PDA

View Full Version : 200-r4 Vs. 700-R4 Which One?



joehammbone
12-10-2005, 09:24 PM
Which trans would be better for my application. I have a 68 camaro convertible with a 350\325Hp and A TH-350. I just sold the 350 tranny and want to install an overdrive. Strength and gas mileage are my main concerns. I'm not going to do any drag racing but I do like to show off...I'm sure you know what I mean... I have found deals on 200-r4 for 1K with converter and are dyno tested and rated at 450 hp. Same thing on the 700-R4 but they run $1200. I just don't know which is better. Oh and would I need any conversion kit via i have no computer in the car (obviously :hammer: 1968) Any help would be so much appreciated. Thanks

Pro-Tour Heavy Chevy
12-10-2005, 10:22 PM
The 200-4r is the same length as the th-350, so you won't have to shorten the driveshaft and that's one less expense,You will have to move the crossmember back though. Also the gear spread is better,the 200 is lighter and smaller than the 700-R4 and its suppose to be more efficent than the 700. 200-4R's in a OE configuration
(exc. Grand-Nats) are not all that great, but when there built they can easily outperform the 700-R4. The 700-R4's are not a bad trans, but for the DIY'er the 200-4R is a lot easier.IMO the 200-4R will probably fit better
in your Camaro Convertible than the 700 considering the extra bracing and the smaller tunnel than that of an A-body.

JMarsa
12-11-2005, 06:59 AM
Gor for the 200 as well. Easier swap, plus you can build them up if you need. Just make sure you get the TV cable right. There are kit and brackets available. I found a Grand National (has the good stuff inside) on Ebay locally for $50. Worth the price to go through it.

--JMarsa

rocketrod
12-11-2005, 08:20 AM
Definitely 2004R, as previously posted much easier swap.

Good information on strengthening a 2004R
http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31365

http://www.turbobuicks.com

joehammbone
12-11-2005, 10:12 AM
Thanks guys. So it looks as though the 200r4 will save me a few bucks and be an easier install. Can I use the TV Cable from the TH-350? or do I need a different one. I also like that the 200 is smaller. The floor was just replaced in my car and I swear that the new tunnel is smaller. I guess it just hasn't be massaged by a few broken driveshafts...Well I am 95% going with the 200-r4 unless convinced otherwis. Thanks for the input guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

6'9"Witha69
12-11-2005, 01:21 PM
Go for the 200. Take it from someone who has broken many a "built" 700. I think the only thing built means in a 700 is that it hurts more (in the pocketbook) when you toss it away. I have lunched 6 in the last 5 years. One only lasted 600 miles and the place who built it adjusted it.

No the 350 TV will not work.

And make sure you adjust the TV!!!!!!!

Northern Goat
12-12-2005, 06:52 AM
FWIW, Had a built 200 in a 69 GTO. 4000 lbs. and had that tranny in the car until we broke into the 11's. Ran a season in the high 11's with it, the only reason we took it out was precautionary and it still works fine in my buddy's convertible.
If it held up to that abuse it should be good for you. I have one in my street driven 65 GTO.

chicane67
12-12-2005, 08:35 PM
200 gets my vote.

cw67
12-14-2005, 04:00 PM
I bought mine from Bowtie Overdrives. They have a good TV cable setup also.

Chris

Firehawkslp
01-08-2006, 09:16 PM
advantages; the 2004r doesn't have the forced 4th to 3rd down shift at full throttle the 700r4 has. This happens at about 3/4 throttle and no the the valves variouse co. sell do not eliminate this, just delay it.
Most have a universal bell bolt pattern i.e. BOP & Chevy. overall length is the same as the th350 but the trans mounting location is close to th400. The gear spead between shift is less. This means you don't fall a cliff going from 1st to 2nd. It is samller, lighter and has less rotating inertia, all of which is good for acceleration and milage.
Can you guess whats going in my project.

rocketrod
01-08-2006, 11:01 PM
Let me guess 2004R. Are you going to build the trans yourself? If so, contact Chris at http://www.ckperformance.com and purchase a copy of his book on Rebuilding and Modifying 2004Rs. If not, you may want to contact "Brian" on www.turbobuick.com He has a very good reputation for building 2004Rs at very reasonable prices? Here is a link to a couple 2004Rs he has for sale now.

http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/showthread.php?t=173945&highlight=2004r

jumpmaster
01-17-2006, 01:19 PM
Hell...I was going to try a 700R4 outta an old 92 camaro I have, but it sounds like I'd be better off with the 200. I'm a newb to this stuff. I hate to ask this, I'm sure it sounds dumb...what is the TV cable?

6'9"Witha69
01-17-2006, 03:18 PM
Throttle Valve.
It controls fluid pressure in the tranny according to throttle position.

GetMore
01-17-2006, 04:37 PM
jumpmaster, there is a lot of debate over using the 200-4R or the 700-R4. It's kind of like the motor oil arguments. I think in most cases the 200 is a better choice, but if you've got a 700 available then I don't think you'd go wrong using it.

As for the TV question: The TH-350 has a downshift cable, where the TH200-4R and TH700-R4 use TV cables. 6'9" has it right-the TV cable controls fluid pressure. If it is adjusted wrong you will burn out the tranny.

jumpmaster
01-18-2006, 10:23 AM
Thanks. I was feeling pretty dumb. I was curious why a television cable would hook up to a transmission?? Just kidding. Thanks guys

jumpmaster
01-20-2006, 02:53 PM
Side note...how much is a 200R4 worth?

I saw one on ebay for $100 out of an '87 monte carlo. Shoipping was about $100 too. So, my question is if my junkyards dont have a 200r4 would a used one be worth $150 to $300?

rocketrod
01-20-2006, 03:50 PM
Depends on the transmission model and condition. Assuming it needs to be rebuild a CZ coded 2004R, found in 86-87 Monte Carlos SS's is worth about $250, while the BF coded trans out of the Buick Grand Nationals go between $350-$500. Baically what makes these cores (CQ, CZ, BF and a few others) desirable is the valve bodies (VB) and govenors, which determine you shift points at WOT when in drive. Not saying the other VBs can't be modified, but it does take some expertise.

68RallySport
01-20-2006, 04:57 PM
I have the stock 200r built up by PTS in turbo trans am that puts a out ALOT of torque. Pts has a lot of good info on there site http://www.ptsnctb.com/

RobM
01-20-2006, 07:34 PM
just for eductional purposes... are there any upsides to the 700r4?

68ls1wannabe
02-08-2006, 09:28 AM
The best one that I've seen is the Stage 3 from Bow tie overdrives. It costs about $1300 but they've got it rated at 450+ hp. If I can't find a better deal then thats the one for me. One other question. On ls1tech.com the guys are putting 3200 to 4000 rpm stalls in their 4th gen camaro's with 4l60e trans and pulling some 1.4 to 1.7 60 ft times and running them as daily drivers. I know these are lockup converters and the 200r4 is supposedly the same. Can I put a 3500 lockup converter in my 68 camaro and still daily drive it and get decent mileage? Also who makes a good one. It'll be going behind a 383 sb.

rocketrod
02-08-2006, 10:52 AM
The best one that I've seen is the Stage 3 from Bow tie overdrives. It costs about $1300 but they've got it rated at 450+ hp. If I can't find a better deal then thats the one for me. One other question. On ls1tech.com the guys are putting 3200 to 4000 rpm stalls in their 4th gen camaro's with 4l60e trans and pulling some 1.4 to 1.7 60 ft times and running them as daily drivers. I know these are lockup converters and the 200r4 is supposedly the same. Can I put a 3500 lockup converter in my 68 camaro and still daily drive it and get decent mileage? Also who makes a good one. It'll be going behind a 383 sb.
I am having a 2004R built now. It will be using a CZ core, 86-87 Monte Carlo SS, alto red clutches, GN servo, deep pan, billet forward drum, etc. and will withstand low to mid 10 sec blasts in the 1/4 mile. PM me if you want more details.

StRacerDuke
02-14-2006, 09:17 PM
Let me stress the importance of correct CV cable adjusting! I burned up a fresh 700-R4 on a 64 chevelle that I use to own. It's a major PITA! You have to run a special bracket on a Holley carb if you want to set it right. The swing on the carb is the wrong radius for the CV pull. There is a special little bracket that ajust's the ratio. Make sure you get it ajusted correctly too, and not just by feel.

The beyond 3/4 throttle in 3rd gear wasn't that big of an issue because I rarely above 130. With my gear ratio I was passing the traps in the 1/4 in 3rd at 6,600 (on spray).

Hope this helps.

GetMore
02-18-2006, 02:18 PM
The 700-R4 has a greater spread between first, second, and third gears. You will have more pickup off the line with one. It also has a greater spread between first and overdrive. If you have a wide powerband and want power and economy you might be better off using the 700-R4.

Running a high-stall converter is going to hurt mileage when the clutch is unlocked. On the highway a 1200 stall is the same as a 5000 stall if the torque converter clutch is locked.
One of the things that allows a high stall to have good drivability is a higher STR (stall/torque ratio). This number coorelates to the torque multiplication of the converter. Mind you, as the converter slippage reduces so does the multiplication, and higher STRs usually have reduced efficiency, so just like choosing a cam, the bigger number is not always the best.

Steelrat
03-23-2009, 09:53 AM
Here is another article to fuel the debate. Illustrating the 700 being built stronger. I recognize this is comparison of stock units.
http://www.webrodder.com/article.php?AID=426&SID=6 (http://www.webrodder.com/article.php?AID=426&SID=6)

Also, from what I have read if you are running a lower HP/TQ motor the 200 may be have more suitable gearing with the 1 -2 shift. With 450 and up HP/TQ there should not be any issues of "falling down" from 1st - 2nd

Transmission Ratios
200-R4 1st - 2.74 2nd - 1.57 3rd - 1.00 4th- 0.67
700-R4 1st - 3.06 2nd -1.62 3rd- 1.00 4th - 0.70

In the end I think it comes down to the build/parts and builder.

Roadrage David
04-09-2009, 05:59 AM
Bowtie overdrives Level III tr2004r 170mph drive bij http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Dp0PngisVI

Steve Chryssos
04-09-2009, 06:25 AM
Now that's the right way to prove a point! :twothumbs :headbang:

Roadrage David
04-10-2009, 01:43 AM
Steve thats what i tought. we have that video clip on our website Stating ""We test the crap out of the parts we sell"".

Steve Chryssos
04-10-2009, 04:14 AM
Cool. I didn't know you were in business. I'd like to set you up as a dealer. Send me a PM or email if you are interested.

Roadrage David
04-10-2009, 09:11 AM
here is the ground level drive bij http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn3K6d_e7bw


Steve always intrested il send you a PM

megaladon6
04-11-2009, 04:19 PM
i vote for the 200-4r. but if you do go with a stock 700, buy the latest model one you can get. GM fixed most of the problems with them as years went on. or if you go to a 4l60e, it's basically a 700 with computer control. plus, you can get the shifter paddles on the steering wheel and better control with software upgrades.

Roadrage David
04-13-2009, 10:54 AM
Cool. I didn't know you were in business. I'd like to set you up as a dealer. Send me a PM or email if you are interested.
You have mail:machine: