Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register



    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 27
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jul 2010
      Posts
      25

      Big block ,Small block

      This question has been asked before Im sure but just what is the difference between a big block and a small block?

      From any manufacturer



    2. #2
      Join Date
      May 2008
      Location
      SoCaL-Pico Rivera
      Posts
      1,138
      Country Flag: United States
      cubic inches! what is it that you are asking or want to know, be bit more specific. search button seems to answer a lot of questions as well.
      ---------Fabian Sanchez-----------
      71 velle Project Syckness ATS,Rushforth wheels,PRRC, Autometer,UMI, Hotchkis,QA1,hood-latches.com, comp cams,


      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=43881

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      Colorado
      Posts
      1,260
      Country Flag: United States
      Typically what differentiates the two is the bore center of the blocks.

      Its not really cubic inches as there was a 400" SBC and a 400" BBC

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      AZ
      Posts
      801
      Country Flag: United States
      I think he meant cubic inch potential, there are no 638ci SBCs. Though with new hemi's and LS engines able to reach the 420's and 450s respectively, the difference is dwindling.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Central FL
      Posts
      1,231
      Size of the actual block.
      Dan
      1968 Camaro v2
      LS6 :: Viper T56 :: C5 Brakes :: Hotchkis Suspension


    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Henderson,NV
      Posts
      2,870
      Country Flag: United States
      One has a SMALL block, and the other has a BIG block. haha Sorry..
      Todd

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Colorado
      Posts
      256
      Drew,
      I know you are a Mopar guy too so I understand the question. Mopar has an aftermarket 440 cube "small block" so it this truly a small block or big block......hmmm....possibly old school terms or maybe the bore is more of a question being a stock 440 big block has a larger bore than a small block. You can also stroke a 6.1 Hemi all the way to 440 cubes also. Again hmmm......

      At first I thought, what kind of question is this, but then I'm thinking this is a great question for no more reason than to ponder. One thing is that normally a stroker small block large cube will always be lighter than a big block so maybe that's better?
      Wes

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Santa Clarita Cal,
      Posts
      804
      Country Flag: United States
      Ones heavy, the other is light, I couldnt help myself either!
      RSK68
      Rick Klein

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jul 2010
      Posts
      25
      Ok i have heard this that GM did a small block and a big block,but as to what that really means is the block is bigger in dimensions than a smaller cubed engine,and a different casting with more weight of course ,so i guess the question is who coined the term "big block ,small block"?

      ,mopar did a 318 poly motor it was considered a big block compared to other engines, so i dont think chrysler used the term big block or small, i might be wrong, its just a question to ponder ,like what is a "muscle car"?,i just put it out there for discussion ,and jokes too!

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jul 2010
      Posts
      25
      Quote Originally Posted by MoparCar View Post
      Drew,
      I know you are a Mopar guy too so I understand the question. Mopar has an aftermarket 440 cube "small block" so it this truly a small block or big block......hmmm....possibly old school terms or maybe the bore is more of a question being a stock 440 big block has a larger bore than a small block. You can also stroke a 6.1 Hemi all the way to 440 cubes also. Again hmmm......

      At first I thought, what kind of question is this, but then I'm thinking this is a great question for no more reason than to ponder. One thing is that normally a stroker small block large cube will always be lighter than a big block so maybe that's better?
      Wes
      but in theory the more reciprocating mass will result in more torgue/hp right? with a true 440,block, crank,rods,pistons etc?

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Woodbury, MN
      Posts
      53
      Question has been answered.

      However, small blocks are better. Having a nice 427 LSX under the hood makes me wet.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Henderson,NV
      Posts
      2,870
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by rsk68 View Post
      Ones heavy, the other is light, I couldnt help myself either!
      That ain't always true.
      Todd

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      AZ
      Posts
      801
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
      That ain't always true.
      Assuming the same materials are used for both it is. Otherwise it's apples to papayas.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      AZ
      Posts
      801
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Drewcrane View Post
      but in theory the more reciprocating mass will result in more torgue/hp right? with a true 440,block, crank,rods,pistons etc?
      More torque yes, more horsepower no.

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Posts
      424
      I think what the poster really needs is a broader answer to this question.

      -------------------------------


      In the 1960s the Detroit brands all phased out their 1950s engines and introduced new engine families. (engine family = engines based off the same external cast-iron design. Most major bolt holes in the same places, the same accessories & transmissions & fluid pans fit, etc.) It's like an engine "platform", the factories had smaller & larger V8 platforms.



      When they were originally built in the 1960s, a smallblock V8 generally ranged from 280ci up to around 350ci (at least from the factory in the earlier years). The big-blocks usually ranged from around 370s up to the 450s.



      The factories kept using variations of the 1960s engine families for decades afterwards. Most of the V8s on the Detriot market were based off the 1960s stuff until the 1990s. Over time they usually tried to push them larger & larger displacements, particularly the smallblock stuff. So when you include all possible variations out there from both the factories and the aftermarket, there is now a fair amount of displacement overlap between the SBs and BBs. Lots of smallblocks that are 400+ cubic inches.

      But the engine family is still more important for parts interchange reasons than the size. A 400ci smallblock usually still shares most external dimensions & parts with a 280ci version from the 1960s, and shares virtually no parts with a 400ci big-block from the same brand.

      Sort of like having a laptop computer that's just as powerful as your desktop model. Your high-powered laptop is still gonna share more parts with a weaker version of that laptop than your equally-powered desktop model.


      ---------------------------------------


      So, what's the point of trying to make a smallblock so big when you can just use a big-block?

      Well, it's weight and physical packaging. A 400ci smallblock engine is still going to have a weight & size just about like a 280ci version. The same 400 cubic inches is gonna be a lot heavier and bigger to package inside the car when it's in a big-block engine design.

      But when you can make a smallblock much larger than the factory originally designed it, then imagine what you can do with a big-block . . . the aftermarket has pushed the 1960s big-block designs up to 500-600 inches these days.


      ---

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Houston, Tx
      Posts
      1,004
      Country Flag: United States

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Southern Indiana
      Posts
      4,699
      Country Flag: United States
      In general terms what most companies classify as a "big block" was the truck engines, which eventually got "borrowed" and built. Performance parts developed and since it would bolt to most readily available transmissions from most makers. So we get "big block" cars with truck engines and lots of torque.
      Small blocks are generally "car" engines, and remember back in the day before ohv engines you had 4cyl,6cyl and flat head, and pretty much 300ci was limit and if you made 300 hp it was some exotic piece, rare exceptions did come by.
      Beginning ohv passenger cars had hp potential, cars were getting heavier with lots of add ons and and such so guys started mounting modded truck engines in cars to take advantage of large engine design torque production as torque is king.
      and remember in the beginning days, engine compartments were cavernous so transplant is normal.
      Well sine the beginning day torque is still king, horse power is a number developed AFTER you get the torque curve numbers that are then put into an equation to derive the hp numbers.
      Now that we have found that we can get flow numbers into a small blocks similar to make power numbers similar to or better than big blocks without the weight restriction.
      Take a look at the LSx line, the engine was co developed with input form Jim Yates, NASCAR/NHRA engine builder and based its design around stiffness, air flow and reliability.
      Now for a push rod engine with one thought in mind, of power production its pretty close to near perfect.
      Ford now has the Mod motor, which in design respects was developed with the ability to make 2cyl(yes), 4 cyl, 6cyl(see 2011 Mustang), 8cyl, 10cyl and 12 cyl (when Ford still had a bigger stake in Rolls Royce and Jaguar)Now they also were thinking of 2, 3, 4, and even 5 and 6 valve configurations with single and double over head cam configuration.
      Fords ohc idea was/is an offshoot of SVT,SHO(yes they had a section with that title before SVT, Ford Motorsport, and Ford of Europe involvement with Cosworth)designs to get push rods out of the way of ports.
      Now take both LSX and Mod, both built around air flow/quality both can be made to produce large power numbers in small packages.
      Now still you drive up in a 70 Chevelle with a 3 deuce or 2x4bbl 427 Corvette engine or 8 stack injection intake or some other setup and say maybe a prot NOS kit, more guys are going to ooh and ahhhh rather than if you show up with a LSx.
      The guys who know that both can run with each other if built right are swayed by both, high tech guys will lean next to the LSx, old school guys will lean towards a big block.
      for the record the GM iterations small block is 1in shorter, 1in narrower and 1in in length less than a GM big block. Weight considerations are a big block with aluminum heads/intake weighs the same as small block, yet both can be had in all aluminum, yet LSx can also be had in aluminum.
      Now to put another thing out there the Ford Mod motor is TINY EXCEPT for the top end making packaging hard.
      This is one reason why the LSx is ohv. Now add in it can have variable cam timing, be nearly 500 cubes and make big power.
      But you have to think the SBC lasted nearly 50 years before a new engine design was needed.
      Pretty cool, just wonder how long the LSx will live?
      Lee Abel
      AFTERMARKET PERFORMANCE

      1977 Chevy Monza 2+2:Project "Cheap Trick"
      1978 C10 Long bed , On air and trailer puller
      2006 Buell Blast ,Just a bike to ride and for mileage
      1966 Caprice 4dr Sports Roof fact.327/now 350/SOON 454???? Project "II Old,,,ZERO BUDGET OR LESS CAPRICE!"

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jul 2010
      Posts
      25
      So really the term big block , small block was coined by GM years ago,

      i really havent seen it used in any mopars books that i know of,the mopar engines ,small block was an LA engine 318,340,360

      ,383,is an R block,and 440 is a RB block,the difference from these two is the 440 has a higher deck height, bottom casting is the same , except for the internals,

      it seems people have just used the name for description,kinda like "posi traction" on a mopar its "sure grip", people just use the name for ease of describing the engines,thanks for all the input here it will solve alot of arguments on this subject i hope

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Posts
      424
      No, it's really not a GM-centric designation. Ford and Mopar both have clearly understood "small block" and "big block" motors.


      --------------------------------


      When we describe all this stuff in text, the different engine details might kinda jumble up and run together in the reader's mind. But if you actually had all these motors in front of you, the SB and BB differences would be very clear.


      For example, the Mopars - yes, there were multiple deck heights on the "big block" shape. The B and the RB blocks.

      But if you had half a dozen different 1960s Mopar engines all sitting in front of you, there is absolutely no question of what is related to what. The B and RB blocks are both rooted in the same design. Even with different deck heights, they are so similar they can barely even be told apart just by sight. Almost everything (including the actual cylinder heads) is still interchangeable between them.

      Whereas you can pick out a B/RB block from any LA (small block) from across the room.

      ---------------------------------


      Let me put it this way - I could rattle off a ton of differences between the Camaro and Firebird. When it's printed in text and you don't have any visuals to work with, the descriptions could easily start to make the these two cars sound like very different animals from each other. Same with the differences between a Chevelle and a Pontiac GTO.

      But they're not. Park a 1969 Camaro, a '69 Firebird, 69 Chevelle, and a 69 GTO all together . . . there's absolutely no question which two are related to which other two. You can clearly see it from across the parking lot, no matter how many differences can be documented on paper.


      -

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jul 2010
      Posts
      25
      Quote Originally Posted by mikedc View Post
      No, it's really not a GM-centric designation. Ford and Mopar both have clearly understood "small block" and "big block" motors.


      --------------------------------


      When we describe all this stuff in text, the different engine details might kinda jumble up and run together in the reader's mind. But if you actually had all these motors in front of you, the SB and BB differences would be very clear.


      For example, the Mopars - yes, there were multiple deck heights on the "big block" shape. The B and the RB blocks.

      But if you had half a dozen different 1960s Mopar engines all sitting in front of you, there is absolutely no question of what is related to what. The B and RB blocks are both rooted in the same design. Even with different deck heights, they are so similar they can barely even be told apart just by sight. Almost everything (including the actual cylinder heads) is still interchangeable between them.

      Whereas you can pick out a B/RB block from any LA (small block) from across the room.

      ---------------------------------


      Let me put it this way - I could rattle off a ton of differences between the Camaro and Firebird. When it's printed in text and you don't have any visuals to work with, the descriptions could easily start to make the these two cars sound like very different animals from each other. Same with the differences between a Chevelle and a Pontiac GTO.

      But they're not. Park a 1969 Camaro, a '69 Firebird, 69 Chevelle, and a 69 GTO all together . . . there's absolutely no question which two are related to which other two. You can clearly see it from across the parking lot, no matter how many differences can be documented on paper.


      -
      yea that makes sense too! i can spot an R engine over an RB engine block there are some tell tale things , but you are right a small block is a different looking block,not just the size and weight, distributor location,water pump etc., 383 ,440 there about the same except like i said with different internals, and the 440 has a flat boss on the front of the block under the intake,as well as the higher deck,


      and as i posted before AMC used the same blocks,interesting comments here

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com