mustang vs challenger cool vid

[Martin71RS]

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/H2H-Ep-14-Shelby-Super-Vs_188578.htm

wow :seizure:

[Scottem]

I would take the supersnake..

Too bad the driver couldn't be someone more qualified.

Kennebell put em' over the top.

Curious what an equally modified 03/04 SVT Cobra would do in the same test against the same cars. :secret:

[Restomod]

Great vid!! The Challenger was hurt by A/T and to small tires, the Mustang by braking but a close race!

[Vegas69]

Good video.....I am surprised at the weight difference. Those Challengers are monsters.

[Ron S]

Its funny that all the cool cars that everyone want,are remakes of the musclecars of the late 60's early 70's.Love them both,but they both need to go on a diet,and the Challenger definitely needs a stick.Nice to see production musclecars again though.Ron

[cityofthesouth]

Pretty much went how I expected. Both of em need to go on a diet. Would like to see the same test with more consumer factory cars - a GT and an RT or something like that, but these two were probably more matched. Good brakes and good tires would have really shown what all that performance is capable of though. If the Challenger proportions were more like long, low, wide instead of short, fat and square, and it weighed about 500 lbs less (or more) it would be getting my vote. 30+/- grand cheaper with fewer inches, and better looking, the Snake gets my vote without track time.