PDA

View Full Version : Broken Air Ride spindle



bret
05-11-2008, 01:36 PM
At this point it should be fairly well known that I broke the passenger side spindle on the Goodguys Chevelle at the Costa Mesa Goodguys autocross in March. The fact that I did not make a huge deal of this [yet] has raised a few questions that deserve accurate and relevant answers.
This may be a lengthy post so I’ll try to break it down into digestible sections. The main questions seem to be: 1.What caused the spindle to break?
2. What have you done to correct the problem?
3. Should I be concerned about my Air Ride Technologies / Fatmans spindles?

What caused the spindle to break? The short answer is…I don’t know…yet. While I could offer some informed opinions and guesses, I think it is important to make sure this kind of information is as accurate as possible. While anyone else participating in this discussion is at liberty to offer an opinion I feel that as owner of Air Ride Technologies, I need to be held to a higher standard of credibility concerning my own products.
The spindle broke at the transition from the inner bearing surface to the larger seal surface. The wheel/rotor/spindle pin/caliper assembly did significant damage to the right front fender, inner fender, and door of the Chevelle. After the wheels left the car we slid about 150 feet on the lower control arm. The wheels assembly rolled slowly across the autocross track, hit the fence and fell over. I was going about 35 mph when this happened. I’ll get some images of the spindle up asap. The damage to my pocketbook was significant…fortunately Grundy Insurance was great to work with and settled promptly.
Here are the facts about the car: 1970 Chevelle – 540 Bill Mitchell engine and a Bowler 4L80 trans. Weight is around 4000 lbs with about 2200 of that on the frontend [I’ll find the weight sheets tomorrow]. The front suspension is our StrongArms with ShockWaves, the taller Fatmans spindles and our MuscleBar swaybar and PosiLinks. We are using a 245/45-18 BFG KD tire on a 18x8 Intro wheel and Wilwood 13” 6 piston brakes.
This car has approx. 7000 driven miles and another 5000 or so in the Goodguys trailer. It has participated in 7 autocrosses so far. Anyone who has seen me drive this can tell you that it gets driven “11/10ths” all the time. We have used up 6 sets of front tires on the car so far.
Here are the facts about the spindle: The Fatmans spindle is a one piece forged steel unit, just like the oem GM Camaro/Chevelle spindles. When I can get the exact material and heat treatment I will publish those as well. The first run of the units were 2.75” taller than oem [ball joint to ball joint] to improve the camber gain characteristics. The steering arm location was moved down slightly to improve the bumpsteer on the Chevelle. It retains oem style brake mounting so any brake system for a Camaro or a Chevelle will fit. Subsequent production runs were revised to a shorter 1.75” dimension over oem height because Fatmans found that some customers were having balljoint bind problems at complete compression if using stock control arms and a “street” alignment. Although this made the camber curve a bit shallower, it is likely more appropriate for street tires and street alignment specs. Brent tells me that these spindles are made offshore. This does not surprise nor concern me…a large majority of suspension components for oem and aftermarket companies originate from Asia and/or India. In my many conversations with engineers from the oem, racing, hotrod, and military sectors, material quality has not been a concern. Design and testing is still done locally, per the customer [as it was with the Fatmans spindle]. The forging house simply makes the component that he is contracted to make.

2. [B]What have you done to correct the problem? I have this particular spindle on my Buick GSX, my 66 Chevelle, my 70 Nova and now on my new 68 Camaro. I have driven these cars over 100,000 miles collectively, and have raced them HARD in numerous autocross and track day events. Because they are raced, these cars are visually inspected on a regular basis in many areas, especially wheel bearings, brakes and spindles. No problem has ever been found. After we broke the spindle on the Goodguys Chevelle I immediately [on Sunday] called Brent VanDerVort, owner of Fatmans. He immediately pulled his remaining inventory and my remaining inventory of spindles and sent them for x ray and hardness testing. All tested good. In the interest of overkill, and because I did have one problem, he sent these units out to have them shot peened and then re-heat treated. At this moment in time [mothers day] I do not have exact data about these tests or procedures. I will gather that information and share it asap.
All of this takes time. As much as we would all like to think that nothing could be more important than our “crises de jour” the hardcore research, engineering, and testing facilities all move at the same slow friggin pace…day in, day out.

3. Should I be concerned about my spindles?
I am not…and here is why.

1. As I stated above, I have used these spindles successfully over thousands of miles on the street and the track. Positive experience breeds comfort.
2. I beat on my cars. A lot. I have also let professional racecar drivers beat on them several times. Hard. If there is anyone who is stressing components more than we are, they hopefully have enough experience to inspect ALL areas of their racecar regularly. This issue has been covered on this website before with good reason. If you race your car you need to inspect it regularly. If you only street drive your car then the inspection frequency rate can go down considerably.
2. With the Chevelle failure, you are talking about a 4000 lb plus car, reasonably sticky BFG KD tires, and an EXTREMELY sticky surface at Costa Mesa. That track was so sticky that my 71 Camaro and Stacey Tuckers 69 Camaro were lifting the inside front tire on the hard corners. Those 2 cars had NEVER done that before. Sticky track = more stress on suspension.

With that said, if you are concerned then by all means take your car apart and look at your spindles. Send them back to me and we will replace, re-inspect, and/or refund your money for these spindles. If you are not comfortable with any portion of your suspension then it is truly worthless. I don’t want my product to be worthless. You need to feel comfortable and safe. My personal email is [email protected] ([email protected]). If you are reading this then you obviously have email…send me a message, I’ll send a call tag to get your spindles picked up and we will discuss how you want to proceed. It doesn’t matter to me if you bought them from Air Ride Technologies, one of our dealers, or the swapmeet…I’ll take care of them.

In addition, I am going to indentify and notify all of my spindle customers about this situation. As was suggested before…they deserve this information so they can have the opportunity to make an informed decision.
I will have a webpage up in a day or 2 with logistical details about returns, exchanges, and /or refunds.


In the meantime I am driving the Velocity Camaro with Henry De Los Santos from Chevy High Performance Magazine to the YearOne Experience in Atlanta this week [if we can keep it running] and will run it hard on the big track and the autocross with my Fatman spindles. I hope to see you there!


The rest of this is personal pontification…feel free to ignore it.

It has been suggested that my products are designed for street rods and therefore not up to rigors of autocrossing, roadcourse, or “pro-tour” use.

I typically don’t expend much energy to refute this…our performance on the track seems to handle that.. My secret is that I never told the car that it was a “street rod”…
Seriously, this is why I get to go to work every day. No challenge= no fun. I like fun. Take a look at our show and autocross schedule and come out to take a look or take a ride. Who knows, maybe you will get to witness more carnage. [I’m sorry that was just mean, wasn’t it?]
The point is that our products are designed for the vehicles that they are to be installed on and for the purpose the vehicle is being built for. You won’t hear us recommending an air over leaf system for a Camaro that is to be track driven. You also won’t hear us recommend a set of double adjustable shocks and a big swaybar for a 50 Merc that is a cruiser. Our main design criteria has always been safety, ride quality, handling performance, and stance…in that order. If you are a former mini-trucker you will remember all the crap we took a few years ago when we spoke out against frame dragging and reverse 4 links. [If you can’t draggit you’re a faggot…you had to love that] You can check the archives of sport truck.com for confirmation.


It has also been suggested that I am not qualified to design and build suspension components because I am not a degreed engineer. Make no mistake…I DO NOT have any degree at all. I never attended college or trade school. I have never made an issue of this, pro or con, because it just didn’t matter to me. However, in the interest of full disclosure it may be appropriate to explain some of my background. [I’ll be brief, really]
Like most of you, I have been building cars since high school. In 1987 I went to work for a rep agency representing MSD, B&M, Autometer, and a few other lines at the NHRA drag races. In 1990 I went to work for Blower Drive Service at the mobile display manager. While there I was involved with the early EFI development with Craig Railsback and John Meaney [he was DFI back then]. Craig and John are perhaps 2 of the most intelligent humans that I have met so far. Craig is who I stole the phrase “If I have to choose between the tape measure and the stopwatch, I’ll take the stopwatch”. John Meaney taught me to not confuse education with intelligence. Again, to clarify, I didn’t help, I learned.
I started Air Ride Technologies in 1996. I’ll skip the boring parts, but at this point I have supplied suspension systems for tens of thousands of customers, hundreds of award and race winning vehicles, dozens of multi-million dollar car projects, several oem concept projects, a handful of NASCAR teams, a few RV and industrial vehicle projects and a couple of high end military projects, one of which involves the V22 Osprey aircraft. Now, I know that it may be unimaginable that any project could possibly involve more money, more planning, and more engineering than a hotrod, but the Marines spend more money on this project every minute than any hotrod project in total I ever even heard about. Our LevelPro controller was required to pass a voltage surge test that cost us [them] $30,000. [Yes, we passed] Our military customer was especially concerned about my lack of engineering credentials until the Marines liaison pointed out that we were able to resolve a suspension issue that had eluded their team of mechanical engineers for several months.
Although I am not a “degreed engineer” I have access to several individuals in several disciplines. I read a lot of books, I ask a lot of questions, and I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night. [still paying attention?] I have told many customers that I do not know every way there is to build an air suspension, but I do know several years worth of ways NOT to. [that was supposed to be cute...feel free to insert indignant reply here]

Typically when I talk about Air Ride Technologies I use the term “we”. That is because any significant accomplishment is the result of the efforts of more than one person. I use the term “I” today because I want to project to everyone that I am ultimately responsible for my products, manufactured or vended. I have been known to tell employees “It may not be your fault, but it is your responsibility.” That includes me. Especially me.
I know that I’ll have more info to post in the next few days / weeks. I’m sure that there will be many replies and opinions. I ask that you take what you need and let the rest lay. I will attempt the same.

Bret Voelkel
President
Air Ride Technologies, Inc.

vp23271
05-11-2008, 01:57 PM
Bret, Thanks for posting and keeping us in the loop!

I was at the Costa Mesa show and saw the Chevelle running hard! I did not see the spindle failure, but I am very interested to find out what happen. Keep us posted.

Steve1968LS2
05-11-2008, 02:26 PM
I too was at the CM GG show.. in fact Bret took me for a ride in the Chevelle about a half hour before the accident.

The first lab he spun it out.. that was fun.. the next lap he didn't even hit a cone, maybe that's because he wasn't driving my car (just kidding Bret).

The point is that he beats the ever loving snot out of any car he is in. Period. My feeling on the spindle is that stuff breaks, even good stuff. That's why race teams, who run the best parts money can buy, bring spares of everything with them to the race.

I think it says a lot that Bret is willing to stand behind his product in this way. Good post.

Hey, I have a pic of the "incident"... want it? Part of the reason it slid so far is that it was using a cone as a skidplate. lol

class67
05-11-2008, 02:32 PM
Bret, thanks for the info. I think we all appreciate it, as well as your honesty although, I don't think anybody would ever doubt you or your product (just one of those things, I guess). I saw the car after it happened at my friends shop and was wondering how that could have happened myself?

MonzaRacer
05-11-2008, 02:35 PM
Now can ANYONE tell me how Bret Voekel and Air Ride Technologies aren't the number one top of the line air suspension company/owner?
To me this seals any deal on which suspension I would use.
Oh yeah Bret my 78 C10 is coming up on 4 yrs with ART all the way around and still kicking.

Bill Howell
05-11-2008, 04:56 PM
Bret, your honesty and openness on this speaks volumes about your integrity and concern for your customers and products. As you know, I have had Global West/QA1 parts on my goat for about two years/10000 miles. Hopefully, tomorrow we will sit it back down off the rack and for the first time drive it with the new Air Ride suspension on it. I can not wait. Not only has my car always rode like a tank, I have had countless issues with the shocks. After all the autocrosses I have attended, including RTTHs, there was no real choice for my A-body except Air Ride after the disappointments with the other products. I for one have no concern at all over one failed part. I know I will never push my car as hard as I have seen that chevelle pushed so many times. I am sure, knowing you, that you will not rest until the answer is found and problem addressed, but meanwhile, I will be driving the goat down to Year One this week, running the hell out of it this weekend and driving it home. See you and the crew there.:cool:

ProdigyCustoms
05-11-2008, 05:40 PM
Thanks Bret. We sell all Air Ride products with confidence. I know you will get to the bottom of this and whatever the solution, if any, will be implemented.

MrQuick
05-11-2008, 08:39 PM
Automotive parts break all the time. Normal for me to see. I see it daily.

This was a track driven car that was pushed, its expected. I run safety chains and limiter straps just so its not too bad when something does break. It happens. Yes, I do expect it.

Now if this where to happen to a show car that gets your normal sunday cruises after hitting a pot hole on the highway than that would be different.

Get up, brush yourself off and build it better.

67SSDan
05-12-2008, 03:09 AM
See... now that's what I'm talking about. The GOOD vendors will step up.

Now... about those camaro pix. We going to have to wait till after next weekend's unveiling to see some full body shots? LOL

:)

Dan

Bow Tie 67
05-12-2008, 06:59 AM
quote: " I read a lot of books, I ask a lot of questions, and I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night. [still paying attention?] "

Lol

Well written Bret, I'll assume the transition area where the spindle broke was radiused. Looking forward to pics of the broken end that was still attached to the wheel / brake assy.

Matt

ATAK, Inc.
05-12-2008, 08:49 AM
I too am interested from a metallurgical standpoint. It breaking at the step from the inner bearing surface to the seal surface sounds like a possible stress riser from the machining process or possibly something to do with the bearing. Of course this is all speculation without seeing close-up pics of the failure. FWIW, I have been working with metals and material inspection for over 24 years. I have a minor in Metallurgy and lots of experience with common and exotic metals and alloys. I am a CWI (Certified Welding Inspector), and a ASNT Level II in the 5 primary methods(Radiography, Ultasonic, Eddy current, Liquid Penetrant and Magnetic Particle Inspection Methods). Please post some close up pics of the failure area of both pieces.

TonyL
05-12-2008, 08:56 AM
there's a shot of the broken spindle in this month's PHR. I was surprised to see that the actual shaft of the spindle broke off. When I heard about the failure, I assumed the spindle broke somewhere else.

As for what happened, I'm leaning towards any stock diameter spindle will break under the right amount of load. Fact is, the Chevelle was most likely being driven at that load when it failed. I'm glad Bret is being up front about it. It speaks volumes about ART's integrity.

HRBS
05-12-2008, 09:46 AM
Thanks for the informative update Brett and thanks for standing behind your product(s).
But I really want to know how you got Grundy or any other insurance company to cover a "track" incident. :look:

MrQuick
05-12-2008, 10:11 AM
I too am interested from a metallurgical standpoint. It breaking at the step from the inner bearing surface to the seal surface sounds like a possible stress riser from the machining process or possibly something to do with the bearing. Of course this is all speculation without seeing close-up pics of the failure. FWIW, I have been working with metals and material inspection for over 24 years. I have a minor in Metallurgy and lots of experience with common and exotic metals and alloys. I am a CWI (Certified Welding Inspector), and a ASNT Level II in the 5 primary methods(Radiography, Ultasonic, Eddy current, Liquid Penetrant and Magnetic Particle Inspection Methods). Please post some close up pics of the failure area of both pieces. Oh man that was either real bad or very good that you posted that info.....can I have your home phone number and email address....I have some stuff to ask you. LOL
j/k, your wealth of knowledge will come in real handy around here.

Tony, there has been a couple stock failures in that same area hasn't there?

jlmccuan
05-12-2008, 10:23 AM
Brett,

I don't know you and don't currently have any of your products in use, but after reading this, I hope to do both soon.

Jim McCuan

ATAK, Inc.
05-12-2008, 10:26 AM
Oh man that was either real bad or very good that you posted that info.....can I have your home phone number and email address....I have some stuff to ask you. LOL
j/k, your wealth of knowledge will come in real handy around here.

Tony, there has been a couple stock failures in that same area hasn't there?

More than happy to be of help. I have had way too many interesting things happen to me over the years. Over 20 years ago we had an F-4E Phantom eat a Turkey Vulture at 500kts. Needless to say the engine was not the same. A Major with the incident investigation team called me over to inspect the engine. When I got there the core of the engine sat on a stand with ALL of the blades broken off at least 50%. He asked me to tell him where the cracks started on the blades. I looked at the core for a few minutes and replied, "The cracks started at the leading edge and propagated to the trailing edge". He got a bit hot under the collar, called my boss who came over, I showed him the marks on the blades and he agreed with my findings. I just love titanium.
Sorry for hijacking the thread.

BTW, I had a spindle break off on me several years ago, it appeared to be a fatigue fracture, cyclic stresses on a part like this are enormous.

MrQuick, if you ever need anything, just let me know.
Tom

TitoJones
05-12-2008, 10:27 AM
My opinion of the failure has to do with the 1 pc construction and heat treatment of the spindle. I think they are trying to harden the pin by heat treating it, but because it is all 1 pc, it makes the spindle brittle and there fore, prone to failure. If Fatman decided to make it a 2 pc spindle with a press in pin, I think it would extend its life.

Bret- Did you ever run full slicks on the car at some point?

Might want to change the title of the thread too- It's technically Fatman's products that failed, not Air Rides.

Tyler

Damn True
05-12-2008, 10:32 AM
More than happy to be of help. I have had way too many interesting things happen to me over the years. Over 20 years ago we had an F-4E Phantom eat a Turkey Vulture at 500kts. Needless to say the engine was not the same. A Major with the incident investigation team called me over to inspect the engine. When I got there the core of the engine sat on a stand with ALL of the blades broken off at least 50%. He asked me to tell him where the cracks started on the blades. I looked at the core for a few minutes and replied, "The cracks started at the leading edge and propagated to the trailing edge". He got a bit hot under the collar, called my boss who came over, I showed him the marks on the blades and he agreed with my findings. I just love titanium.
Sorry for hijacking the thread.

MrQuick, if you ever need anything, just let me know.
Tom

Hey, you could have told him that the cracks started when the 60lb raptor entered the engine inlet.

bret
05-12-2008, 12:55 PM
I didn't have slicks on the car but did run the BFG KD tires that are stickier than the regular KDW's.
Although it is a Fatman spindle, I feel it becomes mine when I sell it to a customer.
Steve Rupp has a general picture of the failure in PHR this month and has agreed to share it with me for this thread. I have a couple pictures myself and will post them after Brent gets his information posted. To post them before accurate information is available would simply invite more speculation. I can say that the spindle pin broke at the base of the inner wheel bearing, it was not at the balljoint mounts. I had heard of another spindle broken a few months ago [not my customer], but heard that the car had been in an accident previously. I cannot verify any of that yet.
I must say that I am impressed by the positive reaction to this situation. I will keep the info coming as quick as I can, no matter how ugly.
Interesting scenario with the jet engine vs. vulture. Carnage evaluation can be fun. [if its not yours, LOL]
To the customers who are waiting on your spindles...Brent has several dozen sets re-inspected, shot peened and re-heat treated. We are getting them load tested before sending them out. Customers with existing units will be covered before new orders are sent out, but with the quantity of his stock all orders whould be covered quite quickly. I know this is not what you all want to hear but is is information you need. This is the first of many thanks for your patience.

Bret Voelkel
President
Air Ride Technologies, Inc.

fatiger53
05-12-2008, 01:20 PM
Fatman here. I offer the following in the interest of providing factual information regarding our G-Force dropped spindle, and the failure experienced by Airride Technologies on their Chevelle for Goodguys Giveaway 2008. We did experience a failure on that car at the Goodguys event in Cost Mesa. The spindle proper, carrying the wheel bearings, separated from the vertical section of the spindle. This car weighs in excess of 4000 lbs, is powered by a strong big block, and was being driven in the Autocross. The spindle should be able to withstand this use, and we took immediate steps to stop further shipments until we could determine the cause of failure. All unsold units were returned to us to allow testing. Once the cause of failure had been determined, we would be able to make a rational decision as to our next step.

I personally designed this spindle with the drop and improved geometry we wanted to provide. I am trained in Mechanical Engineering, and worked in R&D for Textron Corp before founding Fatman Fab. My specialty in college and at Textron was in Failure Analysis. This is a discipline that allows improvement in products by finding the cause of failures, and better design by that knowledge.

The spindles are a one piece forging using 1045 steel with a 91,000 psi tensile strength and a 73,000 psi yield strength. That alloy is commonly used for spindles, axles, crane lift hooks, and other highly stressed components. Based on a 1.25 inner bearing ID, 1.22 square inches are in shear stress, providing a theoretical section strength of 67,000 pounds, using a shear strength factor at 60 % of tensile strength. That is over 15 times the weight of the car, a generous safety factor. After forging, a heat treat and annealing process is used to add toughness/ ductility to the forging with a final hardness of Rc30 being specified. That heat treatment is used to make the part have improved resistance to fatigue from repeated load/unload stress cycles as seen in parts such as these spindles.
Two production runs have been made since 2006, with each marked differently as is normal procedure in casting and forging work. The spindle that failed on the Airride car was from the first batch, marked A0606.

The manufacturer has been engaged in high strength forgings for many years. They produce crane hooks, earthmoving equipment, and automotive suspension parts. In fact, they have been making other spindles and control arm cross shafts for Fatman’s for over 8 years. Thousands of parts have been supplied, with a zero failure rate. This gave us great confidence in their ability to produce this part. It appears that proper design, material selection, and a proven manufacturer were utilized. Yet, a failure occurred.

Once returned to us, we sent the broken part to an independent Metallurgy lab. It was found that a small crack at the root of the inner bearing area was expanded by fatigue load/unload cycles until critical loss of area under stress occurred, causing the failure. The hardness measured Rc18 rather than the Rc30 specified. The bearing surface had been induction hardened (using an electrically heated ring) to a higher hardness in the interest of preventing bearing wear. An improvement in design was suggested by the lab, and another Engineer, by enlarging the radius at the root of the inner bearing area for greater protection from a stress riser at that area.

My conclusions are that the heat treatment was not properly controlled, and further that the localized induction hardening and cooling may have over annealed the material in the critical area. Any material that is soft enough to move under stress can then work harden and crack. After seeing these results, we determined that the first batch had other units whose Rc hardness level was out of spec, while the entire second batch checked out as OK to specs.

We have changed the process to remove the induction hardening of the bearing area, as the Rc30 overall hardness spec will take care of any expected wear. Final inspection has been intensified from the normal industry practice of spot checking, to checking each and every part. The induction hardening has been eliminated to avoid any possibility of over annealing the forged part. A shot peening process has been added to aid in eliminating stress risers, and an increase in the inner bearing root diameter has been added to the machining specifications.

Now comes the really hard part..what to do about the parts already in service, and in stock. The only truly acceptable failure rate is zero. In the real world, with manmade products, failures still occur. That’s not an excuse, but a reality. At this point, based on thousands of spindles and hundreds of this particular design produced by the same foundry, material, and process, and of units installed and used over 8 years, I feel that the failure of the Airride spindle was an aberration, quite possibly aggravated by a pretty extreme use. Again, a user of the spindle should be able to be confident that it can take that usage.

Further, we have scheduled another lab to do a stress test of a stock GM spindle as a baseline, and compare it to an as produced spindle from the first batch, and a spindle from that same first batch that has been re heat treated and shot peened. We will also test a spindle from the second batch, which has had a zero failure rate. As we receive later batches, we shall continue this process of using destructive testing to ensure the integrity of the product.

We will certainly be willing to exchange the spindles from the first batch, marked A0606, for those in the second zero failure batch, for any users who feel this will ease their mind. If they prefer, we will accept returns for refund.

On a personal level, I honestly wish there was a way to absolutely guarantee that any product made or sold by us will never fail. Any responsible manufacturer, builder, or personal hot rodder will feel the same way. The hard truth is that zero defects are an absolute goal, not an absolute reality. When we cannot be perfect, we will be responsible. We will continue to stand behind our products, and to work with our customers to assist in repairing any damage that might occur, as we have for the last 27 years we have been in business.

Thanks for allowing me to provide information regarding this unfortunate occurance. Should anyone wish to discuss this issue in person, please feel free to call me at Fatman Fab, (704) 545-0369, [email protected] or see me at a show.

ATAK, Inc.
05-12-2008, 01:28 PM
My hat's off to you, that is integrity. I currently do not have any of your products but would not hesitate to buy anything.
In regards to the Vulture vs F-4E, I have many stories of interesting events with the USAF, but better told in the appropriate forum.
Once again Bret, a big :twothumbs to you and your company.

WEAVER
05-12-2008, 03:08 PM
Your a class act,nice to know there are people who make parts that are tested the way yours are,Sometimes parts break that is why race teams take a whole bunch of spares.I'm still buying your products.We work on a lot of cars that have air ride installed and say they will buy again.

406 Q-ship
05-12-2008, 03:36 PM
Bret; Let me say this up front I'm not a fan of air bags for a handling type of car, with that said I commend you on your honesty and forthrightness. There are few companies today that would come out and say that they had a problem with their own vehicle and what has been found up to date, you deserve a big applause for this action. If any of you are in the market for this type of suspension system this is the man and company to talk too, he is honest ( a rare commodity in todays market).

Returning to the failure, what about the bearing inner race where it contacts the spindle, could you have a point where the sharp edge of the inner race caused a stress riser? This might be more of a cycle life issue over a catastrophic failure with how the race rides on the spindle spud. If the heat treat on the inner race were harder than the heat treat of the spud then the race under load or movement could displace metal giving you the dereaded stress riser. Just a thought.

Boulder69
05-12-2008, 03:46 PM
Hey, you could have told him that the cracks started when the 60lb raptor entered the engine inlet.

Turkey vultures aren't technically raptors and a big one weighs in around 6 pounds. Still really big birds when they fly into engines.

Back to the regularly scheduled program....

Gordz32
05-12-2008, 04:49 PM
Well Said Bret! I must say that you guys continue to impress me everytime I talk to someone from the company or recieve more products. Your products are top notch, and your customer service is quite possibly the best I've ever experienced.

Larry Callahan
05-12-2008, 06:11 PM
Above you will find posts from a couple of threads I merged into one. I am sorry but a few might be out of order. I have not been able to figure out how to move an individual post inside a thread.

Also, there were a few of the first posts from the new Air Ride Camaro thread I moved to the link below. I just can't figure out how to put them all together in one long thread in order.

https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43264

bret
05-13-2008, 03:28 AM
Returning to the failure, what about the bearing inner race where it contacts the spindle, could you have a point where the sharp edge of the inner race caused a stress riser? This might be more of a cycle life issue over a catastrophic failure with how the race rides on the spindle spud. If the heat treat on the inner race were harder than the heat treat of the spud then the race under load or movement could displace metal giving you the dereaded stress riser. Just a thought.

These kinds of possibilities are why I say that I simply do not know at this point. This is a very plausible scenario, and one that I immediately gravitated towards because it would have indicated a true anomoly...a freak, if you will. But I saw no indication of any abnormality with the bearing or race.
Not only am I impressed and humbled by the overall support we have gotton about this, I am impressed with the quality of thought and analisys directed towards this problem. As with most difficult problems, I think we will find a stack of small problems that have added up to failure. More later.

CarlC
05-13-2008, 06:17 PM
But I saw no indication of any abnormality with the bearing or race.

There will be no indication of insufficient cornerform radius on the bearing rings. The only time it MIGHT show up on the rings is if the cornerform was too big and did not allow them to properly seat against the spindle shoulder.

Do you have an Rmin and Rmax specified for the cornerform radius? Unless both are specified it is left up to the manufacturer to what this Rmin value will be. Given that it is easier to use a simple turning tool with a small-radius cutting face vs. a true Rmax tool, often the manufacturer without having the specification or an inspection process to verify proper sizing is left to do what is the cheapest.

The Rmin value must be chosen by the design engineer to maximize strength within the confines of manufacturing capability. However, cornerform radii is an easy thing to do vs. keeping superprecision tolerances.

Since it was not mentioned in the other posts my concern would be that there may be spindles with an insufficient cornerform radius. Even if the spindle was properly heat treated the possibility of catastrophic failure significantly increases when a high stress-riser is introduced. Crack initiation and propagation can quickly follow even in low-load and low-cyclic conditions.

I can't tell you how many shafts I've seen, and had the displeasure to inform the customer, that this type of situation could have been easily avoided.

slowcamaro
05-13-2008, 06:58 PM
I can't tell you how many shafts I've seen, and had the displeasure to inform the customer, that this type of situation could have been easily avoided.

QOTY? Sig material for sure...

newbaa
05-13-2008, 09:04 PM
:postpics: lol.

That is very impressive. Especially the fact that you are willing to replace ones that somebody might have bought second-hand. That's somebody who's willing to stand behind their product... Someone who want's to know they are producing the best damn product out there and they're proud of it.

It's a long ways off, but when the time comes, you better believe i will be running Air Ride Technologies stuff on my '70 Chevelle. :cheers::hail:

AccuAir
05-13-2008, 09:22 PM
Way to go Bret and Brent! As a relatively young manufacturer in the industry (29), you guys have set a very valuable example on how to properly handle a "delicate" situation like this. You have also set a precedent toward providing higher quality products through real world punishment in front of everyone (even the magazine editors =). I think that if every aftermarket manufacturer were to publicly punish their products and display it for the world to see, the results would be ugly. Infact, if the big 3 auto manufacturers made their failures as public as you guys do, we may all be riding bicycles right now.

Having an ME degree, I was immediately thirsty for details when I heard of the failure. I was impressed to read this thread and see Brent providing some real failure analysis backed by real numbers. I think that anyone who owns these spindles should feel better knowing that this wasn't a random manufacturing defect that could pop up on some percentage of parts. This was a general design/manufacturing issue that has been 100% resolved.

On a general note, a 63 year old friend of mine has one of the nicest '32 Roadsters on the planet (if you're into that kinda thing =) He built the car himself and made a permanent compartment in the trunk with mounting provisions for spare parts (distributor, carb parts, hand tools etc). Obviosly, he has been left on the side of the road by each of these parts at some point in his life. I would like to think that we are creating a new era for aftermarket parts, where reliability is paramount. Forums like these with threads like these make me think that we are headed in the right direction.

6'9"Witha69
05-14-2008, 09:15 AM
I can't tell you how many shafts I've seen, and had the displeasure to inform the customer, that this type of situation could have been easily avoided.I can't believe you actually wrote that! :lol:

Damn True
05-14-2008, 10:22 AM
These kinds of possibilities are why I say that I simply do not know at this point. This is a very plausible scenario, and one that I immediately gravitated towards because it would have indicated a true anomoly...a freak, if you will. But I saw no indication of any abnormality with the bearing or race.
Not only am I impressed and humbled by the overall support we have gotton about this, I am impressed with the quality of thought and analisys directed towards this problem. As with most difficult problems, I think we will find a stack of small problems that have added up to failure. More later.

Just out of curiosity, is this your first and only spindle failure?

How about Fatman spindles not sold through ART?

CarlC
05-14-2008, 02:30 PM
Yeah yeah yeah, yuck it up.... My industry has way too many innuendos.

EeeDeeEye
05-15-2008, 05:27 AM
How refreshing to see this type of response from a vendor/manufacturer! The first time any product fails, it is an "incident" and normally discounted or ignored. Afterwards, additional failures of the same nature should be considered a "trend" and examined immediately... but often continue to be discounted or ignored. The fact that Bret and ART pulled all stock from the shelf after just an "incident" speaks volumes about the individual and the company! They chose to take the path in which common sense and public safety win out over the almighty dollar... quite remarkable in this day & age.

I don't own any ART products, but I was considering using them in my project. After reading this thread and ART's response, I would have no qualms about using any of their products. Thank you for reminding me that there are still companies that desire to build quality products AND stand behind their products during success and failure!

BTW, sorry for the lengthy first post!

darren@ridetech
05-15-2008, 09:10 AM
Just out of curiosity, is this your first and only spindle failure?

How about Fatman spindles not sold through ART?

I do know for a fact that this is the only spindle that we have had fail. I'm not sure if Fatman's has had any.

bret
05-19-2008, 10:53 AM
Hello all! While I have been away from the office for the debut of the Velocity Camaro at Road Atlanta this past weekend, We have made at least some progress of the spindle issue. Brent has a stress test scheduled for this thursday May 22 to test 4 spindles. We will test a first production run part [from the lot where the failed spindle came from], a second run part [where there were no heat treat problems], a first production run part that has been re-heat treated and shotpeened, and a stock spindle. I do not yet have the technical parametes of the actual test. We will have those details and pictures of the test after completion. More info to come.
As far as other broken spindles, I do not know of any other broken parts. If there is anyone who has a broken spindle, or even knows about a broken spindle, PLEASE let me know [[email protected]] I do not care if it came from me, Fatman, or the swapmeet...I need to have this information. If you are squeamish about posting publicly, just send me a personal email.
As a side note...I took Velocity to the Year One event at Road Atlanta this weekend and run several 26.6-26.9 autocross times on BFG KDW tires [stock 08 Vettes were running 27.0's]. I also ran the big track at over 125mph.[fun squared, BTW] Then I drove the car 400 miles home [mostly in the rain], all on the second run of a Fatman spindle. We will inspect that spindle [as well as the rest of the car] this week for any problems.
Check out ridetech.com for more Velocity info. Thanks!

LONE*STAR
05-19-2008, 11:33 AM
I have to raise my hand in the class, to confess to coming from the Minitruckin crowd and I remember actually saying that, and I remember as layin frame became popular people didn't want ART comp. But you sir with these street challenge kits have changed a hole lot of people's opinion on what exactly a Air suspension equip vehicle is capable of....wait....Let me restate that a ART equipped vehicle is capable on the street, track...or any where else.

I will do a street challenge kit on my next build.

JEFFTATE
05-19-2008, 12:05 PM
I'm here to testify that the Velocity Camaro looked good on the track !
No broken parts !

fatiger53
05-27-2008, 06:13 AM
Fatman here. We did do an independent tensile test of the GForce spindle, and have written the report based on that. As it is too large to post directly here, please go to the following to see the entire report. And thanks for a place to expose problems, as well the solutions!

derekf
05-27-2008, 06:28 AM
Images don't seem to come through at work, so that might be it, but I'm not seeing a link, Fatman.

70bird
05-27-2008, 07:12 AM
No link here either

Larry Callahan
05-27-2008, 07:24 AM
I just uploaded the word doc. Please see the link in his post above.

bret
05-27-2008, 09:47 AM
After reading the stress test from Brent at Fatmans I would like to offer the following observations:


The first production run of spindles, while performing adequately in all but the most extreme environment, suffer the combined issues of a substandard heat treatment process and the lack of an adequate root radius at the base of the spindle pin. The soft heat treatment allowed the spindle pin to bend in extreme use. The continued extreme use [and bending] over a period of time allowed the area to work harden and become brittle. After becoming brittle, the inadequate radius at the base of the spindle pin allowed a crack to form and expand into failure. The absence of either problem would have likely prevented failure, even in extreme use.
Re-heat treatment and shotpeening of this run of spindles has improved the performance of this unit to the point that the ball joint nut is now the weakest link in this assembly. The failure point of over 20,000lbs is 5x the entire weight of the car. This safety factor is far above most automotive and aircraft standards. The absence of any flex at the spindle pin will avoid the subsequent work hardening, cracking and failure process.
Future production runs of this spindle will have an upgraded heat treatment and inspection process, as well as an increased radius at the base of the spindle pin to increase performance even more. We will publish the test data for these units when available.To make everyone feel better, including myself, I am going to get all of these 1st run spindles back for inspection, re-heat treating, shotpeening, or replacement. I have to assume that all of our customers will corner their 4000lb car on sticky tires. Even if they don’t, I want to look at these spindles to see if there are any more unseen problems. I am going to send all of my customers a letter explaining the problem and offering to exchange their spindles or refund their money. This letter should go out at least by the end of this week. I will issue a call tag to get them picked up and when I can track their shipment I will send their replacement spindles. If you have a set of these spindles, please email me [[email protected]] with your contact info. We have several sets that have been inspected, and now tested, to make these exchanges, so your down time should be minimal. Replacements will be fulfilled before new orders are filled. If you know someone who has these units that doesn’t read these forums please forward this info to them. Between this forum and our outgoing letters we should have everyone covered. It is not important to me if you bought them from Air Ride Technologies, Fatmans, or the swapmeet…we will take care of them.

It ain't fun, for neither me or Fatman, but it is neccessary. We'll get to fun later.

Bret Voelkel
President
Air ride Technologies, Inc.

Steve1968LS2
05-27-2008, 09:58 AM
Way to stand behind your product Brent and Bret... Many companies wouldn't have done this after one failure and would have chocked it up to "an anomoly".

Sucked that it happened but if this prevents a failure at a more dangerous time (ie, mountain road) then it was actually a blessing in disguise.

Again, kudos for being stand-up guys about this and for disclosing so much information.

syborg tt
05-28-2008, 06:52 AM
I have to raise my hand in the class, to confess to coming from the Minitruckin crowd and I remember actually saying that, and I remember as layin frame became popular people didn't want ART comp.

Being that I'm from the mini-truck crowd and the fact that I am on 5 different mini-truck boards. I heard it over and over "is that truck going to lay frame"? My answer is always the same - Nope.....

Trust me it's a tough crowd, they all want to lay frame. However I am failry certian that there is enough people watching the build of my truck ( over 500,000 views so far ) that they are starting to actually learn that while dragging you frame migh sound cool it not as much fun as driving a safe and reliable vehicle.

With that being said.

When we looked at the suspension for my project mini-truck we didn't have to look any further then Air Ride Technology.
(the mini-truck if for Kenny )

To date each and every employee that we've had the pleasure to worked with at ART is just like Bret. They are car guy through and through and they went out of there way to help us with this project.

When we were at Good Guys Indy 2007, I finally got to meet Jeremy and he showed me there new Level-Pro system and I was so impressed, that we upgraded to this kit. These guys make great products.

I'm looking forward to working with them on the next project and all future projects.

On a side note my best friend grew up in Jasper, Indiana the home of Air Ride. He has told me storys about Bret and some of the things that that he's done for people and not only does he run a great company but he is conducts his personal life on the same level.

ps I've never met Bret but i am certain that I will one day an look forward to shaking his hand and telling him "Job well Done".

ProBell
06-02-2008, 06:32 PM
Thanks for posting the test data. Here is my question. The test was on pushing the spindle straight up. The 4 stock spindles we found cracked were all cracked on the top side of the pin. Not on the bottom as we expected. Is it possible to put a greater force on the spindle turning the car than straight down in a compression state. When you are turning the car the outside wheel is trying to fold under the car, their for trying to pull the pin down. The cracks we found suggest this is when are spindles saw the most load or flex. For example, I am thinking of a bucket of rocks on a rope. If you spin the rope around over your head it weighs more than just hanging their. I have broke one stock hub and cracked some spindles so I am just trying to think this through. What do you think? Thanks Randy

Damn True
06-02-2008, 07:08 PM
Throw in gyroscopic procession and things get really interesting.

bret
06-03-2008, 05:30 AM
Thanks for posting the test data. Here is my question. The test was on pushing the spindle straight up. The 4 stock spindles we found cracked were all cracked on the top side of the pin. Not on the bottom as we expected. Is it possible to put a greater force on the spindle turning the car than straight down in a compression state. When you are turning the car the outside wheel is trying to fold under the car, their for trying to pull the pin down. The cracks we found suggest this is when are spindles saw the most load or flex. For example, I am thinking of a bucket of rocks on a rope. If you spin the rope around over your head it weighs more than just hanging their. I have broke one stock hub and cracked some spindles so I am just trying to think this through. What do you think? Thanks Randy

I just want to clarify...you are talking about stock spindles, right? Or at least NOT one of our ridetech/Fatman tall spindles? [insert heart attack here!]

One possibility is that the oem early Camaro/Chevelle spindle/suspension geometry puts the tire in a positive camber position on compression. It is feasible that the force at that point is more lateral on the bottom of the tire than compressive through the tire. That may impose the force in the direction necessary to crack the spindle on the top of the pin. Here is a link to an article on air suspension that has a good side-by-side photo comparison between an OEM spindle and a tall spindle vehicle in a hard corner. Look at the sidewall of the tire in each photo.
http://www.ridetech.com/files_AR/magarticles/AirtobeDif.pdf

It is an interesting question...I will talk to some people who may have relevant opinions on this. Thanks for the input!

ProBell
06-03-2008, 10:02 AM
Thanks for the reply Bret. Yes they were STOCK spindles and hubs not one of yours. My front suspension has been reworked to get the proper geometry and I am running the car at the track on slicks now. The picture is on street tires. Thanks Randy

68sixspeed
06-03-2008, 12:42 PM
no stress on it at all... for those not following or aware of the the stock spindle issues for A/F bodies-- https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22020

bret
06-03-2008, 12:42 PM
Cool car. It makes a big difference getting that tire to lean in instead of out through the corner.
This will give me something to talk about with Gartshore on the Power Tour next week. Thanks!

hotrdblder
06-03-2008, 02:07 PM
bret if you look at vinnys pic form the autocross, he has your strong arms in the front with ats spindle and he has no neg camber gain, which would then bring to life what these guys are talking about. maybe some testing on the pin, in that direction should be done?
great way to step up and take some heat, then give back tech data for all of us to take in.
see ya in nashville

Steve Chryssos
06-03-2008, 02:11 PM
bret if you look at vinnys pic form the autocross, he has your strong arms in the front with ats spindle and he has no neg camber gain, which would then bring to life what these guys are talking about. maybe some testing on the pin, in that direction should be done?
great way to step up and take some heat, then give back tech data for all of us to take in.
see ya in nashville

Maybe so, but having watched Velocity at Year One, the positive camber issue is is specific to our ATS spindle/Strong Arm combo. Also the broken spindle was on a Chevelle. That doesn't discount the value of testing in the other direction, but if you look at pix of Velocity, the tire is pretty much flat when the car is laid over.