Turbo67camaro
03-29-2014, 08:20 PM
I have a 3 Powercell ISIS Power system. One in the trunk, one in the cabin, one in the engine compartment. The battery is in the trunk. I'm planning on a 3 wire, remote voltage sensing alternator system, which will likely be a 140amp via the Vintage Air Frontrunner system.
I'm thinking there may some benefit to applying some of the Madelectrical.com wiring tips to my ISIS install. In particular, using the alternator output to power the engine compartment Powercell with the benefit being less total voltage loss across the entire system, by shortening the distance that some of the amps flow. In a standard ISIS install, with a trunk mounted battery and a front engine, the full power output from the alternator would travel all the way back to the trunk incurring significant voltage loss, and then amps to power the front Powercell would have to flow from the trunk to the engine compartment, again incurring significant voltage loss. I'm thinking the below may be more efficient. If anyone has any good or bad comments on what I'm thinking I'd love to hear them, since I'm no wiring expert by any means. I think there could be some risk in doing this in that the front Powercell may be supplied with voltage closer to 14 instead of 12, and I don't know if the Powercell can handle the extra voltage. I think my routing of the remote voltage sensing wire all the way back to the trunk may be overkill as well, and perhaps routing it only to the engine compartment junction block would be more reasonable. Use of a 1 ga alternator to battery charge wire may be warranted in this case as well since ISIS recommends a charge wire that can handle the full alternator output (140 amps in my case) in a 3 wire alternator scenario.
92820
I'm thinking there may some benefit to applying some of the Madelectrical.com wiring tips to my ISIS install. In particular, using the alternator output to power the engine compartment Powercell with the benefit being less total voltage loss across the entire system, by shortening the distance that some of the amps flow. In a standard ISIS install, with a trunk mounted battery and a front engine, the full power output from the alternator would travel all the way back to the trunk incurring significant voltage loss, and then amps to power the front Powercell would have to flow from the trunk to the engine compartment, again incurring significant voltage loss. I'm thinking the below may be more efficient. If anyone has any good or bad comments on what I'm thinking I'd love to hear them, since I'm no wiring expert by any means. I think there could be some risk in doing this in that the front Powercell may be supplied with voltage closer to 14 instead of 12, and I don't know if the Powercell can handle the extra voltage. I think my routing of the remote voltage sensing wire all the way back to the trunk may be overkill as well, and perhaps routing it only to the engine compartment junction block would be more reasonable. Use of a 1 ga alternator to battery charge wire may be warranted in this case as well since ISIS recommends a charge wire that can handle the full alternator output (140 amps in my case) in a 3 wire alternator scenario.
92820