gui67
10-28-2025, 06:23 AM
Hi,
I am running a 4L80E in my 67 Camaro since around 10 years. I have an Autometer electronic speedometer for the moment.
But I want to go back with the original speedometer. (For stock look)
First i wanter to modify it in order to be compatible with the transmission, but I always have problems with the odometer.
So there are 2 solutions left:
A modified tail housing with a cable outlet.
And speedbox
Both are approximately the same price, around 400$ without the cable.
What are the advantages and drawbacks of borh solutions?
Speedbox would be more versatile if i once change the tire size or rear end ratio.
Is it noisy? (If i remember comments about older cable x, it was rather noisy and not so precise)
Did you have the opportunity to use one of these solutions or maybe both? What are your advices, preference, comments?
How do they compare in term of noise(certainly the engine will be noisier), of precision, reaction, reliability...
Thanks in advance for your help
Guillaume
I am running a 4L80E in my 67 Camaro since around 10 years. I have an Autometer electronic speedometer for the moment.
But I want to go back with the original speedometer. (For stock look)
First i wanter to modify it in order to be compatible with the transmission, but I always have problems with the odometer.
So there are 2 solutions left:
A modified tail housing with a cable outlet.
And speedbox
Both are approximately the same price, around 400$ without the cable.
What are the advantages and drawbacks of borh solutions?
Speedbox would be more versatile if i once change the tire size or rear end ratio.
Is it noisy? (If i remember comments about older cable x, it was rather noisy and not so precise)
Did you have the opportunity to use one of these solutions or maybe both? What are your advices, preference, comments?
How do they compare in term of noise(certainly the engine will be noisier), of precision, reaction, reliability...
Thanks in advance for your help
Guillaume