The Stig
03-19-2019, 10:15 AM
A little history into my theory and how it came to be. Skip to the end paragraph for the actual question(s).
My buddy and I were looking at cars for the LeMons race (take a car under $1,000, add a rollcage and go racing) and we found an already caged Volvo V70R for sale for a very reasonable price... without the engine.
So naturally we started talking about engine swapping everything from the stock 5-cylinder? to a turbo Ecotech and of course a 5.0/350/big-block and how we'd lose the AWD but gain awesomeness and cool points at a race that doesn't really matter much. Then I started talking about a Pontiac 400 I have at home just sitting around attached to a TH400. Of course the first problem is, where do you mount a large engine and tranny NOT meant to go into a car like the Volvo. So we started talking about trans-mounting for a rear mounted, RWD car and how fun it would be.
Then I talked about mounting the tranny straight to the rear axle and bypassing the driveshaft for a true mid-engine, RWD station wagon. Bypassing the driveshaft has to be more responsive and less loss of power right?. On top of that, the heaviest part of the car is in basically the exact middle of the car and would have to be mounted to allow the tranny to be parallel with the rear axle input so the COG would be very low (lower than the stock mounted engine I would assume) so you have better weight distribution as well. The engine we were talking about is carbureted so you could attach a "snorkel" and cut out a hole in the roof and have a big ram air intake where the faster you drive, the more air would be "forced" in. Sure there are linkage problems, and the radiator and such would have to stay in the grill, but why not? Why are there no cars built like this? Would it be beneficial if we were to build such a contraption? Yes, money is always a large factor, but I can't find many cons in a setup like this aside from "it's just not done".
My buddy and I were looking at cars for the LeMons race (take a car under $1,000, add a rollcage and go racing) and we found an already caged Volvo V70R for sale for a very reasonable price... without the engine.
So naturally we started talking about engine swapping everything from the stock 5-cylinder? to a turbo Ecotech and of course a 5.0/350/big-block and how we'd lose the AWD but gain awesomeness and cool points at a race that doesn't really matter much. Then I started talking about a Pontiac 400 I have at home just sitting around attached to a TH400. Of course the first problem is, where do you mount a large engine and tranny NOT meant to go into a car like the Volvo. So we started talking about trans-mounting for a rear mounted, RWD car and how fun it would be.
Then I talked about mounting the tranny straight to the rear axle and bypassing the driveshaft for a true mid-engine, RWD station wagon. Bypassing the driveshaft has to be more responsive and less loss of power right?. On top of that, the heaviest part of the car is in basically the exact middle of the car and would have to be mounted to allow the tranny to be parallel with the rear axle input so the COG would be very low (lower than the stock mounted engine I would assume) so you have better weight distribution as well. The engine we were talking about is carbureted so you could attach a "snorkel" and cut out a hole in the roof and have a big ram air intake where the faster you drive, the more air would be "forced" in. Sure there are linkage problems, and the radiator and such would have to stay in the grill, but why not? Why are there no cars built like this? Would it be beneficial if we were to build such a contraption? Yes, money is always a large factor, but I can't find many cons in a setup like this aside from "it's just not done".