trackrat79
06-21-2008, 08:18 AM
Whats the point of the upper and lower ball joints on a spindle being verticaly offset, ( different distances from the spindle face).
With the turning axis of the spindle leaned in like that I would think this would take away from the turning grip and efficiancy.
is it done strictly for wheel clearances. I seems to me that having the balljoints dirrectly inline with each other parralel to the wheel face would be better.
when looking at open wheel formula cars, at a quick glance it looks like they have their upper and lower ball joints in a parallel vertical plane to the wheel face then add camber as needed.
Also curious about caster gain or loss, I understand the idea of caster for high speed stability, but what about low to mid speed cornering. When setting up a suspension do you design the caster to decrees as the suspension is compressed under braking and corning or do you just want it to be as static and unchanged through the suspensions range of movement as possible.
With the turning axis of the spindle leaned in like that I would think this would take away from the turning grip and efficiancy.
is it done strictly for wheel clearances. I seems to me that having the balljoints dirrectly inline with each other parralel to the wheel face would be better.
when looking at open wheel formula cars, at a quick glance it looks like they have their upper and lower ball joints in a parallel vertical plane to the wheel face then add camber as needed.
Also curious about caster gain or loss, I understand the idea of caster for high speed stability, but what about low to mid speed cornering. When setting up a suspension do you design the caster to decrees as the suspension is compressed under braking and corning or do you just want it to be as static and unchanged through the suspensions range of movement as possible.