressurized air into the tank with soap water on the welds to find the small leaks.

Thanks. I'd imagine the metal on those tanks are fairly thin.

Xlerator
02-25-2009, 09:29 AM
Go to Rock Auto. I wish I could compete but they are buying direct and required a 300 piece buy in which eliminated me from buying direct. Thanks for at least thinking of me.

Thanks Mike, I did go to RockAuto but I found out that I got charged Sales Tax, no biggie. RockAuto is based in Madison WI, therefore I got taxed, oh well.

Thanks for the help!

b-man
02-25-2009, 09:12 PM
Thanks Mike, I did go to RockAuto but I found out that I got charged Sales Tax, no biggie. RockAuto is based in Madison WI, therefore I got taxed, oh well.

Thanks for the help!Probably saved a little bit on shipping compared to what I paid to get mine to So Cal, cost me about $75 for shipping.

Karch
02-27-2009, 05:51 PM
Great thread.

Don't forget about the 91-96 Impala/Caprice/Roadmaster (sdn) tanks. They are plastic, big, and can fit quite a few applications.

BossaNova
02-28-2009, 08:40 AM
Do tell!


Great thread.

Don't forget about the 91-96 Impala/Caprice/Roadmaster (sdn) tanks. They are plastic, big, and can fit quite a few applications.

Karch
02-28-2009, 10:24 AM
Do tell!

If you do a search, there's a guy here that has a first gen (I think '69) Camaro that put one in with little modifications. I think he used a heat gun on one corner of the tank to massage it to fit.

My buddy has a '73 Grand Am and he said it's fitting perfectly, and my '65 GTO, while I don't have it in yet, it should fit w/o too much modification.

On mine, I am cutting out a 12"x12" section of my trunk floor and adding an access panel, which you can buy for about $15-$20, that is basically a hinged door so you can access the pump/pickup module.

I may need to raise my trunk floor a bit in the middle to clear the hump on the tank, but for what you can get a tank for at the junkyard, it does make an inexpensive alternative.

I got a spare pump/pickup module that I removed the pump from and have the option of using it to feed an external pump, whether carb or efi, though it won't be sumped (preferred).

But, these Spectra tanks are also a very nice option.

Lastly, I believe Walbro makes a 255 lph high and standard pressure pump that will fit without much trouble.

just chevy
03-04-2009, 02:15 PM
i need a stock gas tank that will bolt up in the stock location with built in pump that will work on my 66 nova with LS2 engine anyone know where i can get one besides Rockvalley

SSable
03-04-2009, 08:58 PM
Does any know the line sizes coming off the spectra tank 3/8? 5/16?

Thanks

BossaNova
03-05-2009, 07:24 AM
I pm'd you.
I hope the big shots are cruising this forum......Chevy II's need love too!



i need a stock gas tank that will bolt up in the stock location with built in pump that will work on my 66 nova with LS2 engine anyone know where i can get one besides Rockvalley

MuscleRodz
03-05-2009, 08:18 AM
Does any know the line sizes coming off the spectra tank 3/8? 5/16?

ThanksFeed is a 3/8" line with SAE 45* flare. Return is 5/16"

Derek69SS
03-10-2009, 04:38 PM
I'm not finding a part number anywhere for a 68-69 tank... Mike, your site lists GM37BFI as 64-69, but I don't think that's right (maybe I'm wrong on that???)

Derek69SS
03-16-2009, 06:08 AM
I'm not finding a part number anywhere for a 68-69 tank... Mike, your site lists GM37BFI as 64-69, but I don't think that's right (maybe I'm wrong on that???)

https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif
Anyone? Anyone?

69 Chevelle tank...

Mr Nick
03-21-2009, 03:33 PM
I would not recommend it. Very good chance of burning up the pump depending on the regulator used. I would stick with a stock tank until ready for efi conversion. Plus stock tanks are cheap. Spectra has those too.

What is the correct regulator that would be needed to run this with a carb?

s4dustin
03-21-2009, 08:13 PM
Does anyone have the part number for the Corvette regulartor quick disconnect ? Also, where do you place the regulator? Where is the corvette regulator located?

Mr Nick
03-21-2009, 10:22 PM
What is the correct regulator that would be needed to run this with a carb?


Possibly this? The notes even say its for an EFI pump, but running a carb.

http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=PFS-10653&N=700+4294925239+4294839053+4294880914+4294891681+ 4294880896+4294793282+115&autoview=sku

or this

http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=AEI-13301&N=700+4294880914+4294925239+400300+4294891681+4294 880896+115&autoview=sku

The Aeromotive product comes with 2 different springs, so I could keep the same regulator when I do switch to EFI.

Chevy
03-30-2009, 06:57 PM
FWIW,
I am running this tank and found out last weekend the limits of the baffle. With R compound tires on the autocross track you are looking at fuel starvation at anything less than 1/2 tank of gas. Above 1/2 tank if you are a smooth driver you should be OK.

Also in mine at least i have never gotten the fuel gauge to work properly, it has the problem that someone here predicted...it reports full for a very long time, presumably due to the baffle holding the fuel level indicator artificially high with the flow from the return line. At 1/2 tank of gas by volume, mine still reads ~90% full.

Still, for the price, a very nice tank and pump. I have about a 400 HP small block, pump is plenty strong enough for me.

I am thinking about putting some foam in to decrease the sloshing...any opinions?

Paul

firstgenguy
04-21-2009, 05:30 PM
Well here is my experience with the spectra premium gm32afi. I bought one from RockAuto for 460.00 shipped. I scuffed and painted the tank not expecting any problems. After I installed it and put 1/2 tank of full in it I first found the fuel sender was not working. I heard the pump running but would not pressurize the fuel system. No matter what I did it would just run but would not push fuel. So I called RockAuto and the would send a replacement right away but I had to send the whole tank that I just painted back. Got my replacement within 3 days. This time I tested everything before doing any painting. Good. I again painted the tank and everything seemed fine. Car fired right up. Noticed the fuel gauge would go past the full mark when I filled up, no problem. So I went on a spring cruise and the car ran great till I ran out of fuel cause the gauge would not read below 3/4 ! Now I have to ttry to get another replacement! Anyone have sending unit problems?

Bryce
04-24-2009, 02:34 PM
is the sending unit and gauge matched? for example are they both for chevys 0-90ohm? sounds like the sender is a ford.

firstgenguy
04-24-2009, 03:17 PM
Falcon65, The fuel gauge is a 0-90 ohm Autometer. The fuel sender is 0-105 ohm. I did get it figured out. The problem is in the design of the tank I beleive. The in tank pump and level sender sits in a bowl that being filled with fuel returning in the same spot.

Bryce
04-24-2009, 08:54 PM
im glad you got it figured out, thats is a bummer that it is designed poorly. maybe some foam will help to reduce return interference?

notchbackgta
04-25-2009, 07:49 PM
Its not interference, the baffle area stays full with fuel and the float for the sender is in that area, not outside the baffle so the float is up all the time. They should have modified the sender arm so it sat outside the baffle area. Not as well designed as a GM sender from the 4th gen f-body

NovaMan
05-07-2009, 08:40 AM
Are these tanks avalible for the 68-72 Novas?

flgc

MuscleRodz
05-07-2009, 08:56 AM
Are these tanks avalible for the 68-72 Novas?

flgcnope

Custom Muscle Cars
05-30-2009, 08:57 PM
I got one of these Spectre tanks from Rock auto about the same time and just got it installed last week. Mine wouldnt pump fuel either, but i could hear the pump running. So i pulled the sending unit then the pump itself. I put the pump in water (to prevent a fire) and jumped wires to it (correct polarity) and low and behold it shot water about 8 inches. Next step was to check the polarity with a multimeter on the plug and sure enough, the 4 prong connector (grey) under the sending unit assy, had the wires crossed for the pump. THis caused it to spin backwards and not pump fuel. I pulled the lock out of the plug and pushed the pins out with a paper clip and corrected the polarity. Verified the sending unit polarity also. It was ok, so perhaps the person wiring these units had a bad day or few days and obviously these units arent tested before shipping. So after wasting a couple of hours troubleshooting the thing, flushing the pump and lines, the fuel pressure hit 58 psi and fired right up.
As far as your sending unit problem, pull the sending unit/pump assy and hook your meter to the sending unit wire (purple) and ground. Move the float assy up and down and measure the ohms. Also check to make sure that the float isnt obstructed in any way, it must float freely in the tank. If something is not allowing it to go down with the fuel level, it will cause the gauge to stick. This is the third component in this LS swap in a 67 Camaro that has not worked and needed modification or troubleshooting. Fun stuff...:machine:




Well here is my experience with the spectra premium gm32afi. I bought one from RockAuto for 460.00 shipped. I scuffed and painted the tank not expecting any problems. After I installed it and put 1/2 tank of full in it I first found the fuel sender was not working. I heard the pump running but would not pressurize the fuel system. No matter what I did it would just run but would not push fuel. So I called RockAuto and the would send a replacement right away but I had to send the whole tank that I just painted back. Got my replacement within 3 days. This time I tested everything before doing any painting. Good. I again painted the tank and everything seemed fine. Car fired right up. Noticed the fuel gauge would go past the full mark when I filled up, no problem. So I went on a spring cruise and the car ran great till I ran out of fuel cause the gauge would not read below 3/4 ! Now I have to ttry to get another replacement! Anyone have sending unit problems?

camaro2nv
07-08-2009, 09:24 PM
https://static1.pt-content.com/images/noimg.gif
Anyone? Anyone?

69 Chevelle tank...
I must be out of the loop also. I cant find this bad boy.

camaro2nv
07-10-2009, 01:31 PM
Heres the number I came up with. This is for a 68 Camaro
GM32AFI

steelerguy
07-25-2009, 08:33 PM
Got mine at tanks-to-pans.com...~$485 shipped.

Mr Nick
07-26-2009, 08:14 AM
I'm still considering this... but would like the fuel gauge to work properly. Would drilling a few small holes on the side (near the bottom) of the fuel well/bucket help the excess fuel in the well return to the main section of the tank? Hopefully without defeating the purpose of the well, which is to keep the pickup submerged at all times.

The T-man
08-13-2009, 06:53 PM
any word yet on this tanks ability to handle high G turning w/o starvation issues?

Turbo67camaro
08-13-2009, 07:37 PM
any word yet on this tanks ability to handle high G turning w/o starvation issues?

User "Chevy" reported earlier on this page that you'll see fuel starvation on the track under hard driving with anything less than a half tank.

It seems like the only solutions to deal with that are fuel cells or surge tanks.

bigblockcamino
08-14-2009, 10:14 AM
any word yet on this tanks ability to handle high G turning w/o starvation issues?

Tank will handle no problem. Issue is with the fuel pump. :idea: I would not drill any holes in the bucket, defeats the purpose of having it in the first place.

I bought a regular tank, cut a 4.5" hole in the top. Currently working on modifying a custom drop in surge tank using a aluminum overflow tank/venturi jet. This is the same concept the OEM' pumps use to fill the bucket up. I just hope the capacity is enough. Need a few more fitting and measurement before it done. Only downside it pump is external.

aray327
08-18-2009, 07:55 AM
i'm really late to the party on this one, but i hope you guys are still looking at the thread.

i purchased the spectre tank for my 69 camaro almost a year ago. the fuel sending was no problem, fired up first time i got 12v to it. However i have always had starvation problems and have never gotten my guage to read. I have spoken to spectre a few times, and sent my guage back to autometer to have it tested. autometer assured me the guage was accurate so i call spectre again. spectre told me to exchange the tank.

i just got my new tank and still have the same issues.

Did anyone get their guage to work?

Mr Nick
08-18-2009, 05:43 PM
Too bad Spectra hasn't fixed this, poor customer service. I'd get one in a heartbeat if it was a true bolt in deal.

68zz502fi
09-15-2009, 04:09 AM
I bought one of these spectre tanks for my 68 camaro,It looks just like a stock tank externally except for the SAE 45 fuel inlet fitting. I have yet to install it as the car is still under construction. Im running a ZZ502/502 with Holley Projection II MPFI. do you think the existing fuel pump will suffice for this application. stock ZZ502's usually make between 510-530 HP from what I have read.


Thanks!

s4dustin
10-25-2009, 06:36 AM
I got one of these Spectre tanks from Rock auto about the same time and just got it installed last week. Mine wouldnt pump fuel either, but i could hear the pump running. So i pulled the sending unit then the pump itself. I put the pump in water (to prevent a fire) and jumped wires to it (correct polarity) and low and behold it shot water about 8 inches. Next step was to check the polarity with a multimeter on the plug and sure enough, the 4 prong connector (grey) under the sending unit assy, had the wires crossed for the pump. THis caused it to spin backwards and not pump fuel. I pulled the lock out of the plug and pushed the pins out with a paper clip and corrected the polarity. Verified the sending unit polarity also. It was ok, so perhaps the person wiring these units had a bad day or few days and obviously these units arent tested before shipping. So after wasting a couple of hours troubleshooting the thing, flushing the pump and lines, the fuel pressure hit 58 psi and fired right up.
As far as your sending unit problem, pull the sending unit/pump assy and hook your meter to the sending unit wire (purple) and ground. Move the float assy up and down and measure the ohms. Also check to make sure that the float isnt obstructed in any way, it must float freely in the tank. If something is not allowing it to go down with the fuel level, it will cause the gauge to stick. This is the third component in this LS swap in a 67 Camaro that has not worked and needed modification or troubleshooting. Fun stuff...:machine:

I hear mine spinnning, but no fuel going out of it....what a pain, so close to hearing it fire for the first time in 2 years.....any specific instructions on what color wire goes where?

s4dustin
10-25-2009, 10:06 AM
Easy fix...had the fuel lines backwards...switched them and BAM, the car started for the first time since the swap! :)

trapin
01-07-2010, 10:09 AM
So.....back to the gauge problem. Is anyone else having problems with their fuel gauge?

Mr Nick
01-09-2010, 08:44 AM
I'm doing my fuel system this winter, I'm going to contact Spectra and see if they have an explanation/solution for this. It's just silly to put the return line into the same bucket the gauge reads from.

If it's a simple fix, I'll get one. If not, then external electric pump for me and a lost sale for Spectra.

notchbackgta
01-09-2010, 09:20 AM
Actually you want the fuel return to be in the bucket. Spectra really should move the fuel level sender to the outside of the bucket. This would solve the issue for everybody

Mr Nick
01-09-2010, 09:53 AM
Correct, I worded my sentence weird.

PhillipM
07-16-2010, 08:40 AM
Tank will handle no problem. Issue is with the fuel pump. :idea: I would not drill any holes in the bucket, defeats the purpose of having it in the first place.

I bought a regular tank, cut a 4.5" hole in the top. Currently working on modifying a custom drop in surge tank using a aluminum overflow tank/venturi jet. This is the same concept the OEM' pumps use to fill the bucket up. I just hope the capacity is enough. Need a few more fitting and measurement before it done. Only downside it pump is external.

Please keep us updated on your little project. Sounds good!

s4dustin
07-28-2010, 11:45 AM
Finally got the LQ9-t56-magnacharger 68 camaro running. Had a little tune done on it and it seems to be starving a little for fuel. I used a 3/8 steel line, any thoughts?

kurider
10-04-2010, 09:52 PM
Are they still making the spectra tanks? I looked on the rockauto site, but it wasnt there.

724tim
10-05-2010, 03:01 PM
try this link.
http://www.thepartsplaceinc.com/ocatalog/part.asp?VID=3&YearList=1967

BonzoHansen
10-05-2010, 04:21 PM
Are they still making the spectra tanks? I looked on the rockauto site, but it wasnt there.

if you have the part number use their part number search. i use that to find stuff there, especially delco part numbers.

5% discount code: CABB1F0E466F (enter code in the ‘How Did You Hear about Us’ box to receive discount)

*Larry, I hope it is OK I posted this.

khoult
10-05-2010, 06:14 PM
I am in the final stages of completing my ls1 swap and I current have new stock fuel tank. I would like to know if I can purchase the sending unit, fuel pump, etc… I do not need the tank.

kurider
10-05-2010, 06:59 PM
I searched it with the part number and nothing was found, wonder if the part # changed.

old66tiger
10-06-2010, 04:05 AM
I have been looking at the pump units from tanksinc. They use the 255 lph walboro units which lee at tanksinc says is the best units to use. you will have to modify your tank, of course.

Mkelcy
10-06-2010, 06:42 AM
I have been looking at the pump units from tanksinc. They use the 255 lph walboro units which lee at tanksinc says is the best units to use. you will have to modify your tank, of course.


Here's what I did in my '68, which didn't have fuel starvation issues running less than a quarter tank on mountain roads: http://www.camaros.net/forums/showpost.php?p=850246&postcount=1

Ishmael
10-07-2010, 03:45 PM
Finally something cool made in Canada other than beer!

69cutlassrkt
10-07-2010, 09:07 PM
I have a spectra tank. I think I have put 3000 miles on my car since I have gotten it. I always fill my tank up when its half full cause if I turn to quickly the engine might start to die. Also the fuel gauge doesn't read right. I just reset my trip odometer every time I fill up.
Though I think for the price its worth it.

Ishmael
10-08-2010, 01:30 PM
I just went to the local Car Quest for one. They couldn't get one and the person they spoke to didn't want to comment on when or even if they would be making more so I called myself. A guy I spoke to said they were "in production." Hopefully that means they will be making more. My cost is $564 Canadian and that's a jobber rate so if you can get one through Rock Auto or Muscle Rodz for less than $600, I'd say jump on it while you still can.

Ishmael
10-14-2010, 06:40 AM
Spoke with spectra tech this morning. They said the starvation issue was because the pickup wasn't long enough and they've fixed the problem. Also the sending unit should read correctly now but test it first. New batch to come out by the end of the month.

neki67
10-14-2010, 08:22 AM
New batch to come out by the end of the month.

Thanks for the update. Keep us posted!

BonzoHansen
10-14-2010, 11:48 AM
Spoke with spectra tech this morning. They said the starvation issue was because the pickup wasn't long enough and they've fixed the problem. Also the sending unit should read correctly now but test it first. New batch to come out by the end of the month.

now tell them to make the tanks for 74-77 and 78-81 f-bodies!!

Ishmael
10-15-2010, 12:28 PM
I don't see why they couldn't. Its just a pump and cup from a new vehicle swapped in with a compatible sending unit and new lines. You could do it yourself. I'll post up here and on its own thread something the some of the vette guys do.
http://www.vetteworksonline.com/ls1_conversion_fuel.htm
or
http://www.tanksinc.com/index.cfm/page/ptype=product/product_id=84/prd84.htm

67Soto
10-19-2010, 08:46 PM
YES, thanks for the update, PLEASE keep us posted. I just went to Rock Auto and they do not have them anymore. It seems like no one does??? Maybe they were just upgrading the pick up tube etc. so there is a delay in shipping? Either way, I really want to get one of these for my project SOON. KEEP US POSTED...

ErikSOCAL
10-20-2010, 06:33 AM
How deep does your tank need to be to do this? I have a Rick's tank thats 7.5" deep and would like to try this. I would've been happier shelling out significantly less money for a spectre tank and have the same problem..

"I don't see why they couldn't. Its just a pump and cup from a new vehicle swapped in with a compatible sending unit and new lines. You could do it yourself. I'll post up here and on its own thread something the some of the vette guys do."
http://www.vetteworksonline.com/ls1_conversion_fuel.htm (http://www.vetteworksonline.com/ls1_conversion_fuel.htm)

67Soto, someone posted a thread on ls1tech in the last day or two that the leftover stock is down to under $400 for some of those efi tanks.

67Soto
10-20-2010, 09:05 AM
How deep does your tank need to be to do this? I have a Rick's tank thats 7.5" deep and would like to try this. I would've been happier shelling out significantly less money for a spectre tank and have the same problem..

"I don't see why they couldn't. Its just a pump and cup from a new vehicle swapped in with a compatible sending unit and new lines. You could do it yourself. I'll post up here and on its own thread something the some of the vette guys do."
http://www.vetteworksonline.com/ls1_conversion_fuel.htm (http://www.vetteworksonline.com/ls1_conversion_fuel.htm)

67Soto, someone posted a thread on ls1tech in the last day or two that the leftover stock is down to under $400 for some of those efi tanks.

Thanks for the info EricSOCAL. I'm wondering if it's worth it though considering that Spectra may have fixed the starvation problem in the new design? Anyone know if they have worked on fixing the starvation issue?

67Soto
10-20-2010, 09:09 AM
ErikSOCAL, Can you provide a link to the ls1tech re. leftover stock? I am searching but can not find it? It would be greatly appreciated...

ErikSOCAL
10-20-2010, 09:41 AM
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-hybrids/1343126-spectre-fuel-injected-tank.html

I'd wait unless you know that the issue can be taken care of by a simple remove and replace. Using an OEM pump like what is shown in Ishmael's thread is the way to go. It also simplifys plumbing

Ishmael
10-20-2010, 03:08 PM
They were having a rust issue so they took a bunch back and weren't going to ship until that was fixed. They've got a run going right now. I was told to put my order in by the end of this week as they thought they would be out by the end of October.

Ishmael
10-20-2010, 03:11 PM
Thanks for the info EricSOCAL. I'm wondering if it's worth it though considering that Spectra may have fixed the starvation problem in the new design? Anyone know if they have worked on fixing the starvation issue?
I asked about that and the sending unit issue. Tech said both had been addressed but I don't see how they could if they are using a cup and no baffling or sump.

67Soto
10-20-2010, 03:23 PM
Ishmael, great point about baffling/sump. I read this on camaros.net http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=186401

Wes is saying he has a prototype and it works well, AND it has an improved "sump" design. Not sure though? I'm going to call them again tomorrow and speak to a tech who may be able to shed a little more light on the situation... I really want to use this tank BUT I like the idea of the 4th gen LS1 Pump. Can I make that work in a stock 67 camaro tank? I thought the 4th gen pump would be too tall for the depth of the stock 67 tank?

XLexusTech
10-20-2010, 03:25 PM
No they don't

why not just but it an notch them?

Z06vet
10-20-2010, 06:32 PM
The 4th gen pump assembly is way too long to fit in stock first gen tank. I was gonna mess around with having it modded to make it work, but ran acrosss a deal on a used spectra tank and decided to buy it. I still have the 4th gen tank & pump assembly if someone wants to do some experimenting.
Scott

ErikSOCAL
10-21-2010, 07:11 AM
I'm interested, whats the overall length/height? post or pm me any other details if you'd like please! thanks

gearheads78
10-21-2010, 09:42 AM
The 4th gen pump assembly is way too long to fit in stock first gen tank. I was gonna mess around with having it modded to make it work, but ran acrosss a deal on a used spectra tank and decided to buy it. I still have the 4th gen tank & pump assembly if someone wants to do some experimenting.
Scott

I once used a 94-96 Impala SS pump in a 67 Chevelle. I had to shorten it a little but it was a shallow tank like a 1st gen.

ErikSOCAL
10-21-2010, 12:07 PM
What motor were you running in the chevelle? I haven't figured out the compatibility yet between LT and LS motors in fuel pumps

ProSwede
11-23-2010, 01:39 AM
Rockauto have a another part number for this tank now...#GM32BFI instead of #GM32AFI....I wondered if this meant that the new design has been released to the market so I mailed Spectra about this and got this answer:

(My question)
Hello, I wonder if your updated version of your fuel injection fuel tank for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is yet released? If not, when will it be released to the market?

Regards, Andreas



(Their answer)
Hello Andreas

Yes the GM32BFI is now available

Regards,

Patrick Deschamps
Product Manager - Undercar

Spectra Premium Industries Inc.
T 450-641-3656 x2274
F 450-641-6113
[email protected]


He didn´t wrote if this was the new design so I´m not 100% sure on this....

Ishmael
11-23-2010, 03:28 PM
Good to know.

MrQuick
11-23-2010, 10:43 PM
Rockauto have a another part number for this tank now...#GM32BFI instead of #GM32AFI....I wondered if this meant that the new design has been released to the market so I mailed Spectra about this and got this answer:

(My question)
Hello, I wonder if your updated version of your fuel injection fuel tank for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is yet released? If not, when will it be released to the market?

Regards, Andreas



(Their answer)
Hello Andreas

Yes the GM32BFI is now available

Regards,

Patrick Deschamps
Product Manager - Undercar

Spectra Premium Industries Inc.
T 450-641-3656 x2274
F 450-641-6113
[email protected]


He didn´t wrote if this was the new design so I´m not 100% sure on this....
that doesn't make sence....the #GM32BFI is for 69 Camaro, with tube...and the #GM32AFI is for 67-68 Camaro. part numbers where always there. nothing new?

Magntik
11-24-2010, 07:36 AM
I just got mine (#GM32AFI) that I'm going to use in my '67 Firebird.
I could pull the pump and snap some pics if there is something specific to look for that has changed.
When I talked to Rockauto a couple weeks ago because I couldn't find it on theeir site, the guy I talked to said they were out of stock because of an issue with the supplier(that's all he knew). But told me to keep watching the site or call back, because as soon as they get more tanks, they'd show back up on the website.
I ordered Saturday and just got it yesterday.
If that helps anybody.

MrQuick
11-24-2010, 07:30 PM
can you double check the ohm readings at the sender for us please?

Rhino
11-24-2010, 07:56 PM
Would anyone happen to know what fuel pump is included in the tank? Is it internally/externally regulated? What kind of HP is it good to?

EDIT: I just happened to see earlier in the thread that it was determined to be a replacement for a GM truck and good up to 500-ish HP.

Rhino
11-24-2010, 08:32 PM
I'm interested, whats the overall length/height? post or pm me any other details if you'd like please! thanks

I just measured a spare 4th gen unit I have. It's spring loaded, to rest on the bottom. 10.5" maximum height (in tank). Minimum compressed installed height is 9.25". You'd need a 3.75" diameter hole to slide the entire basket in. I had been planning on using this unit as well, but don't know if it's worth my time. You may be able to shave 1 - 1.5" safely from the installed height.

For this unit to work you'd have to drop the floor of the tank roughly 2-3"

b25
12-13-2010, 09:54 PM
Can anyone who's spoken with Spectra summarize (in detail) what the problem with these tanks was determined to be (specifically with regard to the starvation issues)? I've read speculation that the fuel pump pickup might not be long enough, but nothing definitive.

I'm really hoping that a fix can be identified for those of us with the problem tanks/problem fuel pumps.

If there is no easy fix, has Spectra offered to replace tanks/pumps for those who have the problem units?


-b

dhutton
12-14-2010, 04:23 AM
From what I have read on the camaros.net forum they replaced the baffle pan with a larger and deeper one. I somehow doubt that these tanks will be completely fixed with this change but they might be good enough for street use. If you got your tank from Rock Auto it sounds like they are replacing them under warranty if you have had it for less than one year.

Otherwise I think the only real fix for these tanks is to replace them or add a surge tank. There is no way to upgrade an older tank.

b25
12-16-2010, 08:31 PM
I didn't buy my tank from Rock Auto and was hoping Spectra would make it right by sending a tank direct from the MFG. Reading through the various threads it is still not terribly clear what the 'fix' is.. I guess I'll try and call Spectra myself and get the ground truth.

Magntik
12-17-2010, 06:33 AM
can you double check the ohm readings at the sender for us please?

Sorry guys, I got busy with life and hope to make some progress this weekend. I'll yank the unit to get a good reading and try to shoot some pics of the inside of the tank.

I had emailed Spectra to get the range in ohms because I looking for aftermarket gauges, the response says 0 ohms empty, 105 ohms full. But I need to verify this.

Custom Muscle Cars
05-11-2011, 04:16 PM
I am on my second one of these tanks in 2 years with problems.
#1 Bought the GM32AFI from Rock auto for a 67 Camaro LS1 swap i did in 09. Wouldnt start, no fuel pressure, but pump was running. Took the pump assy out, did some troubleshooting, and the wiring inside the assy was all backwards, the pump and sending unit. I removed the pins from the connector to the correct positions, voila! Fuel pressure, car runs, stock gauge works. 100 miles later the pump dies, same SFP003 number etched on the pump, cant cross it. Figured out a 97 Chevy pickup Delco# EP381 from Orielly, fits and works. Put it in the car in 2009, no problems since, all stock 67 body/ suspension Camaro, LS1 with cam and T56 ran 12.20s at 117 in the 1/4 with this Delco pump. Most ppl say up to 500hp.

#2 Bought GM32BFI for LS2 swap in a 69 camaro a few months ago. Rock auto quit carrying them because they say spectra always has them on backorder, so we found another retailer had one in stock. Installed, car ran great, (wiring correct inside this time) no starvation all the way until the tank was empty so thats good. 100 miles later, the pump died yesterday. Same SFP003 part# on the pump. Called Spectra, they said there were problems a few years ago with cavitation/starvation in these tanks, so they have since improved the baffle/pan the pump assy sits in. The tech guy at Spectra says they use a delco pump and havent heard of any problems like mine. I put the new pump (numbers stamped not laser etched) and it runs great again.
I am using the hotwire auto harness on both cars, which uses a bosch style relay from the pcm to turn the pump on, checked that to 12+ volts to the pump everytime.
There are other options on the pump replacement if you cant find the delco. Check Orielly or Rock auto for EP381 or a 97 Chevy 2500 suburban with a 454. Oriellys price is about $50 more for the same pumps. Hope this saves someone some time and headache. :)

Magntik
05-11-2011, 04:44 PM
Wow, I had almost forgotten about this one.

So, I'm running Dakota Digital VHX gauges and pulled the pump assembly. Sending unit ohms' to 114.5 full and 0.8 empty. DD has a custom setting so I programed the gauge to the sending unit. So I should be dead on as far as fuel level.

I have about 500 miles on the set up and no issues yet. Mostly hard street driving and some smokey burn-outs.
The car was on the dyno last week and the guy say it ran great and maintained around 55 psi the whole time. And he ran most of the gas out of it during the two days he had it. Gauge said 10% (DD has a LCD read out that shows all the readings) and I drove it hard about 3 more miles to the gas station. Put about 15 gallons in it so there was 3 or so left.
No problems and this is the tank I bought late year.

Curious to see if my luck holds on power tour and Good-Guys Autocrosses

Custom Muscle Cars
05-12-2011, 08:23 AM
Magntik, I am also running the DD VHX gauges in this customers 69. I love functionality and adjustablility of these gauges and how all the indicator lights and message centers are integrated into them. I ran this car past 10% (0% lol)at the shop before i could get to the gas station and it still ran fine. I pulled and checked mine to ensure it was wired correctly and the sending unit worked. The sending unit from Spectra was supposed to be 90 full and 0 empty, mine was around 110 full and 0 empty. DD actually shows the current measurement in ohms in the fuel gauge setup. Perhaps my fuel pumps were flukes, so hopefully yours and everyone elses will continue to work.

SD455
06-19-2011, 10:07 PM
Has anyone has any luck lately with a tank for a 2nd gen from Spectra. I am going to replace my tank next month and wonder if its really necessary to step up to a vaporworx or someting similar? I am at about 600hp at the crank,and running EZ EFI with their pump kit. I believe the tank I want is the gm42bfi,or the gm42afi.

Ollie8974
06-20-2011, 04:36 AM
SD455
Check my response to your other post.

SD455
06-20-2011, 11:38 AM
SD455
Check my response to your other post.

Done,thank you. Still interested in info on the Spectra tank or a reasonable facsimile

rocketrod
06-20-2011, 03:06 PM
Done,thank you. Still interested in info on the Spectra tank or a reasonable facsimile
x2...

SD455
06-21-2011, 10:21 PM
Just seeing if anyone has anything to add?

k7king
07-10-2011, 12:18 PM
200 mils and my fuel pump went out at the Columbus goodguys car show.I never had the tank under 1/2 full. THANKS TO RICKS TANKS for giving me a pump for a tank I didn't buy from them. Guess what I'm doing now......ripping this POS tank out and ordering a Ricks. Don't waste your money on a Spectra

rossmacd
07-10-2011, 07:31 PM
I don't see anything listed for Fords... any chance there's a secret part number for a 67 mustang? I'd love a rick's but can't bring myself to spend 1200 on a tank when I don't make enough power to command that kind of $$$.

CarlC
07-11-2011, 08:14 PM
It's not power that commands the need, it's fuel slosh control. Any EFI engine, wether it's 100 or 1000hp, will suffer from fuel starvation unless precautions are made to control fuel slosh.

rossmacd
07-11-2011, 10:29 PM
It's not power that commands the need, it's fuel slosh control. Any EFI engine, wether it's 100 or 1000hp, will suffer from fuel starvation unless precautions are made to control fuel slosh.

Ibelive that Rick's uses better pumps designed for higher hp applications, and that is where some of the added cost comes from. At least gnats what I'm assuming. I'm sure the stainless steel is a part t too. My engine has been doing just fine with its stock tank and external pump for for years now, but I'm still thinking about upgrading.

SD455
07-18-2011, 11:02 AM
Ibelive that Rick's uses better pumps designed for higher hp applications, and that is where some of the added cost comes from. At least gnats what I'm assuming. I'm sure the stainless steel is a part t too. My engine has been doing just fine with its stock tank and external pump for for years now, but I'm still thinking about upgrading.

Mine seems fine with the EZ supplied pump so far,so I am leaning towards a more cost effective fix. What have you done to control slosh? I am in trouble at anything below about 1/2 tank.

rossmacd
07-18-2011, 05:29 PM
Mine seems fine with the EZ supplied pump so far,so I am leaning towards a more cost effective fix. What have you done to control slosh? I am in trouble at anything below about 1/2 tank.


I have no slosh control; it's simply a stock tank with an external pump. Once I get below a quarter tank, the pump starts to make a bit of noise. It was really loud with the a1000!

rohrt
07-19-2011, 06:23 AM
Wow I see they are priced at $360 on Amazon. Out of stock of course :(

rossmacd
07-19-2011, 07:30 AM
Wow I see they are priced at $360 on Amazon. Out of stock of course :(

Shoot. At that price I'll stick a camaro trunk floor in my mustang.

John Wright
07-19-2011, 07:36 AM
It's not power that commands the need, it's fuel slosh control. Any EFI engine, wether it's 100 or 1000hp, will suffer from fuel starvation unless precautions are made to control fuel slosh.
Carl,
Has anyone thought about using a pressurized bladder to always keep the pick up submerged? I picture a bladder surrounding the fuel with a certain amount of pressure in it so that as you use up fuel, the bladder takes up the air space(eliminating the air pocket) and the fuel pickup would always have fuel surrounding it no matter the level in the tank. I was thinking about this the other day...thinking about a cold water storage tank for a house that has a gas charged bladder...or is that a dumb idea?

CarlC
07-19-2011, 10:38 AM
The problem with any type of fuel bladder is that it needs to be periodically replaced, especially if it's collapsible (lots of sharp bends.) By the time you get done making something like that, you might as well get it done with a fuel module and not have to deal with associated bladder problems, labor, etc.

Water, that's a whole different gig.

John Wright
07-19-2011, 12:13 PM
^^makes sense...just a passing thought. LOL