PDA

View Full Version : mileage vs. eng. weight vs. hp vs. cost??



kball
08-28-2008, 11:16 AM
Here's what's been going through my head since all this EFI stuff really took off. I'm leaving emissions out of the equation because the difference with respect to that is obvious. I have a 3600lb 71 chevelle with a 496ci BBC, 640hp and 590ft/lb-no power adders, tko600 and 3.31 gears. There's a million different ways to make that same level of power. Here's what i'd like to see:

1-Actual dyno numbers for your combination-not bench race numbers

2-weight of that engine-turbos, blowers all push the weight of sb's closer to the BBC realm

3-fuel mileage-how much does it really make a difference on you're in the 600+hp range, especially naturally aspirated what engine/combo is making the power.

Here's what I have:
-640hp/590tq,
-approx* 650lbs-alum. heads, water pump, mini starter, new style GM alt.
-usually 100-125 miles on a 16gal. tank which works out to 6-8mpg.

Realistically the same combination can be bought anywhere in north america for around 7-8k assembled.

Payton King
08-29-2008, 09:44 AM
69 Camaro, stock cube Ls1 (346 ci) made 425 at the wheels and 385 tq. Car weighs 3100 lbs. I got 26 miles to the gallon running 75 mph turning 1700 rpm (6 speed, 3.80 gear, 27 tall tire). I could add a 150 shot of juice and get it to the 600 number you are looking for.

Friend has a 69 with an LS7 and small cam it made 500 at the wheels and he gets 22 mpg running the same speed.

Both dyno verified

Both motors weigh in the 400 to 450 range