Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 47
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360

      BMW Wheel using 4.75" Bolt Pattern Hubs Discussion

      Guys,
      Lately I've been reading about some people using BMW wheels on their cars which have 4.75" BP hubs & axles. I understand BMW wheels are a cheap, durable alternative to aftermarket wheels and many styles look pretty good.



      I was bothered by the mentality that BMW's 4.72" BP was "good enough" for the 4.75" hub. The fact is we're talking about the 5 fasteners that attach wheels to the vehicle; we've seen these studs break from fatigue using wheels with the correct BP. Turns out, this "minor" difference in BP bends the stud at a 0.53 degree angle. Now we have a situation were the stud, designed ONLY to be in tension, is undergoing combined stress (tension and bending) during the assembly procedure. This is not good!

      So I did a little FEA simulation to see what kind of difference this is going to make. This analysis only shows what the stud is undergoing after the lug nut is torqued. This does not show us:
      1. “Twisting” stress from torque applied to the stud;
      2. Stress from driving the vehicle;
      3. Fatigue over time.

      Please note these three situations will make the results worse. Here we go:


      Here is the stud using a 4.75" BP wheel. Note the stress concentrations at the chamfer resulting from 10,000+lbs of tension. These results are typical.



      Here is the same stud using a BMW wheel. Note the larger stress concentrations resulting from bending stress, and the stress continues all the way up the shank. This photo shows the stud being bent away from us; the other side is in compression and results in a stress concentration higher up the press-in shank (about where the threads start). Stress has increased by a little over 20%. That's a significant increase. Again, accounting for fatigue and torque-related stress will further reduce the stud's service life.

      I'm not trying to rain on anybody's parade about using BMW wheels, but I feel this is something people should know when making a decision on which wheel to use.
      Last edited by silver69camaro; 06-09-2011 at 01:16 PM.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Atlanta GA
      Posts
      7,477
      Thats greeeaat... thats just fuc kin great, MAN..

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Oregon
      Posts
      1,773
      Country Flag: United States
      Nice comparison Matt. It's remarkable what .012" absolute position difference can do.

      On the same subject, we've been asked if upgrading to a larger stud would offset any of the increased stress due to the combined loading scenario created by the wheel pattern mismatch, and the short answer is no, it doesn't. A larger diameter stud is typically torqued to a proportionally higher value than a smaller stud, so the internal stresses should show similar trending regardless of stud diameter.

      Tobin
      KORE3
      It's what I does.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Location
      Everett, WA
      Posts
      501
      Alright, I'll bite. I'm an engineer... I've done plenty of FEA... 20% stress increase on a stud that has a huge safety factor to begin with isn't that bad. 190,000 PSI tensile strength on standard press-in studs to begin with...

      Yeah yeah, tension vs tension and shear loading. I don't think it makes a BFD when the studs are overbuilt to begin with. Fun analysis, and good for people to know, but I wouldn't hesitate to put BMW wheels on a street driven car.
      The few, the proud, the crazy... the LT1 owners.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      Midwest
      Posts
      2,261
      Country Flag: United States
      Yeah, but under an autocross situation with a 4000 lb car?
      Kevin Oeste
      V8 Speed and Resto Shop
      V8TV
      Muscle Car Of The Week
      V8 Radio Podcast

      All about us:
      https://www.v8speedshop.com


    6. #6
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Location
      Everett, WA
      Posts
      501
      Quote Originally Posted by oestek View Post
      Yeah, but under an autocross situation with a 4000 lb car?
      Every application is different. I said street driven car, not autocross. Like the original post stated, good for people to know, and make their own informed decision.

      I stand by what I posted.
      The few, the proud, the crazy... the LT1 owners.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,516
      Country Flag: United States
      Is there some kind of scale to accompany the colors on those analyses?

      How far from the rated capability of the stud is this?

      Sort of hard for me to put this into perspective without some kind of absolute numbers to go with it.


      Thanks,
      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      NW burbs IL
      Posts
      1,732
      Damn there goes using my GTO space saver spare to finish a race.
      Matt


      Current project: " Chain Reaction "

      A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.

      1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.

      Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Quote Originally Posted by 69LT1Nova View Post
      Alright, I'll bite. I'm an engineer... I've done plenty of FEA... 20% stress increase on a stud that has a huge safety factor to begin with isn't that bad. 190,000 PSI tensile strength on standard press-in studs to begin with...
      I agree the SF on wheel studs is way high for obvious reasons. But, like I said before, we've all seen studs break before. Granted I've never seen a brand new stud fail, but as you should know fatigue will wear the stud.

      New stock-style studs aren't even legal in some classes, which raises some eyebrows about their ability in the first place.

      Again, 20% is the minimum increase. Fatigue, corrosion, etc. will increase that.

      Notice I did not say that people shouldn't run BMW wheels. Its up to the individual. I'm not saying it would fail, and I'm not saying it wont. It's all about education.
      Last edited by silver69camaro; 12-19-2008 at 09:52 AM. Reason: Clarification
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Posts
      328
      I was just curious under what conditions you have seen the studs break with these wheels?

      I was searching and also read a post by someone who had their spacers break, but his was the only one I saw.
      Used to be known as Jsapata

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Quote Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
      Is there some kind of scale to accompany the colors on those analyses?

      How far from the rated capability of the bolt is this?

      Sort of hard for me to put this into perspective without some kind of absolute numbers to go with it.

      I have a feeling this might become a lively thread. Good. Things have been a little quiet here lately.

      Thanks,
      Don
      Don, I chose to leave out the scale on purpose. First, it was somewhat difficult to read. Second, the number isn't really imporant (to a degree) because it's the difference that I was interested in.

      Rated capability of the bolt is somewhat difficult to definitively say. There are several methods to determine what a wheel stud load capacity is, and the use of the car will have a great effect. Say, a stud for a track car will have a lower rating than the same stud on a street car...it increases the safety factor.

      Yes, the safety factor is high to begin with...but these SFs are based on stock vehicles driving on the road. Many of us no longer fit that profile.

      Again, I'm not saying the stud will break for sure. It may never happen. But if you have wide tires that will see high corner loads, the risk is there. And if one stud breaks, there is an increased chance the others will follow soon.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Location
      Everett, WA
      Posts
      501
      Quote Originally Posted by silver69camaro View Post
      Notice I did not say that people shouldn't run BMW wheels. Its up to the individual. I'm not saying it would fail, and I'm not saying it wont. It's all about education.
      Agreed! Good for people to know this info, especially if they push their cars hard on the track - such as autocrossing or going for max G's on a skidpad.
      The few, the proud, the crazy... the LT1 owners.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Quote Originally Posted by Jsapata View Post
      I was just curious under what conditions you have seen the studs break with these wheels?
      I've seen studs break just about everywhere and usually the reason is unknown. Many situations could cause it (over torqueing, fatigued, over stressed, etc) and all this situations could apply to us as well. I don't know anybody who runs BMW wheels, if that's what you're referring to.

      Here's a guy at CC.com that had an issue with his former Autocross car:
      http://www.corner-carvers.com/forums...ht=broken+stud

      A simple search on Yahoo:
      http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=bro...p=mss&ei=UTF-8

      Yahoo Images:
      http://images.search.yahoo.com/searc...b&fr=yfp-t-501
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Feb 2007
      Location
      USA, TN
      Posts
      850
      I'll be the first to admit that there is an extra load because the .5 degree flex, But I'd argue that the lug is actually flexing that much. At minimum, you are torquing down a grade 8 fastener with a hardened steal lug into a conical seat cast aluminum wheel. I would think the wheel would take up at least half the flex. I'd be currious to see what the load difference is at a .25 degree flex.

      I'm also curious as to the manufacturing tolerance of most Chinese wheels that people are using today. I may get at least as good of fit with a set of quality BMW wheels

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,552
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm not sure I would say the importance is higher on a track vehicle. A track vehicle will be pushed to the limits putting higher stress loadings, but tracks tend to have smooth surfaces. Streets have potholes, railroad crossings, and speed bumps to deal with, which will impart impact loads in addition to dynamic loads. More than 20% is enough to make me consider it not worth the risk.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      San Diego, CA
      Posts
      599
      I do understand that this is only stress from torquing the nuts, but I would beg to differ that stress level does make a difference. What are your stress levels like compared to the yield stress? That's the critical factor. I can design parts all day long that increase stress by 12% and there's no concern that they are going to break. Percentage is all relative the how big of numbers you're working with.

      Let's use some round numbers to illustrate my point. If your yield stress is 100ksi and you have 1ksi of stress in your part, then a 12% increase is very negligible and not something to be concerned about. On the other hand, if you have 90ksi of stress in your part, then 12% increase would definitely be of interest and would probably be the straw that broke the camel's back.

      Dustin

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Posts
      111
      my small brain would like to ask what I thought was an obvious question. Why can't someone just machine a set of offset conical bushings? Would the bushing be too thin and rendered basically useless?

      i'm not an engineer just a dumb finance guy

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Sesser, Il
      Posts
      490
      I'm wondering how many OEM wheel manufacturers hold their tolerances to .03" anyway. I know not many of us are running OEM wheels but there are a LOT of cars on the roads that are. I agree we do put more stress on our cars but...

      If you measured enough wheels, I wouldn't be surprised that you'd find some wheels with a 4.70" to 4.80" tolerances.

      Just tossing out some idle thinking...
      Doug Gulley

      66 C10 383, AFR 190, Accel SuperRam, Hyd Roller 230*/236* 280XFI, aftermarket T56, *under construction*

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,552
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 86Cutlass383SR View Post
      I'm wondering how many OEM wheel manufacturers hold their tolerances to .03" anyway. I know not many of us are running OEM wheels but there are a LOT of cars on the roads that are. I agree we do put more stress on our cars but...

      If you measured enough wheels, I wouldn't be surprised that you'd find some wheels with a 4.70" to 4.80" tolerances.

      Just tossing out some idle thinking...
      Yes, but if you want to talk tolerances they would apply to both bolt circle-based wheels, so you've added a nominal shift to the basic dimension. Which in some cases they could overlap, but in others, they could be quite a bit more off.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Feb 2007
      Location
      USA, TN
      Posts
      850
      I would think most factory wheels are withing .01 inch, certainly newer BMW wheels are. Its the Chinese wheels that make me wonder. All these TTIIs and other popular American named Chinese wheels are probably hit and miss with .05 tolerances.

      Again the .03 difference is spread across the pattern, so no one lug is more than .015 off.

    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com