Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 37

    Thread: 17's or 18's

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      RI
      Posts
      746
      Country Flag: United States

      17's or 18's

      Hi I'm fairly new here, I have a 70 lemans that I'm going to be getting 17's or 18's in a month or two. I have a 355 sb with 450hp 450ft/lb a th350 and 3.55 posi. Tires now are 225/70/14 26.6" tall with cragars, i was thinking 17x8 and 9.5 with 285/40 255/45 torq thrust or 18x8 and 10 with 255/45 and 295/45 to fill the wheels wells better. Question is will I notice a difference in acceleration going to the 17's? how about the 18's? I know the 18's will change the gear ratio but will the weight change the acceleration? The cragars weigh 21lb and tires weigh 24lb. The tt2's weigh 23lb + 24lb for 17's and tires are 27lb + 29lb. For 18's they are 24lb + 25lb and tires are 27lb + 31lb. I just want the car to look good and have little effect on performance from the larger dia wheels. I'm open to idea's for different sizes. Heres a pic of the car now.


      http://www.t-mobilepictures.com/phot...6gufc111vk1qrl
      Thanks for the help. I cant sleep at night thinking about what to get.

      Frank M
      1970 lemans sport
      2005 srt-10 ram
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SER1gBLn2N0


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Illinois
      Posts
      186
      http://forums.performanceyears.com/f...d.php?t=394543

      17" look good for your wheel well / Lighter, cheaper tires, more tires available.

      18" Look Great , extra wow factor, tires $$$ and sizes limited.
      A link to some pictures of my Firebirds and other toys

      http://community.webshots.com/user/ponchoman69

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Colorado
      Posts
      94
      I would go 17, I put 18's on the rear of my car and tires are really expensive. I do wish I had gone 17's all around
      68 Camaro
      LS2 6speed
      Complete Hotchkis front and rear suspension, Global west SFC, 3rd gen steering box, C5 front rear discs w/ 4th gen booster and MC. 8.5" posi rearend with 30 Spline 12 bolt axles.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      2,413
      If you can spare the Jack go with the 18s. Keep a generouse sidewall. The only 295 45 18 I could find is a Goodyear eagle GS for 225 each.
      Nothing says "I built this" better than tool marks and dykem blue..

      Follow my 3 link build. https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=61592

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      RI
      Posts
      746
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for the info i was looking into nitto tires they have those sizes. So you guys think 17's with a 255/45 and 285/40 which is 26" tall will fill the wheel well good? I'd rather get 17's due to cost lighter and since i don't need the extra clearence for brakes. Im more into performance than looks but i like to look good doing it.My rear tires only last half the summer lol.
      Here's a pic of how the car sits since the frame off a month ago,it sits level front to back, i also need to put the chrome trim around the wheel well on. I love that lemans in that link beebe, i found that car online a couple months ago very nice.
      Frank M
      1970 lemans sport
      2005 srt-10 ram
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SER1gBLn2N0

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Posts
      261
      Go with the 18" combo that you mentioned earlier. With the proper back spacing the combo will fill up the wheel wells better than the 17" combo.
      If your not going to use big brakes that won't fill the wheels back ground just find a design that'll be less revealing ie... harder to see the rotors and calipers. Most importantly do what you like, go about it safely, and take your time with your choices it'll pay in the long run.
      Gerald

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jul 2002
      Location
      Muskegon, MI
      Posts
      4,494
      18" for sure. I went thru this 17", 18" battle for at least 2 years trying to get what I could afford. I am glad I went the 18" route and I would run 18" wheels on every car. I personally think they look soo much better than 17". Especially if you really nail the stance. They also seem to perform extremely well at the track. I dont mean dragstrip either.
      Adam_______Offical Car Name "ILLUSION"
      383 Stroker, Stock cast heads, T-56 tranny, 4.11 gears, 2002 T/A dash, 4th gen interior including seatbelts, power lumbar seats, 18" Budnik Wheels, Hydraboost, QA1 shocks, DC Controller, Power steering conversion, fuel cell, unique exhaust set up........
      ILLUSION Website-----------Old Website--------------My Car on Lateral-g.net----------- Need something designed?-AdFabDesign

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      RI
      Posts
      746
      Country Flag: United States
      I guess now 18's might be better. I'm def getting torq thrust, I like them alot and they aren't to expensive. I like the look of the tire size on your car CAMAROBOY, now I'm confused on what to get. I could go with the size's mentioned earlier or a 275-285/40 18 on the back with 245/45 front which wont really change my gearing.Hmmm talk about having problems. Does anyone think bigger rims will effect straightline performance on the street enough for me to fell it? Sorry for so many questions its just i dont want to waste my money on a set of wheels and not be happy also my girlfriend getting sick of me asking her about rims. Thanks guys!
      Frank M
      1970 lemans sport
      2005 srt-10 ram
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SER1gBLn2N0

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Long Island, NY
      Posts
      11,320
      Country Flag: United States
      I would go with 18s on an A-body.



      I think Andrew is running 295/45/18s in the rear, too.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Northern Indiana
      Posts
      588
      Go with the 18's...You were talking the TT's not be too expensive, but when you get into 18" wheels they are all kind of salty. Look at the CL205's. They are nice.
      "Champagne taste on a beer pocket book."

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      Georgetown,TX
      Posts
      2,557
      Quote Originally Posted by BEEBE
      17" look good for your wheel well / Lighter, cheaper tires, more tires available.
      18" Look Great , extra wow factor, tires $$$ and sizes limited.
      I think if you check that you will find more tire sizes available in 18's.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jul 2002
      Location
      Muskegon, MI
      Posts
      4,494
      Well you should be able to sleep a little better now knowing that the majority vote goes for 18". You wont be disappointed at all with 18's and you will thank us for sure when you get them bolted up for the first time. :3gears:
      Adam_______Offical Car Name "ILLUSION"
      383 Stroker, Stock cast heads, T-56 tranny, 4.11 gears, 2002 T/A dash, 4th gen interior including seatbelts, power lumbar seats, 18" Budnik Wheels, Hydraboost, QA1 shocks, DC Controller, Power steering conversion, fuel cell, unique exhaust set up........
      ILLUSION Website-----------Old Website--------------My Car on Lateral-g.net----------- Need something designed?-AdFabDesign

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      RI
      Posts
      746
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for all the responses! I guess I'm going with 18's. Now i just have to decide on tire sizes. I found a dealer on line that can get me 18x8 and 18x10 torq thrust with nitto 245/45 and 275/40 mounted balanced shipped for like $2100. I thought that sounded pretty good. Should i go with the taller 295/45? sorry to be so repetitive. I still won't be able to sleep till I get them but everyone I know will be glad i finally pick a rim and rim size lol.
      Frank M
      1970 lemans sport
      2005 srt-10 ram
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SER1gBLn2N0

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jul 2002
      Location
      Muskegon, MI
      Posts
      4,494
      $2100 sounds like a great deal for 18" wheels and tires all fully mounted, balanced, and shipped. I think it would be hard to beat that.
      Adam_______Offical Car Name "ILLUSION"
      383 Stroker, Stock cast heads, T-56 tranny, 4.11 gears, 2002 T/A dash, 4th gen interior including seatbelts, power lumbar seats, 18" Budnik Wheels, Hydraboost, QA1 shocks, DC Controller, Power steering conversion, fuel cell, unique exhaust set up........
      ILLUSION Website-----------Old Website--------------My Car on Lateral-g.net----------- Need something designed?-AdFabDesign

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      RI
      Posts
      746
      Country Flag: United States
      Thats what i thought CAMAROBOY. I guess ill pick my tire size when i get the car back on the road (about a week or two) To see how i like the new 3.55 (used to be 3.08) If i feel like i need less gear i'll get the 295/45. If i like them i'll get the 275/40. Then maybe i can take it out on a track, just have to find the closes one to R.I.
      Frank M
      1970 lemans sport
      2005 srt-10 ram
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SER1gBLn2N0

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Posts
      478
      I have 295/45/18s on the back of my 67 GTO and they are bad@ss! I wouldn't have it any other way. They are on a 18x9.5 wheel and they don't pooch very much at all. They are very muscle car looking, with the meaty sidewall. The key is dropping the car down over them about 3". It is a mean look.

      They are Nitto 555s and they were like 200/ea from discount tire.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jul 2002
      Location
      Muskegon, MI
      Posts
      4,494
      Quote Originally Posted by gearbanger
      I have 295/45/18s on the back of my 67 GTO and they are bad@ss! I wouldn't have it any other way. They are on a 18x9.5 wheel and they don't pooch very much at all. They are very muscle car looking, with the meaty sidewall. The key is dropping the car down over them about 3". It is a mean look.

      They are Nitto 555s and they were like 200/ea from discount tire.
      You cant get him all excited without posting pics of your car. Frank, I would say if you can fit the 295 then go for it for sure. Just skip the 275. Nittos are awesome. Im very happy with my nittos. Stick like glue on a track!
      Adam_______Offical Car Name "ILLUSION"
      383 Stroker, Stock cast heads, T-56 tranny, 4.11 gears, 2002 T/A dash, 4th gen interior including seatbelts, power lumbar seats, 18" Budnik Wheels, Hydraboost, QA1 shocks, DC Controller, Power steering conversion, fuel cell, unique exhaust set up........
      ILLUSION Website-----------Old Website--------------My Car on Lateral-g.net----------- Need something designed?-AdFabDesign

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      1,464
      Country Flag: United States
      Hey,

      If you are interested I have a set of 18x8 front 245 40 and 18x9 rear 275 40 all set and ready to go. They are from BUDNICK and they are the FAMOSA FAT LIP POLISHED. I have an ad in the FOR SALE section. ALL MOUNTED AND BALANCED AND READY TO PUT ON for 2600 without the wait. Just a thought if your interested let me know 978-479-8319.

      I KNOW CAMAROBOY LIKES THEM HE has the same setup!!! BTW I am about 20 minutes NORTH OF BOSTON so it is a short ride to come and get em!!

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      RI
      Posts
      746
      Country Flag: United States
      So everyone thinks 295/45 will look awesome, and will go with my combo. Now i have to figure out how much B.S. prob around 5.5-5.75. but i'll measure first. I'd love to see pics of that 67 gto. toofun i'd be intrested if the front tires were 245/45's
      Frank M
      1970 lemans sport
      2005 srt-10 ram
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SER1gBLn2N0

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jul 2002
      Location
      Muskegon, MI
      Posts
      4,494
      Frank,
      You should check out toofuns set up he is selling. He is also very close to you too. You should at least check those out first. Mabey he will even knock a few bucks off since he wont have to ship them to you.
      Adam_______Offical Car Name "ILLUSION"
      383 Stroker, Stock cast heads, T-56 tranny, 4.11 gears, 2002 T/A dash, 4th gen interior including seatbelts, power lumbar seats, 18" Budnik Wheels, Hydraboost, QA1 shocks, DC Controller, Power steering conversion, fuel cell, unique exhaust set up........
      ILLUSION Website-----------Old Website--------------My Car on Lateral-g.net----------- Need something designed?-AdFabDesign

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com